The final solution will be pci-e SDDs. Those for PC are blazing fast! but $4000 for 256GB IIRC

So low settings aren't bugged anymore? I'm getting 15~60FPS at high shadow off bloom on 1680x1050, E4500, 2GB RAM, 8600M GT DDR2 475/1450/500, Vista64 And articrecon, the 7900GS is never gonna run DX10 lol.

@Roman? What are talking about? The 360 has an ATI card is based on the Radeon X1900 and the PS3's is a Geforce 7800GTX on steroids. Both of them are running on DirectX9 /OpenGL 2.0. The 360's has a unified shader achitecture that is common to DX10 but that's as far as it goes

I don't remember which one but I saw on another gaming reviewers website that when you change a certain video option in the PS3 options, it looks exactly the same as the 360 version btw

I love Vista. Never had any problems since Beta. XP does have high framerates, but pretty much unoticeable most of the time...

You just put 2 E4600 for $230

Gamespot, care to use today's CPUS (i.e, E6850 rather than the X6800) and widescreen resolutions?

AMD still has price/performance advantage so it's not that bad. But gamespot, why the E6700? Shouldn't you use the E6550 or E6750 by now?

You guys really should change your benchmark rigs. Start using CPUs like E6550 and E6750 and use the 1280x800, 1680x1050 and 1920x1200 resolutions!

DX10 is no sh!t. It adds more possibility for physics & allows real debris/clouds I'm still wondering why everyone still think it will boost image quality...