I cant help but wonder, What is everyone expecting from a new call of duty game. I mean are you expecting ground breaking graphics with a top of the line story and a totally new multiplayer experience? I have lost track on how many CoD games are out there but at this point all i expect from them is maybe a new multiplayer mode, a few graphical touch ups and a single player campaign that i dont feel like throwing my controller through my tv after playing. I admit i picked it up this morning, played it for a few hours, then went back to playing assassins creed 4. I enjoyed it, and will play it some more in the future. But you cant expect a totally new experience after so many game in the series. If i had to score it based on what i have played so far i would give it a 7.5-8
its not the games fault. Its the fault of parents who allow their kids to play these kind of games and the people who are not smart enough to tell the difference between a video game or real life.
putting these gun law and blaming video games wont change a thing. All his speech was doing was just trying to find a quick and easy solution that he thinks would work.
I think what it comes down to is that this is diablo III, not diablo 2 or 1 or torchlight. is just the next game in the series. Just play it, if you dont like it, stop playing it. Dont smash it before you had a chance to play it.
to me, the only difference is that the ps3 has a darker contrast, of course it may be my compter, id rather set up a ps3 next to a 360 and judge from there.
I would say its a toss up between the PC and the 360. But the PS3's picture tends to be a little lighter. All in all, i'll stick with my 360 version. The thing with the pc version, to get that kind of graphics to work smoothly, you would need a top of the line computer.
i would ger one, but the no umd use is kind of stupid, on top of that there is no way to transfer the games you already have on umd over to the console.
vidgame17's comments