PS2 was $100 more expensive than Dreamcast and debuted a year later than Dreamcast. The launch titles for PS2 were generally laughably bad. Yet, PS2 sold like hotcakes and buried the Dreamcast in sales. GameCube came out a year after PS2 with a $100 cheaper price tag, yet GameCube got buried as well as Xbox.
Fast forward to today. PS3 comes out with a price tag $200 higher than 360, and it is failing. The games aren't great, but neither were the initial PS2 games.
So, PS2 comes out a year after Dreamcast with a $100 higher price tag and sells like mad.
PS3 comes out a year after Xbox 360 with a $200 higher price tag and sells poorly.
This leads me to believe that if PS3 debuted at $500, it would destroy the 360 in sales. But wait...it did. There were 2 models of PS3 at first. The $500 version was one of those models.
So, PS3 did debut $100 higher than 360, and sold poorly. PS2 debuted $100 higher than Dreamcast and sold incredibly well. Also, 360 is set to obliterate the original Xbox sales with a $400 price tag. But Sony couldn't sell a $500 version of their console? What gives??
AvIdGaMeR444
m8, theres is no point what so ever to this whole post??!! u've quoted figures and made wild statements. i dont understand what ur getting at. you're obviously a fanboy of something but your statements dont make it entirely clear what u are a fanboy of.
i think u actually like sony and ps3 but u dont understand why its not selling well compared to the ps2 which also did not sell wel... what? wait thats not right.
u like the xbox360 because it is out selling the ps3 but the ps3 is way more expensive and has crappy titles...?
in correlation to the distance between the moon and the sun and taking into account the gravitation pull of the earth i came to the conclusion that I'M HARDER THAN YOU!!!
XBOX360 PWNS LAWLLLLL ROFLS!
Log in to comment