I go to my local game stores around town and talk to the guys I know well there, they give me straight answers and they know my likes as well so they can advise me if I'd enjoy it or not. But most of the time, I go with my gut feeling, and I'm usually right about how I'll score it once I play it.
counterstrike has so many cheaters that it can create an atmosphere of suspicion. ive been kicked from a server because there is ledge in assault thats just high enough to see a creeping opponent if youre on level ground and i made a pretty sweet shot on the top of his bobbing head. naturally, that comfirmed all their suspicions that the high mouse sensitivity i play with was really aimbots to aid my wallhacking. i dont know whether to blame the hackers that create the suspicion or the paranoid noobs that booted me.LoG-Sacrament
CS has always been the worst for cheaters and really all 10 of these things apply to this game a lot. Thankfully over the years, Valve's really been dedicated to get rid of blatant cheaters.
Then we at least agree on something. I understand where you're coming from on #5, after all it is simply a weapon within the confines of the game. My only issue with it is like I said the people who use that weapon only and nothing else. It's not impressive to master one weapon, it's impressive to master multiple weapons.
Then I'd like to see these people take these "smart tactics" onto a real battlefield and show me what'll really happen. I know it's a game and I know people will always search for an easier way to get ahead of people in the game. But I feel like games never reward people who literally try to play the game completely fair without using overpowered weapons and glitches. I wouldn't be making topics like this if I didn't feel frustrated after finishing a game of hockey where I lost 7-2 because my opponent decided to use a shot that works 100% of the time, a shot that HAS TO BE DONE A CERTAIN WAY or else it does not work. That is a glitch, an exploit in the game. If you think that it's an acceptable way to play the game, then that's fine, that's your opinion. But I feel that it's cheap and it ruins the game for people who are just trying to play it for the fun of playing it and because they love the game their playing. It's hard to have fun playing a game where the only way to beat someone is to use an exploit that really isn't proving that you're very skilled at the game.
Then your definition of fun is far different than mine, my friend. I'd would much rather win a game by playing a smart, strategic game that I could leave and say "Man, I really did everything right in this round." then play a game running around the map whipping grenades left and right, and spraying and praying. And at the end of the day, that's my opinion and you have yours. That's how it is.
Log in to comment