[QUOTE="mitu123"]

That's great about the load times, but what about the framerate?

nervmeister

Nope, it is a problem with the engine, and I don't see them getting around to changing it. Getting rid of the loading times is a big step though, and props to Sega for stepping up.

From what I can see, it is Sega's fault. I don't see anything wrong with keeping it exclusive. I actually think that would've been a route with more integrity than what they've done here, which is rushing a port that was good enough to run and then sell it for the same price. I would rather have seen this game go the route of NGS2 than have Sega pull what they did. I think if it came out exclusive, they might have taken into consideration how much a PS3 port would have sold and taken their time to actually do the port correctly more than the half-ass result we have now. All conjecture I know, but given the consistently high reviews of the 360 version, it seems like a likely outcome.

Also, before the NA release, they announced they'd be looking into the loading issues at the least. It's obvious they haven't and there haven't been any follow-ups to this. I have to guess it's a result of incompetence and indifference.

SONY, for deliberately making there machine an absolute cow to develope ondelta3074

What suprises me is that P* decides to develope Bayonetta for the 360 as an exclusive. Isn't the PS3 much more popular in Japan? I mean based from what I understood, the sales in Japan (regardless of the claimed superior version of the game), more copies of the PS3 version of Bayonetta have been sold by a lot. I know that P* is a small company and may not have had money or whatever the reason, it still is a bit shocking having a japanese company develop for an american console that isn't even popular in their own reigon.

WR_Platinum

Definitely Sony's fault. If Sony had did their part with the dev kits then the OTHER console wouldn't be chosen as the main developing console this gen. There's so many things that Sony could have done right..like start paying for exclusives, it'll help in the development of games, as well as make the PS3 much more of a must buy (which would make it's user base larger, therefore developer support would follow like the PS2 days). Also, they shouldn't have gone the cell route. There's already news the PS4 wont even have Cell tech in it, but a multicore CPU much like it's competitor. Just be happy Sega or Platinum Games even released it for the PS3, because it easily could have been an exclusive for another console.

gamer082009

[QUOTE="King-Tigre"]

Yeah honestly, who cares. The port isn't even as bad as they said it would be.

ViewtifulScott

It might be all of the above. I'm thinking Platinum Games just wanted to make Bayonetta only on the 360 but Sony wanted a piece and hired Sega to port it.

gago-gago

[QUOTE="skyrender4"]The link is not biased and is a simple, straight-up technical comparison. It's fine and all if you paid the same price for a CLEARLY (not even close) inferior version and enjoyed it, but people have a right to not be OK with this swindle.KapG

you created a new screen name just to troll on the ps3 boards with regards to bayonetta?

seems that way...

go troll elsewhere