Do they TRY to actually convey what is really going on? This is the WORST comparison screen shots I`ve ever seen thus far. I don`t think its much to explain that the PS3 does have better graphics over-all. But does that really matter? I guess for some yeah, but for me its more about the games themselves. Why not compare how the controller is better for one than the other. That would be more helpful and get more "arguments" out of than this crap. And what about people who don`t have HD? And so on and so forth. And I would have to agree with Jafool, hahaha.
Sounds interesting, I am sure my buddy will be getting a few of these. Its neat that Nintendo constantly builds up its already great hardware, without even being asked too.
For being so much more powerful, PS3 hasn`t really shown much. At least not in these pics. Is PS3 ever going to come out with a game that will truly so its power? Or will the 360 and PS3 only differ with controllers and a bit of blurriness?
Wow! Halo 3 rocks! But all the others still look great, I mean Halo 1 is old compared to Halo 3. Bungie did and still knows how to do a great job. Congrats!
I don`t think is was too bad. I mean there were a LOT of awesome games for every system, including Halo 3, the final Metal Gear, Wii Zapper stuff (Prime 3), some great PS3 games and of course the PS3 price mark down. It wasn`t "WHAM" LIGHTS" GIRLS" Flasy, it was about the best games coming out for the best systems.
1.Super Mario Bro. (Its-a-me, a-Mario) 2.Legend of Zelda (Adventure. 3.Kirby (the easiest game of ALL TIME!!) 4.Chip and Dale RR (yes,number three,its awesome!!!) 5.Dungons and Dragons (I love those two bosses you can kick off the convery belt. Ha,ha,ha.) Honorable. Jackel (you can run people OVER!!!!) The Lone Ranger (Away Silver, AWAY!!!) Big Nose the Caveman (it was in Gold)
strawberryheart's comments