@The_Last_Ride: no and the thing i'd talk about last would be it's f'in specs. if you're talking specs than you might as well talk about pc vs consoles, in general. in fact, f consoles and this current generation.
you first denied that you said story. i have nothing against you thinking story. however, story, imo, is a worthless piece of crap when video games are judged. and, i mean worthless. in fact, i'd argue, a detriment. (tlou is my perfect example.)
here's my position: great gaming stories is ruining gaming gameplay. or, tlou sucks as a game, but, is perfectly pc and sucks as a story, as well.
@toast_burner: no, you said, "mostly it comes from the story."
i, too, want a game with a great story and i brought up tlou for a pretty obvious reason. to relegate your argument to the "not sure why you brought up tlou" bin is perfectly bargain.
tlou is a perfect example of a game with very good "cinematic presentation" getting the typical p.c. approval with almost zero innovation (again, i could care less about multi) and a forced and perfectly p.c. story and character development.
forgetting great gameplay is all on you. remembering "great" story is all on you.
@toast_burner: are tetris and pong classics? if you got rid of the story of bioshock and halo and creed and mass1 and arkhamcity are they classics?
story DOES NOT make a game a classic. tlou sucks because it's gameplay is rehashed and been there, done that. chaos theory is a classic game because it combined graphics and gameplay and kicked splintercell1's own arse.
the day people start grading video games on story and graphics and cinematic presentation and art is the day i say f u consoles. lol, what?
Log in to comment