It's the little things that matter in this, I've noticed. Both systems are compareably alright if you're not huge into the little, tiny detail. Otherwise it looks like the PS3 is catching up, thank god. Btw, I'm an XBox360 person, but it's good to know that the PS3 is closing in on the Xbox360 now in terms of graphic minute detail. Remember when it first came out? It was a bad time for PS3 when it was being graphically compared to Xbox360. Played MGS4 as well, graphically it's a good game, which I think looks stronger then any other Xbox360 game I've yet seen. I think when a development studio is concentrating only on the PS3 they put the PS3 capabilities to good use. When they are doing multi-platform though then they concentrate only on the Xbox, but I think it's because most of the tools they use are built around Microsoft, the game is then converted into a PS3 build. Anyway, I'll stop rambling. Just wanted to end saying both are no better, nor worse then each other and it's good to see the PS3 catching up.
*RazorBlankGiga* Sounds good! I'm going to be getting a laptop with a lightly better graphics card, and if it works pretty well with it then I might give Warhammer a try. Sadly, there is no Necrons. I'm a 40K person myself.
Guild Wars isn't on this because you have to pay to actually access and play the game. All the games listed above are totally free without even the need to purchase the software to access the game.
rotnem's comments