TheGreatGeneral's forum posts

Avatar image for thegreatgeneral
TheGreatGeneral

717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#1 TheGreatGeneral
Member since 2014 • 717 Posts

@clyde46 said:

I thought consolites didn't care about resolution and graphics?

And I thought herms dont care about consoles? So why are there always butthurt wannabe mustards in console threads?

Anyway, by now everybody should know that the PS4 is just superior and only the most delusional fanboys are wating for a miracle that will never happen.

Avatar image for thegreatgeneral
TheGreatGeneral

717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#2  Edited By TheGreatGeneral
Member since 2014 • 717 Posts

I said that a month ago but nobody really reacted to it.

Here is what I posted about the Witcher 3 graphics.

@thegreatgeneral said:

@SteXmaN said:

In game screenshots.If you don't believe me here is another one with same location that was included in the gameplay demo and it is form the same set that you can find on PC Gamer. It's just not the same taking a screenshot when actually in-game and from a video even if it is a "uncompressed"(5GB,if I recorded with FRAPS that long it would be 50GB file) version and especially when the game has this kind of detail.

The two screen you posted are looking very good but not crazy good there are still bad spots and the second one has a lot of DOF.

I think people misunderstood me, I not saying its a bad looking game in general just that they didnt deliver on a consitent beautiful game.

Some parts are really good looking and some just plain bad.

Here are some cutouts from the screen I posted. Im posting cutouts because Im starting to believe nobody is actually opening the Image. This looks good to you? Are you guys blind or just droning?

Now here is a screen Cloud_imperium posted in The Order thread, this one looks very bad too. So have some more cutouts.

Here are some screens I took from gamersyde (5Gb but the quality is still not the best): http://www.gamersyde.com/download_the_witcher_3_wild_hunt_35_minutes_gameplay-32805_en.html

All in All I say The Witcher 3 is a good looking game but not mindblowing like some people here are chanting nonstop.

When the initial gameplay trailer looked like this I hope you can understand why I feel underwhelmed.

Avatar image for thegreatgeneral
TheGreatGeneral

717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#3 TheGreatGeneral
Member since 2014 • 717 Posts

Both will be great, but im more of a FF guy.

Funny, when you think about it people are actually waiting longer for Persona 5 than FFXV.

Avatar image for thegreatgeneral
TheGreatGeneral

717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#4 TheGreatGeneral
Member since 2014 • 717 Posts
@ghostwarrior786 said:

i havnt played type-0, the only ff game i played was crisis core. how different/similar is ff15 sounding to crisis core? because i really want it to play like that

Im not really sure how crisis core played anymore because its so long ago.

But I remember that I liked Type-0 more and hopefully FFXV will step it up even more.

Im not really worried about the shown gameplay because they are taking from the looks of it Type-0 as the basis and are adding more gameplay features like teamattacks, teleportation and a pause menu.

Avatar image for thegreatgeneral
TheGreatGeneral

717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5 TheGreatGeneral
Member since 2014 • 717 Posts
@clyde46 said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@ghostwarrior786: So... your hype is deflated because.... its not a "Oh look guys, lets all stand in a line and take turns to attack?" this looks pretty much like Kingdom Hearts to me with maybe more depth.... what the hell is wrong with that?

We already saw from gameplay that the main character is able to use multiple weapons at once, again what is wrong with that?

That is how JRPG's should be played.

Is that why you dont like the Souls games? Are you a traditional?

Avatar image for thegreatgeneral
TheGreatGeneral

717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#6  Edited By TheGreatGeneral
Member since 2014 • 717 Posts

You should play type-0 to see how they implemented auto attack because its really no big deal when you still have many options to fight how you want.

The character is using the normal attack in a loop there, but this would get you killed in a seconds with a strong enemy. You have to dodge the enemy attacks (dedicated evasive button there too) attack (options in term of holding the stick up, down or normal attack), cast spells (can be charged), use summons or ultimate magic (Need to make a decision before the mission starts). Then you can attack the enemy in a small time window to make critical damage (allows you to fight extremly hard enemies which should be impossible to beat at a certain level) and switch between characters on the fly.

You should really play FF-type-0 to get a sense of the combat style. This one looks more grounded and slowerpaced which im thankfull of because it can get really hectic in type-0.

The only thing I didnt like about this news is the deck system because I wanted to chose my weapons at any time myself.

But I like what im hearing about the pause function.

By the way, you are wrong about noctis being the only playable character.

Edit: Now that I think about it. Maybe you could just chose a single weapon in the deck and main that one then bringing up the menu and allocate another weapon.

Avatar image for thegreatgeneral
TheGreatGeneral

717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#7  Edited By TheGreatGeneral
Member since 2014 • 717 Posts
@remiks00 said:

@thegreatgeneral said:
@lostrib said:

@thegreatgeneral said:

I see that you rustled some jimmies with this thread OP.

At this point the witcher 3 doesn't look like anything special graphical wise, so its an easy win for FFXV and I agree with you. (At least the tech demo)

Too bad that the wannabe masterrace cant acknowledge that and still clings to old oversharpened gifs before gameplay showed much worse graphics.

Dont expect many real conversations in this thread when a PC game, that was hyped to hell and back for years, underwhelms in the graphical department.

Source? Because the Witcher 3 was only announced a year and a half ago

Then hyped to hell and back for a year and a half. Felt much longer.

Lol..dude, you realize that even if you're right about Witcher 3 being "hyped to hell and back for years" (which you are not), Final Fantasy Versus 13 ...I mean Final Fantasy XV has been hyped to hell a hell of a lot longer; since 2005. Fact

Difference being is that FFXV was hyped not for the graphics but for it to bring the FF-franchise back to form.

From the open world, like in the older games, to the the real time combat system they want to introduce.Those are some of the biggest reasons people were hyped about Versus 13 and still are for FFXV.

Nobody expected it to look this good when the groundwork was done for the PS3.

Avatar image for thegreatgeneral
TheGreatGeneral

717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#8 TheGreatGeneral
Member since 2014 • 717 Posts

I think so, because I dont see any games that get close to it in terms of high polish gameplay style other than Deep Down or a potential Dragons Dogma 2.

Maybe FFXV buts that looks more mainstream and simplistic.

Avatar image for thegreatgeneral
TheGreatGeneral

717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#9  Edited By TheGreatGeneral
Member since 2014 • 717 Posts
@lostrib said:

@thegreatgeneral said:
@lostrib said:

@thegreatgeneral said:

I see that you rustled some jimmies with this thread OP.

At this point the witcher 3 doesn't look like anything special graphical wise, so its an easy win for FFXV and I agree with you. (At least the tech demo)

Too bad that the wannabe masterrace cant acknowledge that and still clings to old oversharpened gifs before gameplay showed much worse graphics.

Dont expect many real conversations in this thread when a PC game, that was hyped to hell and back for years, underwhelms in the graphical department.

Source? Because the Witcher 3 was only announced a year and a half ago

Then hyped to hell and back for a year and a half. Felt much longer.

Who? sources please? Also, this is a multiplat so I don't know why you're singling out PC gamers for any form of hype, I'm sure there are console gamers that are excited for it on X1/PS4

What source do you want?

I know that its a multiplat but the most hype came from the PC crowd and its quite easy to understand why. Its because of the origin and where the sequels were released. Not to mention that the developers themselves see it as a PC game.

I agree that many console gamers are looking forward to the game.

Avatar image for thegreatgeneral
TheGreatGeneral

717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#10  Edited By TheGreatGeneral
Member since 2014 • 717 Posts
@lostrib said:

@thegreatgeneral said:

I see that you rustled some jimmies with this thread OP.

At this point the witcher 3 doesn't look like anything special graphical wise, so its an easy win for FFXV and I agree with you. (At least the tech demo)

Too bad that the wannabe masterrace cant acknowledge that and still clings to old oversharpened gifs before gameplay showed much worse graphics.

Dont expect many real conversations in this thread when a PC game, that was hyped to hell and back for years, underwhelms in the graphical department.

Source? Because the Witcher 3 was only announced a year and a half ago

Then hyped to hell and back for a year and a half. Felt much longer.