[QUOTE="biribis"]Hi guys. I came here for some of your advice. When I bought my ps3, I bought a component cable and I used to play on a 21 " CRT. Three days ago, I bought a 720 p LCD HDTV and when comparing the video output of RCA Vs component I was amazed. The difference between 480 i and 720 p is big. Now I'm wondering if the difference between component Vs HDMI on this 720 p native resolution screen would be so notorious to be the excuse to invest on a HDMI cable which is somewhat expensive. Is there any substancial difference between HDMI and component cables playing at 720 P? I really appreciate your advices? thank you :)oymd
Ok now...everyone take a chill pill and cool down...
You never mentioned the size of your 720p screen...and it's native resolution...
Anyways...here's a quick overview of the A-V connections hierarchy....from worst to best...
- 75ohm Coaxial cable...we all used these back in the days when we used regular antennas that were connected directly to the TVs...those thick white cables with copper wire nets shielded from a central copper wire. Now they are used for DVB, from LNBs to your decoders.
- Regular RCA connections (Composite), the industry standard for almost ANY AV connection, yellow for video, red for right audio channel, and white for the left. LOWEST acceptable quality.
- S-Video, the one with the five pins (like on your laptop). Quiet a LOT BETTER than RCA.
- Component: 3 RCA connectors, RED, Green & Blue for VIDEO ONLY. If its a CONSOLE component cable, you get the additional red and white RCA cables for AUDIO.Component is sometimes called RGB connection. (SCART in Eurozone, but has a different connector...weird). MASSIVE improvement in quality over RCA and even S-Video. Many regard it as STILL THE STANDARD for high end videophiles.Which brings us to component's audio companion for home theatres:
- Optical cable\Toslink: Audio transmitted digitally\optically. Carries all audio standards within the track through one connection (Dolby 5.1\DTS\THX etc..., 5.1,6.1,7.1, and so on..) without the need for multiple audio inputs. Coaxial audio does a similar job.
- HDMI: the latest. Higher bandwidth. Main advantage is the CONVENIENCE, as the 5 connectors of component video PLUS Optical audio are replaced by ONE cable. Was MASSIVELY EXPENSIVE when introduced. now much much cheaper. Slight next to NO BENEFIT over Component on 720p displays. You MAY start noticing a difference on 1080p, but size will matter here. Actually, many Home Theatre specialists STILL prefer component over HDMI. There's also the issue of HDCP.
In your case...I can imagine the MASSIVE improvement from Composite to Component. The jump to HDMI would not be worth it IMO, even if you have a cable for free. You will not notice it, especially on 720p
Cheers...hope this help anyone who was thinking about what those damn connections are about. This is by no means the whole story...just the commonest
As for the guy who insists that HDMI would help a lot...you r definitely not a NOOB here on GS forums...but in A-V stuff...sorry my friend...you are...
read some over here:
AVforums
AVS forums
High Definition forums....
and many more...
I have no idea where my comments went after I used the quote, but to sum it up:
Why do you guys keep saying Darth is insisting that HDMI is way better than component? He's not.
Anyway, I'll point out that you're number one is wrong biribis. 75-ohm coax can actually be used to make your own component cables that have the exact same quality as store bought component cables. You can take 75-ohm coax and put F to Phono plug adapters on them and use them as component cables. Don't believe me? Do some research, it does work. It works because component cables are made with a 75-ohm cable.
Log in to comment