Surely the reason GTAIV scored 10's across the board can be partly attributed to hype, mainly because reviewers probably felt safe giving it AAAA without having to suffer too much internet-whining. But does that mean it does not deserve the scores?
Gta IV IS the best GTA to date. It improved so vastly on every core aspect of the franchise, with shooting and driving mechanics, story, missions and detail of the enviroment being so much better as to make the previous installments almost laughable in comparison. GTAIV is also the first game on a scratch-built engine, so naturally some of the extra bells and whistles that San Andreas had are going to be missing, mostly because they can't reuse models, textures and animations to save time on the maingame's production. As such i'd espect to see good use of arbitrary features like customization and sub-missions to be put to good use in the next installment.
Pretty much the only thing i truly missed in GTAIV was a wider selection of weapons and more random crime sub-missions like the breaking and entering from SA and robberies from VC.
Log in to comment