the only problem I have with this is that Beckham is total garbage, obviously he plays over here but Adidas have players like Kaka, Gerrard.....so many players that are 100x better than Beckham who is average at best.
what Brady was working with was nothing compared to what Peyton has to work with, Young had to work with, Montana..........the receivers on Brady's team were not in the same league as those guys.
they still had to put enough points on the board though - Brady done that extremely well especially on those 2 minute drives that he led the Pats on (including in the superbowl which is ultimate clutch) with no great receivers is pretty special.
yeah Branch is a pretty good receiver (the other WR's on the Pats roster were just so bad that Branch looked better than he was) - Marvin, Jerry and every other great rceiver those QB's had are way better than Branch which is why I think so highly of what Brady has been able to accomplish.
it was 300,000 at that time but it is up over 750,000 now - that is huge for the NFL in terms of global marketing and merchandising and it would mean more football which I ain't mad at.
to me it is, what Brady has done without any great receivers is incredible IMO - Peyton has Marvin, Young had Rice..........every other great QB had an equally good receiver to throw to except Brady who has still been able to lead a team to 3 superbowl victories.
I wouldn't change it due to the complications that will come with it but I do see why they are thinking about it........the London game generated 300,000 ticket requests in 2 days so it will be a huge deal for the NFL and that is why they want to do it.
Log in to comment