i also once heard a clever guy saying that "what ever difference makes any of the consoles(xbox 360 mostly) better, its the developer's fault and not the console's". I had a good laugh because he sounds like microsoft pays the developers more than sony to make tem look better.Its crazy isn't it? xbox 360 shows better because,its GPU is constructed by genius programmers to show everything the developers worked at. It is clearly a GPU issue on ps3. If unchared 2 was released in xbox 360 simultaneously with ps3. xbox 360 would have shockingly looked better and ps3 would have been left behind,yet again.

you may be right.But static look on ps3 exclusives alone cannot be called better.But the programming.Exclusives seem to look better because,they are only one of their kind with no competetor in graphic comparison.(But i love uncharted 2 by the way.)

let's face it.when it comes to games,ps3 looks impressive on the paper with bluray and all that.but looks washed out on textures,frame tears,colors and contrasts looks barely upto the level of a seventh gen console,psn crashed resently.but xbox 360 show better textures,frame hardly tears, has richer colors and show better contrasts besides being stored in a 9gb dvd.This is because of the gpu and the pixel shader(instead of ps3's pixel blurrer) and frame buffer of course,red ring of death is clearly modified on the slim console,most of all, XBOX LIVE makes xbox 360 superior to any existing console or any pc.it's games are better sold than ps3 exclusive.xbox live gold is charged but its worth it since 360 has more live customers than psn.So we get to make more friends. also note that blu ray dont enhance graphics.it just plays what is in the blu ray disc.So ,xbox 360 is a clear winner.But ps3 is a good console.It is just no match for xbox 360.