there's a sold listing on Ebay for over $1,100 for a sealed Dreamcast. So list it for something around that price.
ogvampire's forum posts
"And Biden botched it plain and simple. That withdraw would have never happened like that under Trump they would have been horrified to pull that off under a republican."
right, cause we all know how great Trump is with plans. his only other plan was the Mexican wall. how did that end up? nothing even close to what he promised, and quite a few sections simply fell off due to high winds. great foresight by a stable genius. This was just a wall, not a complicated withdrawal in just a few months time.
"Trump is leagues ahead of him cognitively"
there are different degrees of senility. however, Trump is senile AND a traitor and convicted felon.
"The fact they went after him right when they knew he would be the republican candidate is evidence enough."
so you got no facts to back it up. that's what i thought. face it bro, you got nothing but BS. in regards to your remark, Trump claimed he would run again immediately after losing his re election. so that doesn't hold water either. time to go back to your Qanon forums and find another excuse.
"Lol no because unlike you i hate echo chambers."
and yet you spout nothing but BS Trump tik tok video nonsense and Fox News fact-free talking points. you haven't had an original remark yet.
"Even the experts at CNN has said they have nothing."
show me this instance. I bet you simply didn't comprehend what they were saying, which is obviously very common for you.
"Alan Dershowitz hates Trump and he is even saying it's bullshit."
you mean Fox News legal analyst Alan Dershowitz, who is a staunch defender of Trump and who wrote a book titled 'The Case Against Impeaching Trump'? you must live in bizarro world bro.
"The only thing embarrassing are you clowns acting like Biden is cognitively capable"
uh, quite a few folks are asking for Biden to step down. something that republicans won't do for a senile traitor and convicted felon. it's a legit cult.
@WitIsWisdom:
"we don't know all the details yet, but it sure is convenient that before they released the name they scrubbed the net clean of any traces of those affiliations minus of course showing he registered as a Republican in 21"
bro, you gotta somehow loosen that tinfoil hat of yours, it's on way too tight.
it's always straight to conspiracy with some people.
9/11 was an inside job, right?
Now do Covid lab leaks and the vaccine is safe & effective.
Or maybe try the Hunter Biden laptop is Russian disinformation.
Keep eating up what 3 letter agencies and the media tell you.
Covid vaccine is as safe as other vaccines. in that some people may react negatively, but 99.9% will be fine. that's how they work. Science... it's difficult, but you can learn it too! just gotta try
and the Covid lab leak theory is still a theory. the 'smoking gun' on this is a 'low confidence' report from the Department of Energy. But as i said, it wasn't proven. Scientists, from all over the world, still have not confirmed where it came from.
and let's not forget the dumbest possible conspiracy theory of all: the 2020 election was stolen. i still can't believe that there are idiots out there that believe it to be true.
"Was killing 13 soldiers and stealing billions of dollars in millitary equipment part of Trumps deal? Are you serious? If they attempted that under Trump we would have had a full blown war with them and he would have cancelled the withdraw."
Once again, the terms of the withdrawal were drawn up by Trump, and Biden followed those terms. The terms had a deadline of August of 2021. Biden became president a little over 6 months before that day. in other words, it had to be rushed because of that deadline. Trump could have picked a later deadline but didn't.
"He can't even form a logical sentence."
say you have never heard Trump speak at rallies without actually saying you never heard Trump speak at rallies. Trump talks nonsense and jumps from 1 topic to another in the same sentence. whatever you complain about Biden, Trump does more of.
"He is pathetic and you think it's a complete coincidence Russia invaded Ukraine and Palestine attacked Israel when Trump was out of office?"
one of the dumbest arguments imaginable. only a cult brain would make such a claim.
"I'm talking about the DA's who decided to prosecute the case. Merrick Garland and Alvin Brag have had a complete hate boner for Trump under Bidens orders."
show any evidence of this. go ahead. i'll wait.
"And Juan Merchan who donated to Bidens campaign was the judge in the hush money trial."
a jury found Trump guilty, not the Judge. He was also not handpicked by Biden. That's not how State matters work. There is nothing that Judge Merchan did during the trial that showed any bias, which is why his participation as a judge in the case was reviewed by a separate court and allowed to move forward.
"Every legal expert existence has said they don't have jack shit on him and will most likely get thrown out by the Supreme Court."
so you're saying that every single 'legal expert' that Fox News brought on said that you can lie on loan documents? funny since every other legal expert except those on Fox News or whatever source you get your 'news' (and i use that term VERY loosely) from said the opposite. you cannot lie on a loan document. this is easily provable and it showed. Trump was found guilty by a jury. end of discussion.
bro, stop with your nonsense. you're doing nothing but embarrassing yourself with obvious garbage.
Yes mate, trump is far more dangerous - you go that right cocko!
You say that as two wars kicked off that would have never happened under Trump.
Meanwhile Biden is going after free speech and political opponents.
"You say that as two wars kicked off that would have never happened under Trump."
with that same logic, we then can blame for Trump allowing Covid to happen under his watch. this is the type of logic and reasoning that you're using. it's utter nonsense.
"Meanwhile Biden is going after free speech and political opponents."
Trump threated the media multiple times as president. and Biden must be really conniving. he somehow forced his political opponents to break the law. haha! anyone that's for 'law and order' would want folks that break the law to be prosecuted. all this means is that you only believe in 'law and order' when it targets anyone other than a republican. you're part of the problem
Not even close to the same logic.
"Do you honestly think the Taliban would have handled our withdraw from Afghanistan the same way they did under Biden?"
Trump made an agreement with the Taliban for the withdrawal. Biden followed the terms of the withdrawal agreement. so you're saying that the Taliban was mad that Biden followed up on the terms and not Trump? are you serious?
Let's forget the fact that General Frank McKenzie, the head of Central Command, claimed that the troubles with the withdrawal were due to Trump's agreement with the Taliban:
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/9/30/us-generals-say-afghanistan-collapse-rooted-in-trump-taliban-deal
"Biden is a joke internationally, nobody fears repercussions from the US when you have someone that weak in office."
he's not weak. this is just another fact-free claim by republicans. if no foreign country would fear repercussions by the Biden admin, then China would have take Taiwan years ago. Further, saying that the Russians wouldn't have attacked because Trump seems powerful is a ridiculous statement. cult much?
"And it's not that Biden forced Trump to break the law it's that he had hand pointed prosecutors and judges to go after him right before an election."
so you're saying that Biden hand picked Judge Cannon, who was appointed by Trump, to go after Trump and also hand picked Jack Smith, the prosecutor? the case just got tossed because one of the issues is that the Judge claimed the prosecutor WASN'T appointed by the president. This, by the way, went against previous rulings.
As for the New York case, Biden also does NOT pick the prosecutors or Judges for State matters.
i'm seriously arguing with someone that forms their viewpoints on anything BUT facts.
@WitIsWisdom: "Either way the answers are there... we just don't have access to them, and they went to great lengths to ensure that before releasing a name. It's highly probable the people involved in this case already have all the answers they're looking for. The question is, why aren't they telling us?"
I would think they wouldn't just throw info out there without consideration for such a high profile act of terrorism. They are probably trying to be very careful due to the current political environment.
"I only want answers just like you or anyone else concerned. Regardless of affiliation or personal endeavor. Sure I lean right these days, but that doesn't mean I don't want the truth one way or the other."
I agree with you on that. nowadays, we want to know everything as soon as possible. but sometimes, the 'truth' may take some time
@WitIsWisdom: that's fine, but you're just some random dude who only has the internet as the source of your 'investigation'.
you're not an actual investigator if all you have is the internet. real investigators also talk to the family, friends, etc.
have you contacted the family and their friends? no? ok then.
EDIT: "Democrat, Republicas, or anything in-between isn't the real threat. The threat lies within whether or not this was a one off and he was working alone or if he was backed by others with a plan."
yes. which is what the FBI is working to find out. let's allow the professionals to do their work before jumping to conclusions.
@LJS9502_basic: Post some credible links then. I'm not saying you're wrong, I just want to see for myself.
I'm not making any rash conclusions, I'm just saying we don't know the whole story and it's clear they are trying to shape the narrative.
claiming that they're info is scrubbed online just because you couldn't find anything IS a rash conclusion. any respectable person would just wait for more info to come out from actual investigators. but something tells me that you wouldn't believe anything they say unless is aligns with your views. tsk tsk
@sargentd: "Stupid it ever went to court in the first place"
nah. 'stupid' would be purposely disregarding the main reason why Trump was indicted. the difference, as LJS9502_basic already stated, is that Trump refused to return the docs and obstructed the collection of said docs.
@kuu2: you think you're a serious person? hahah! good one
Log in to comment