SilentRage20's forum posts

  • 30 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for silentrage20
SilentRage20

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By SilentRage20
Member since 2015 • 36 Posts

@illmatic87 said:

They're probably gonna make the next games in the Universe revolve around Ciri

If they do make a new game, Gearalt and Ciri wont be in it because :

*HUGE SPOILERS AHEAD*

In one of the endings Ciri dies and Geralt allows Drowners and Ghouls to kill him

Avatar image for silentrage20
SilentRage20

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 SilentRage20
Member since 2015 • 36 Posts
@ribstaylor1 said:

Ya I felt the same way. Until I started playing Life is strange which is bar far the best modernized version of point and click story game you use controller like any other game to walk around instead of clicking shit. It was the perfect side step in genre's and feel and the story and all it's outcomes will have you wanting more. It's a lot like the walking dead and game of thrones games but actually done well, with quality done lower end graphics and the game actually runs well instead of constant stuttering like both of those game I mentioned seem to have even on good hardware.

Yes the Witcher 3 and Life is Strange are the best games I played this year.

TW3 - Has very good content { story, length choices e.t.c } and I actually enjoyed the combat.

Life is Strange - This game has the best story ever and its filled with choices that can have extreme consequences.

Avatar image for silentrage20
SilentRage20

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 SilentRage20
Member since 2015 • 36 Posts

@pikachewbacca: If your pc can handle it and if you are fine with 30 fps and random lag then you should try ARK: Survival Evovled. Its still in its early stages so there are a few bugs. It does have some FPS parts but it is more of an adventure/survival game. If you get annoyed withe multiplayer you can still play privately with your friends or by yourself. The game looks amazing but it is very hard.

Requirements-

LOW - GTX 660

MEDIUM - GTX 770

HIGH - GTX 970

ULTRA - TITAN X

Avatar image for silentrage20
SilentRage20

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 SilentRage20
Member since 2015 • 36 Posts

@ronvalencia said:
@wis3boi said:
@ronvalencia said:
@silentrage20 said:

I know about the "communication error" NIVIDIA had and I know my GTX 970 has 3.5 gigs of VRAM but Total War: Attilla said different:

I only moved to PC gaming recently so i only know the basics, can someone please tell me why it says 3gigs instead of 3.5.

Thank You for taking the time read this, its much appreciated.

Nvidia Titan X reduce image quality cheating...

The root of the problem is the image quality setting in Nvidia control panel. Check the difference (and proof) here:

http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1041709168&postcount=84

There seems to be around 10% perf. drop after setting the quality to highest.

that has absolutely nothing at all to do with what he posted....

What goes around comes around.

http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1041709226&postcount=100

On AMD, default = higher quality, but it hurts performance.

On NV, default = worse quality, but it runs faster (10% according to BF4 tests).

Do a detailed analysis in recent games, image quality comparisons on default driver settings (since its what you test on), same settings in-game, same location. Then do it forced on quality in CC/NVCP.

You will get a ton of site hits from everyone interested in this issue. If it turns out to be true, then basically NV has "optimized" their way to extra performance for years at the expense of IQ.

Its good to know but its un-related to what i asked.

Thanks wis3boi, I was a bit worried.

Avatar image for silentrage20
SilentRage20

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 SilentRage20
Member since 2015 • 36 Posts

I know about the "communication error" NIVIDIA had and I know my GTX 970 has 3.5 gigs of VRAM but Total War: Attilla said different:

I only moved to PC gaming recently so i only know the basics, can someone please tell me why it says 3gigs instead of 3.5.

Thank You for taking the time read this, its much appreciated.

  • 30 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3