Um pc for sure, seen as you can make it as immersive as you want.jt8b2z

Ain't that the truth. I've seen some setups for Microsoft Flight Simulator that is more immersive than the 360, PS3, or Wii could ever hope to be.

[QUOTE="jimm895"]I don't think it will happen because the extra data needed will not fit on the HD DVD with out compressing it causing a loss in quality. The Blu-Ray is using a much larger amount of space and it doesn't hace to be compressed onto the disc thus keeping the quality at it's peak.rwbojorquez

Do you know that most blu-ray movies are on 25 gigs disc and hd-dvd are on 30 gigs. go to your nearest store and find out is on the box on the back.

Actually most recent and newer releases of Bluray movies are on the 50GB dual layer discs.

rofl i thought PS3 was supposed to do 120fps and 4d?? how long till devs "unlock teh full potential" cows?gamergeekgeek

It took the same devs 3 years to get 60fps on the 360 version. Why not afford the PS3 the same amount of time?

Nope. I play games, not systems.foxhound_fox

Same here. Depending on what I'm playing at the moment determines how much of a "fan" of a particular system I am. I popped in WarioWare last night for the first time and for the first time since owning all three systems I might be leaning to the Wii. I wasn't even excited about that game when Gamefly sent it to me (bottom of my queue). Pleasant surprise.

meh . . i was hoping that EA would resove all of these types of issues with the PS3 version, but I guess not. This is a bit of a letdown on EA's part--they couldve done better.biggamerhk

Why should EA work much harder to satisfy such a small userbase?

Holy **** 9.0!!!

Yes! I nknew it wold be good this year.

MikeE21286

In my biased Longhorn opinion, it should be 9.0 simply because the greatest college football player of all time is on the cover.

[QUOTE="REforever101"]

i dont get y this happens

isnt the ps3 more powerful?

or is it just bad programming when porting or something

mikasa

He's why it happened...PS3 is NOT more powerful where it counts--Gaming Power. In other words the cell is great for folding @ home and things like that, but most of its power is lost on game code. And the real issue here is the GPU. The GPU in the 360 is more powerful than the GPU in the PS3. And this proves it.

How does this prove it? If the 09 version of Madden is still at 30fps then you could make a case.

i dont get y this happens

isnt the ps3 more powerful?

or is it just bad programming when porting or something

REforever101

I don't think it's "bad" programming or what have you. It took 3 versions before the 360 was able to run the game at 60fps and it's easier to develope for than the PS3. Further why would EA put in the extra effort for a PS3 version with such a small userbase? It's not sensible economically. And the PS3 isn't more powerful than the 360, despite what Sony and its fans tell you.