2. Different reviewer but same page/magazine. Values should be similar across the board. Or are we reading opinions here of random people and not serious reviews that represent the Gamespot brand now? Good to know then.
Gamespot has become a joke lately. Personally i dont follow their reviews anymore. I think they all are trying to cater to the twitter community and to Fortnite type players:
1. 8/10 when it was originally released and now 4/10 with all those personal complains from the reviewer?
2. Every game that doesnt have baby tutorial or that plays itself is nowdays being low scored by gamespot (noticed the trend earlier this year)
3. They only giving high scores to blockbuster games lately for w/e reason.
4. IGN gave this same game a 9/10. How it is even possible to deviate from the other big reviewer by 50%.
@iandizion713: yeah i guess she ranked them all low based on her open dislike for micromanaging, collecting and turn based battles. The review felt like the personal opinion of someone who dislikes RPGs, more than an actual review of the game for what it is. Believe me i would rank most FPS below 7, even the blockbuster ones, i know her struggle.
This was a terrible review. Reviewer basically says that she hated the game because collecting monsters, micromanaging their stats and turnbased battles didnt interest her through the game. Then why the *** are you reviewing an old-school based RPG? Go review Titanfall o something.
serpentaurus' comments