These answers are appreciated. If I canmake game saves what is the method? Furthermore, how can and is it even possible to gaet the game saves from the hard drive onto the 360.
Apparently reading and comprehension do not go together. Lets get a firm understanding. We all agree it takes developers some time to pump out nice games. The Wii plays GC games. The Wii is more powerful than the GC. That is as far as we can all agree.
So if these truths are in effect we can then conclude that Monster 4x4 should have never been released on this system because it looks like a N64 game. Also the launch titles that were available should at least look like GC launch titles. But we will hear the same old wait till this and that.
I have to agree with you wholeheartedly. A good example of the laziness of developers compared with what they are actually capable of can be seen in a great Gamecube launch title, Star Wars: Rogue Squadron 2. That game, hands down, looks much better than anything anyone has offered on Wii. They should all be ashamed of themselves, Nintendo included.patriel_m
I started a thread maybe 2 years ago about the weak graphical presentation given to us in the form of twilight princess and I got a lot of flack. Every game should be or par with RE4 period. I totally agree with this guy and this quote here... Most of if not all of GC launch titles looked much better than this wii stuff. I wont say the N64 had better looking games but a lot of the wii stuff reminds me of N64 titles.
I have the official LAN adapter but I discovered that with it I still cannot connect. I have dsl run the cord straight to the modem still won't connect because I have to use password and user name when connecting to internet. ANy suggestions?
That is what I am saying. Right on point. RE4 set the bar for games in the last cycle. Wii games should at least look like that. period jbrittain
You really shouldn't have bought a Wii if you didn't know what you were getting into ahead of time. The fact is that the Wii is capable of making games better looking than RE4, but you have to give the devs some time. Most developers were just given a Gamecube kit and Wii-mote to create their first gen games, not to mention that Ubisoft just created a crapload of ports. No one really knew what the official specs of the Wii would be until it was too late to make launch. Zelda looks better than anything on Gamecube, so there you go. That's your graphical powerhouse for Wii right now. You want more? Wait for Metroid Prime 3, Super Mario Galaxy, and Super Smash Bros Brawl. Those games will all push the Wii to its limits. If you want better looking games than that, you're going to have to buy a 360 or PS3, but I seriously hope you didn't buy the Wii for its graphics, because if you did then you wasted your money.
If you read my other stuff you will understand. I bought the Wii for its ability to deliver quality gaming experiences. I am sure you would not want this to pump out Battle Arena Toshindin graphics right... Zelda was orginally slated for GameCube and it looks like it. Nintendo IMO should have refined it to meet the capabilities of the device well beyond the controller. Zelda does not look better than anything on the Cube, but it looks better than a lot of games developed for it. Eternal Darkness, RE4, Splinter Cell, Killer7, I can go on Metroid Prime 1+2, RE1 remake. Wind Waker are all games that demonstrated the power of the cube and there are more titles. I am aware that developers need time but when the news given stated that it plays gamecube games and it is twice as powerful then the those who had made games for the cube should have pumped out high quality cube like titles.( with the kits they had...) I really dont think you understand. IF Zelda were re-done graphically to use the Wii's graphical capabilities to its fullest, then we wouldn't have gotten it for another year. It was originally made for Gamecube, period. I'm glad that we got it now.. I would have been seriously pissed if I had to wait another year so people would stop complaining about teh graphics!11 Zelda TP is as high quality of a game as could possibly be made for Gamecube, straight up. You will see high quality games for Wii later, but you're really not giving people a chance. These devs have been spending all of their resources trying to figure out how the Wii remote works, not pushing the graphics. And since when has any system launched with games that used all of its power or abilities? Never. By the way, the title of this thread should have been changed to another one of the million "Wii graphics sux!1!11@" Because that's all this is about. There are plenty of good fun games for the Wii, but yea, none of them are using its full graphical capabilities yet. You're gonna have to wait for that.
I really do understand, I am not complaining about the graphics, I have made an observation and formed an opinion. I feel that the a game needs graphical presentation that appeals to those who purchase the machine and gameplay mechanics that refresh the gameplay experience. Zelda was a port but it is not the best output capable on Cube and certainly not the best on the Wii. I am aware that it takes time to developgames but the Wii has Cube capabilities so the games should look much better. Are you Telling me that GT game is impressive looking? You don't understand you are defending something that cannot be defended. The lack of effort to put out decent looking games by some companies. You cannot deny it. The crappiest first generation titles for Cube looked much better than most of the stuff for the Wii right now.
That is what I am saying. Right on point. RE4 set the bar for games in the last cycle. Wii games should at least look like that. period jbrittain
You really shouldn't have bought a Wii if you didn't know what you were getting into ahead of time. The fact is that the Wii is capable of making games better looking than RE4, but you have to give the devs some time. Most developers were just given a Gamecube kit and Wii-mote to create their first gen games, not to mention that Ubisoft just created a crapload of ports. No one really knew what the official specs of the Wii would be until it was too late to make launch. Zelda looks better than anything on Gamecube, so there you go. That's your graphical powerhouse for Wii right now. You want more? Wait for Metroid Prime 3, Super Mario Galaxy, and Super Smash Bros Brawl. Those games will all push the Wii to its limits. If you want better looking games than that, you're going to have to buy a 360 or PS3, but I seriously hope you didn't buy the Wii for its graphics, because if you did then you wasted your money.
If you read my other stuff you will understand. I bought the Wii for its ability to deliver quality gaming experiences. I am sure you would not want this to pump out Battle Arena Toshindin graphics right... Zelda was orginally slated for GameCube and it looks like it. Nintendo IMO should have refined it to meet the capabilities of the device well beyond the controller. Zelda does not look better than anything on the Cube, but it looks better than a lot of games developed for it. Eternal Darkness, RE4, Splinter Cell, Killer7, I can go on Metroid Prime 1+2, RE1 remake. Wind Waker are all games that demonstrated the power of the cube and there are more titles. I am aware that developers need time but when the news given stated that it plays gamecube games and it is twice as powerful then the those who had made games for the cube should have pumped out high quality cube like titles.( with the kits they had...)
Log in to comment