@ dave0015 "Thats what games are for, doing things that u cannot do in real life" Yea... that's exactly what this whole article is about. A moral choice for Fallout 3 for example. Either activate a nuclear bomb and blow up a town and earn plenty of cash and such, or save the town and its people but deactivating the bomb in the town. Can you do that in real life? no... halfwit...
Firstly, lower game price, secondly, our net is so bad you would be lucky to illegally download 2 new games a month before your net is slowed to a crawl. However, in other countries, low game price + fast internet with pretty much no cap = everyones happy. I pay for games from small developers or ones that are actually worth what you are paying for and so good downloading it at the end of the month so your internet doesnt get capped is too much of a wait so you have to get it asap which is forking out an overpriced sum. For pc games, a $100 pc game sold in australia (going from pre-economic crisis exchange rates AUS-US) would be the equivalent of buying two in the US ($50). Well, if you dont see the problem, stop crying.
all you fellaz dont know what you are talkin about, people criticized xp when it came out, but now look. example: "XP has so many errors" I did not upgrade to vista, but I upgraded my computer, sure it uses up a lot of RAM, but with vista 32-bit my 4gb of RAM is only a small bite taken out. I do look in horror at the odd fps from SP1 and normal vista. DX10, does add a lot more stuff McJugga, ever played crysis? downloaded the dx10 patch to COH? just to let you know, the dx10 patch adds a lot more litter objects, quote from the patch details "thousands more". It is very different to dx9, do some homework before you go rambling about stuff. I do agree, vista is a component muncher atm and very bad for games regarding fps. However, vista has little to none errors at the moment, a very polished piece of code.
sanjeev3's comments