ramey70's forum posts
[QUOTE="xXHackettXx"]I have a HD-DVD player but it seems all the good movies are going to blueray. Casino Royle, Crank... Does anyone know which format 300 will be on? Just came to theaters but would be a blueray player just to see it in HD.-Sir-Poof-
Almost positive Blu-Ray.
The movie is made by Warner Bros. They support both HD-DVD and Bluray.I have a HD-DVD player but it seems all the good movies are going to blueray. Casino Royle, Crank... Does anyone know which format 300 will be on? Just came to theaters but would be a blueray player just to see it in HD.xXHackettXxIt should be on both.
[QUOTE="TrueReligion_"]It has the most support, and best movies.DazKuruptyup, more major movie studios support blu ray then do hd-dvd. I think it was like 5 out of 8 support blu ray or something vs 3 out of 8 for hd. I forget exact #s but something like that. Of the majors Fox, Sony(MGM, Colombia, Tristar, etc), and Disney-Buena Vista exclusively support Bluray. Universal exclusively supports HD-DVD. Paramount and Warner support both.
[QUOTE="2largeadults"][QUOTE="daytona_178"]it doesn't matter which one you like hd-dvd is finished check the newsI was just wondering why Blue-Ray is so hyped up..... i mean iv heard it cant be read from as fast as a HD-DVD, and i know it has more space... but i dont think games developers could actually fill all that space up. But im not too smart so please tell me which one you like and why.
P.S. im not a Microsoft fanboy.... I have a PC, and a DS Lite... Im neutral!
Brown52
pwnd
That player is severly gimped. It cannot fully make use of all of HD-DVD's features. It's reviews have been less than stellar.
[QUOTE="ramey70"][QUOTE="tango90101"]Have you been hiding under a rock for the past few months? The real knock on HD-DVD now is that nothing is being released for it and Universal (HD-DVD's big exclusive studio) has nothing big slated for heard release in the future. Disney and Fox both have monster schedules upcoming for Bluray. For the talk of people being fanboys it might be advantageous to do a little research yourself before you begin to appear as one yourself.the only one's who truly think bluray is better are the fanboys who simply don't know any better...
i love the obscure links they bring up to try to prove bluray is somehow going to be a success, when everyone knows it's bound for obscurity as betamax was....
blurays is more costly than hd dvd with no discernable advantage to warrant the extra $300.....
hd dvd has lower authoring costs leaving greater profits for the movie makers.
The real proof is the fact that of all the supposed "support" that bluray has, there jsut doesn't seem like that many movies are being re-released in bluray....
it's a bad idea from the onset..... too much, too soon....:(
tango90101
i guess you simply forgot about WB re-releasing many, many of their older titles on hd dvd...
meanwhile you're simply counting new releases....
ps... porn is backing hd dvd...buh bye bluray..;)
it wouldn't hurt you to do a bit more research before posting again...;)
Porn will be available on Bluray as well. Either way, porn will be a non-factor this generation due to the internet. In the Betamax-VHS war the only real way to get full video porn in the home was via those two formats. Not so today. And best of all, porn on the interent can be had for free. Regarding WB's old releases, many of those will also be available on Bluray, if not all as they are a dual format supporter. Further, when I say new releases I don't just mean new movies. Disney and Fox are also going back in their extensive catalouge to release movies as well. I'm more into home theater than I am gaming. I spend far more time at AVS than I do here. I could care less which format "wins" but at this point all signs are pointing to Bluray probably winning. Even on AVS, the HD-DVD supporters have pretty much thrown in the towel and see the writing on the wall.Have you been hiding under a rock for the past few months? The real knock on HD-DVD now is that nothing is being released for it and Universal (HD-DVD's big exclusive studio) has nothing big slated for heard release in the future. Disney and Fox both have monster schedules upcoming for Bluray. For the talk of people being fanboys it might be advantageous to do a little research yourself before you begin to appear as one yourself.the only one's who truly think bluray is better are the fanboys who simply don't know any better...
i love the obscure links they bring up to try to prove bluray is somehow going to be a success, when everyone knows it's bound for obscurity as betamax was....
blurays is more costly than hd dvd with no discernable advantage to warrant the extra $300.....
hd dvd has lower authoring costs leaving greater profits for the movie makers.
The real proof is the fact that of all the supposed "support" that bluray has, there jsut doesn't seem like that many movies are being re-released in bluray....
it's a bad idea from the onset..... too much, too soon....:(
tango90101
P.S. I've also heard of a four-layered HD-DVD with 60GB and maybe an eight-layered version with 120GB.
HD DVD has better image quality????....best stop talking about things u obviously know bugger all about!...Blu-Ray has a larger capacity and it has more companies and technology backing it than HDDVD.....jonnythefoxxI'm sure you hang out at AVSForums a lot too :roll: I actually do hang out on a lot on the AVSforums. The 200GB Bluray isn't in the "works", as it's actually existed for some time. HD-DVD is rumored to be developing a 51GB triple layered disc. However, it won't be read by any HD-DVD player currently on the market. And yes, the previously poster was correct in stating that the image quality difference between HD-DVD and Bluray is now a wash.
Log in to comment