veggidudevorce's forum posts

Avatar image for veggidudevorce
veggidudevorce

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 veggidudevorce
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
Not to mention with GT5 you can have more cars on the track at the same time (which eats up power) than in Forza 3 but still have better graphics. GT5 > Forza 3, graphically. And it's not a small margin.
Avatar image for veggidudevorce
veggidudevorce

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 veggidudevorce
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
I have a mouse, keyboard, and screen already. But I need the rest. How do I get the most for my money? PS: a friend will build it for me. I just need to buy the parts. Good sound is not as important as graphics. Just FYI. Thanks if you take your time to give advice.
Avatar image for veggidudevorce
veggidudevorce

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 veggidudevorce
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="EG101"]

What the Cows don't understand about Gears 3 is that not only are the graphics beautiful, smooth (msaa),has excellent lighting (check out the video on live), while displaying tons of large, medium and small enemies in large enviroments but it ALSO has Split screen coop for the entire campaign. That means that the 360 does all this times 2. You can also play over Xbox live using splitscreen. If that is not impressive then I don't know what is. All this on 5 year old hardware.

PAL360

This is true. I love how most shooters on 360 favours splitscreen coop over graphics. Well, im glad Reach and Gears3 have both!

Graphics are only effected when you choose to play split screen. Not when you choose to play single player. I love how people think including split screen causes an overall downgrade of graphics in the game. Single player graphics are not effected by the inclusion of the option to play the game split screen.
Avatar image for veggidudevorce
veggidudevorce

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 veggidudevorce
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
The effects? The models? The animations? Exactly what in GeOW3 is better than this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tA4Yegsd5OU
Avatar image for veggidudevorce
veggidudevorce

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 veggidudevorce
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
This thread is fail. Gears of War 3 doesn't come close to this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tA4Yegsd5OU The models. The effects. The environment. The animations. Gears of War 3 looks way inferior to Uncharted 2.
Avatar image for veggidudevorce
veggidudevorce

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 veggidudevorce
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
This is a demo from 4 years ago: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehwFOM4CBKA Rendering graphics using only the SPUs of the cell. The cell can do a lot of graphics work and RSX can offload a lot of work to the SPUs also. So your better graphics card doesn't mean anything, lemmings. The combination of cell + RSX blows the Xbox 360 out of the water! The only reason multiplatform games often don't look better on PS3 is because it's programmed for more conventional architecture and then just dumped on the RSX rather than optimized for the cell. So the RSX does the graphics and the Cell just regular CPU work. But that's not how it's upposed to be. They're meant to work together for the graphics. So a lot of PS3 power is wasted and left untapped.