[QUOTE="soul_04"]'Final Fantasy I–II was the last cartridge Square released for the original Family Computer, in early 1994, and was released in a limited edition box include various bonuses, include maps and hint books. It was never officially released outside of Japan.' taken directly from your link hewkii, proving i was right and thats wat he was comparing as the dates coincide. And chichi stop being a fanboy and having nerdgasms over imaginary ownage.Hewkii
that's my point. they weren't the originals. the originals were released ~6-7 years before this collection. Sorry didnt realise how i phrased my first post ^^, i thought u were trying to disprove that it was in fact ff1&2 that was being compared ^^, Sorry mate =].
'Final Fantasy I–II was the last cartridge Square released for the original Family Computer, in early 1994, and was released in a limited edition box include various bonuses, include maps and hint books. It was never officially released outside of Japan.' taken directly from your link hewkii, proving i was right and thats wat he was comparing as the dates coincide. And chichi stop being a fanboy and having nerdgasms over imaginary ownage.
'Final Fantasy I–II was the last cartridge Square released for the original Family Computer, in early 1994, and was released in a limited edition box include various bonuses, include maps and hint books. It was never officially released outside of Japan.' taken directly from your link hewkii, proving i was right and thats wat he was comparing as the dates coincide. And chichi stop being a fanboy and having nerdgasms over imaginary ownage.
[QUOTE="soul_04"][QUOTE="Hewkii"]why are the dates for FF in the early 90s?Hewkii
Because its comparing FF1&2 to blue dragon. The tc was merely trying to point out how most new rpgs start out a bit slow =]. but the first FF was released in 1987. I'm just going off what it says on the link. When you click on it near the top it says which games its comapring, and it says its comparing FF1 &2 to bluedragon. Also right next to were it says the date it states its ff1&2 as well.
The graphics and scenery thus far look amazing and gameplay looks alright lol, its an interesting battle system they have going there. But as for now, at least until more information comes out im a bit more interested in blue dragon or lost odyssey.
[QUOTE="WheresMyChippy"]Hmm PC is GPU bound. So if I stick an 8800GT in to a Pentium 166 I can play Supreme Commander? Ohhhh wait thats right, there is far more to games than just processing the graphics! And to push a lot of polygons you still need a powerful CPU. So it could more accurately be said that a powerful GPU is worthless without a powerful CPU to back it up? This is where the PS3 shines; the Cell has more than enough power to push it's GPU to the max, unlike the 360 CPU.....WheresMyChippy
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. So don't.
Oh so you are saying I can pop a modern day graphics card in to an old CPU system and the only limiting factor will be the GPU? Because that is what the TC is saying. Please understand the issue before you tell me I don't know what I'm talking about. No, he's saying that the gpu is more important, and for graphics.. which he is predicting will be the better aspect of the 360 version, he is right.
Log in to comment