[QUOTE="Shadow-Eagle"]Serious Sam 1 & 2.smokeydabear076

Those games are great for co-op.. However i do recommend that you take breaks.. gets repetitive quickly...

[QUOTE="XaosII"]

I dont really see it all that difficult, especially for a game like Gears of War, to detect multiple USb controllers and use that as each player's input.

Or even better, do what Supreme Commander does that can detect multiple monitors, and each monitor can be a person playing (or split two per monitor so up to 4 players can play in two monitors in a much larger viewing regeion that can be done on a console).

bmaisey

Oh really? Youre a game programmer? If it were feasible, theyd probably do it. But its probably too difficult (see the long explanation post above) and it wouldnt be often used. 2x mouse/keyboard would be very hard, and would require lots of physical space, and how many people would have 2 pc controllers spare just for playing co-op games like this? Playing it via lan is fine, and preferable for most people.

Settlers 2 was split screen co-op :)

That was awhile ago... But a split screen fps on pc would be alittle more difficult.

borrowed it from a friend and beat the single player in a day :( really not worth the 50$ so i bought WiC insteadSOTE

Good choice :P

[QUOTE="onemic"][QUOTE="Deihmos"][QUOTE="onemic"][QUOTE="Deihmos"]

There is no Lan coop afaik and it's a good game. YourPC could do with 2GB of ram.

Deihmos

2gb of RAM for halo 2? That's ridiculous. It's either that the game was badly ported, or the game was badly ported. Take your pick.

2GB has been the best option for years even if you use XP.

Not for a game that is over three years old it shouldn't. My 1.25gb of RAM has been able to run all the latest games(Bioshock is the latest game I've bought so far) flawlessly.

I was able to play it on a laptop that has 1GB of ram and integrated goforce 6150. 2GB is just the the best option for gaming these days.

Agreed.