@LightRukia: "You can't make a game where you can kill and molest little kids and use the "it's just a game" and expect it not to get banned in probably everywhere."
Sure...it won't be sold in stores.
But they can still make it.
"Of course people want throw around it's art like art shouldn't be criztize(Criticized) "
And I didn't say people can't criticize games/art. Way to strawman.
"Developers though like I said unless they're indie don't have creative freedom to do what they want like naive gamers want to believe."
So....devs can make what they want...except when they have restrictions(publishers mainly).
What's your point? To strawman me and bring in extreme examples that do not prove me wrong?
They can make what they want...and have the choice to A.) Join a company that tells them what to do(they ARE employed) B.)Make an AO game and have it only be available online.
Again...they DO have the choice to do what they want(that includes publishers). You've even said it yourself.
Edited to add: I never said "always" either. Maybe next time don't put words into people's mouths?
Gaming needs to get rid of the patriarchy....and every game should be a history on how women have been chattel... Literally chattel! Just a few 100 years ago!
"hm, sounds like they are trying to replicate was home does for ps3, just a lot less flashy. nice job Microsoft, always original" ummm...and home isn't replicating live? mmm ok.
vecha's comments