@ahmetxca: I feel completely the opposite to this. I've found this season so far the most watchable out of all of them, considering "not much" has happened.
However I do sense that some things like you have just mentioned are simply down to the show coming to an end and instead of dragging things out like they have done before, they are aligning everything up as quick as realistically they can without it being too rushed so they can give good air time to the main battles and endings coming up.
My personal issue with the show is that it became too much about the outer circle of Rick. He is by far the strongest character and in the earlier seasons it felt like we were experiencing this zombie shitstorm with him. Now he is almost barely in it and we are stuck with these incredibly forced and for the most part awful side characters. Episode 6 "swear" was by far the worst episode I think that they could possibly ever do which totally sums up my point.
People are right, Zombies instead of being something they fear (which I guess being subjected to them for so long you'd normalise a bit) but it just hasn't branched out to different areas. Neegan is very much "the final boss" and I can't really see how they can further the show after his demise.
Its a shame the show has become so hit and miss, because when its good its really good, but its become far more frustrating to watch and almost feels like its trying to cater for the "softer" audience.
Millions of people play BF4? I don't believe that for a second. Its a shame as the latest community maps are pretty awesome to be honest. While I missed BF3 those who I know who played BF3 say how that is the superior game.
I think its fair to say if people want the Battlefield experience they will probably have to wait until another developer comes out with a game that is similar as DICE just isn't in the position to be doing that anymore.
This all seems too little to late, if they release this its just going to be on the same broken platform the game is already on. In my experience the game is becoming less and less played with servers becoming increasingly more empty. Our "clan" has just dropped our own server because it was becoming almost impossible to fill and the game just seemed to suck so much :(. Real shame!
Have to say I was really happy to see Jeff on here and voicing his opinions. I think its those opinions though that seem to offend either some of the blind Nintendo fans or newer gamers who don't really know anything pre-last gen.
I think there is certainly a growing dislike towards the industry for bringing out the same stuff over and over and over and over again. Think about the comparison for getting a XboxOne over as PS4. Really the argument is right nowl; PS4 produces the same games but slightly better graphics. Which essentially means you are getting the same experience on both consoles. So there is no real diversity between the two.
People have suggested before that there would be another "gaming crash". I think what we are seeing is a gaming industry grinding to a halt. No games that have been announced so far that I can think of are "new" games. There is nothing that is like WOAH that has never been done before, or even very close to being near original. I mean even Star Citizen so far looks essientially like a star wars game I played back in 1996 or 1997. The whole "you black out from excessive g-force" was in flight simulator 98.
Hopefully VR can bring something new to the table and with UE4 being really relatively easy to produce stuff as well as Unity etc, hopefully something fresh will come along.
Seems questionable to why this wasn't released on the new consoles. Surely a install base of 5+ Million on each platform with limited games, more so with racing and this could have been a great seller.
Interesting that they gave it a 9 when the games is an inferior version to the Xbox one and PC version. I mean the does the graphical aspect including performance not matter enough to deduct a point? According to the score this game is just as good as the "better" version :P
Any reason why technical merits of a game are not covered in reviews anymore? I mean it doesn't have to be a graphics battering of a console but there is no mention of what platform looks best and performs best. That could be a real issue for some people where a game doesn't run at a some 60fps for example.
Graphics don't make a game but its how a game is displayed to the player. Not to throw accusations but perhaps there are external pressures to prevent such platforms of being exempt of being highlighted as the lesser platform for this game or others.
o0squishy0o's comments