Hello gamers, its not often that i read reviews by overpaid biased Critics, i do occasionally read gamespot ones and IGN ones and ive noticed one thing that seperates the two, today i strolled over the Two sites for Reviews on Ubisofts newest title Assassins Creed and i noticed it recieved positive feedback from gamespot and other similar sites (9.0 / 4.5 / 5 ) all around that mark i check IGN Uk and IGN US to see that they have given it a 7. sumthing and a 6.5 which in my books is bad, almost pimp my ride bad... meaning do not buy bad..... what about IGN AU well they had great concise feedback whereas their UK and US counterparts slandered a game that is healthy to the Video Game industry it is full of bias and un informative comments that reek of imperfection and lack of experience, ive had to here with IGN's Wii Fanboyisms and constant disregard for xbox360 and PS3 which are all equally players in the industry too, instead of promoting a wealth in Industry they slander a AAA title for their own self embelishment it may seem like nothing but millions of people visit these sites daily and make informed decisions based on what people think and its Sites like IGN than can potentially make or brake the game and respective industry say if at least 500,000 people decide to buy Pro Street instead of Assassins that can potentially have long term effects on the games we see in 2 - 3 years, andi certainly dont wont to see heaps more Need For speeds coming out every yearthat always are just short of the mark that merits EA standard Quality
in short, that is why i prefer gamespot, and the occasional pop ok Kotaku and Qj
thanks for reading now back to some Call Of Duty 4 and Guitar Hero III
Log in to comment