@n0matter: In regards to what you’re saying I can't see why people can’t view games objectively, comparing it to food is just dumb. You can play a game you don't like/aren’t fond of and see things that are good about it, but you can't really eat something and pick out the individual flavours you like/dislike, or at least most people can't.

I have no problems with looking at games objectively. There's plenty of genres I don't enjoy playing but when I watch other people play them I can see what makes them good and why other people enjoy them. But maybe that's just me. For example, I hate playing fighting games, I'm bad at them and I get no joy from playing them; but I can watch the gameplay of them and understand stuff like fluid combat, character variation, story, etc. It really isn't that hard to not like something but see why other people would.

As I said, other than complaining about the difficulty of the game the review did mention some good points. All they had to do was say something along the lines of I'm not fond of the difficulty of the game, my personal ranking is 4/10, but if it was easier for me I could easily see myself giving it maybe a 7/10 or 7.5/10. If you enjoy the old games or difficult games in general then you’ll enjoy Ghosts 'n Goblins Resurrection.

But if you don't think people are capable of being objective then my other suggestion was to have a second brief ranking from someone who actually enjoys difficulty. They don't need a second review because this one already gives some good info on the matter of the game.

Here is some constructive criticism. Overall this review does a great job of explaining stuff on this game. But, when you have someone review a game and by the end of the review there is a particular thing that really bothers them about it (in this case difficulty) at the then of the review they should have to reviews. A biased one, stating why they are being biased and an objective one. Here is an example from me. I absolutely loved The Legend of Zelda Skyward Sword, to me its a clear 10/10 and my favourite in the series. I also think OOT is a bit overrated, in my list of best in the series it ranks somewhat low, but that is my PERSONAL opinion. From an objective standpoint, SS has a lot of flaws, like forced motion controls, an abysmally long opening, and very linear gameplay, these don't bother me at all, but I can understand why it bothers others. So objectively I'd give it 7-7.5/10. It's still a solid game but has some glaring flaws. OOT on the other hand without my personal enjoyment affecting the outcome is without a doubt a nigh perfect creation, easy 10/10, if there is anything you could think of to improve this game I'd like to hear it. So with all that said, when you have a biased review they need to either give 2 reviews and explain them on both ends or get a second person to give a short and unbiased review at the end. If you don't want to get as much hate as you do sometimes I think you should give my idea some thought, but ultimately I'm not a writer/reviewer and it's really up to you.