Work Around: Stop the page loading before it ends itself. You can keep Adblock and write a message. (This message was written with Adblock blocking Gamespot).
nomailx's forum posts
Stopped reading after "Accessibility: LoL".
What Accessibility? you have to pay for heroes, and only like 5% are available at start.
Game looks terrible. 10 years ago maybe, but now, LoL belongs in a garbage can.
Anyone who doesn't agree with this is retarded.
Naaah, played the game with a gamepad. It's the game itself that worths nothing.If you use a Ps3 or 360 controller this game essentially becomes the console version with new additional content that is extremely fun to play.
I think it is deserving of a 9/10 easily. Most of the user ratings are low due to the poor porting that was done, and complete inability to play the game with mouse and keyboard.
94thmp
Ok guys, I am sure you are all familiar with the Gamespot spoilercast, and maybe you also enjoy hearing the different point of view of different reviewers.
I agree with the Gamespot review of Diablo 3, but i think that while the review is fair and relevant for casual players, most hardcore players may have been disapointed.
Maybe a spoilercast about the huge contreversy of the all time best seller game would bring a closure to every players.
Therefore, I am officialy starting this petition to bring Diablo 3 to the attention of the Spoilercast team.
signed
nomailx
buy? yeah sure.
Simple: Take the action combat system of KoA, put it in skyrim. And that's it.
BTW that Severance: Blade of Darkness game did look really interesting.brucecambell
It's a really old game, with old graphics, but if you want a true combat experience, playing the knight is mostly immersive. Blade of Darkness strongest feature is clearly not it's plot or it's rpg experience. It sucks at both. But if you want combat, it's the game to play. for more than 10 years, I still didn't find a similarly combat immersive game. The fights, contact reactions are so good, that you don't even care about the plot. I stronly suggest you to download and try it.
There are many improvements to the Elder Scroll's typical combat formula that can be improved without changing the perspective. They can make each hit feel more satisfying instead of it feeling like you're cutting air, for example. They can also make enemies more aware and focused on you instead of running around like morons. They could allow you to block and stab at the same time, etc.
Saying "it's as good as it's going to get" isn't the best attitude because there already are first person games with much, much better combat than the Elder Scrolls. Condemned comes to mind. Although not in a fantasy RPG setting, each confrontation was tense and the melee mechanics worked well. Although a better example would probably beDark Messiah of Might and Magic. It was a flawed game, sure, but the combat was great. If they implemented something like that in an ES game, it would be awesome.IndianaPwns39
That's exactly what I am talking about. I really like the idea of an immersive world making players eager to explore. Great RPG elements, Interesting stories. It's deceiving to see that a great game like this in which a lot of work has been invested, has such crappy and illogical combat features. I would have accepted a 10 time smaller map, for 2 time better combats.
That's why i use a bow. Nothing wrong with the combat there.
But you aren't going to have Batman levels of awesome combat from a game which mainly utilises the first person view.
Ilovegames1992
lol, there you go.
Log in to comment