After looking at all the screens now, I stand with my first assessment. The PS3 looks better to me, its the small details though that make me come to this conclusion. For the most part there are not a lot of differences, I will admit that and anyone who wants to play either system is inclined to do so because it is their prerogative to play what they like. I simply want to state the small differences that I see and yes they favor the PS3. If you look at the close ups in modern warfare 2, look at the gun scopes, the PS3 clearly looks better and the 360 always has that blur, which doesn't show the crispness of the weapon's metal casing. That blur hinders a lot of the images taken on the 360 so it shows me that it is the system and not the camera they used to take the picture. The blur on the 360 also hinders every other image that they showed in this article. I don't know how they couldn't notice that at all in their comparisons, it shows they do favor the 360 over the PS3

Maybe it's just me, but the 360 looks like it has a slight blurry film on all the images and then the PS3 looks more crisp. Also the models look more detailed on the PS3. I just looked at the Assassins Creed II pics but if you look at the main characters hair it looks more detailed, also that blur that I see hinders the 360 from rendering everything the way the PS3 brings out the crispness of the colors. Outdoors its a little harder to tell but the character models still look better on the PS3