Lack of prone is annoying, and the gunplay is inferior to MW2
kevy619
Agreed
Say what you want about MW2 but when it comes to the handling of the guns and movement, very few can touch the CoD series.
Im not sure how annyone feels that way, other than that you have to shoot in short burts in bc2.
Because the guns handle worse than they should, take up too much room on the screen, takes way too many bullets to down someone. You'd think with the effort they went too to put in semi realistic bullet physics that they'd put in a damage model that makes sense instead it feels like you're shooting mints at the enemy.
The gunplay just isn't as satisfying as it could of been.
The score is fair, but what's with this idiotic video review?
I like how he says "YEAH, MULTIPLAYER IS THE MAIN FOCUS OF THIS GAME" at the very beginning, and then proceeds to talk about singleplayer for almost the entire review. What a joke.
kaealy
Yeaaaah, that struck me as well.. So Modern warfare 1 & 2 was the first multiplayer game with perks and such? And what throne is he talking about? I never knew MW1 & 2 brought so much to the FPS genre.
Probably something to do with the fact that Modern Warfare 2 is the most played FPS game on the PS3 and 360 and before that it was Modern Warfare 1. That's the throne.
You get a SSD for like your operating system hard drive, then get a couple of raptors and put them in raid for your game hard drives. Then just have big regular hard drives for data storage and even older less demanding games.
Considering one scouting fleet is the largest common threat amongst every race in the galaxy (with the exception of maybe the necrons), I think Tyranids win and rightfully so.
Hell the Deathwatch would mop the floor with the Zerg and not even they can do much against they Tyranids.
Log in to comment