Insane! When the Last of Us gets universal praise (its one of the highest rated games this gen) meaning the game IS THAT GREAT, there are people who hope or want other reviewers to go against the grain just for the sake of it...just to be "different"
And the people who do do that, are the ONLY "opinions" who you should respect according to these haters!
SMH
Such backwards twisted logic. Only xbox fanboys do stuff like that
Notice how its the same "argument" being said again and again too (Its xbot shills saying this stuff. Its obvious)
That attiude is essentially trolling for a reaction etc
You want people to NOT ackowledge all the love and hard work Naughty Dog put into their game for us, JUST because you want reviewers to be "different" and give the game a low score
Not only is that insane IT is SO DISRESPECTFUL to Naughty Dog who is the best developer gaming has ever seen( they have created 2 of the highest rated games of this gen, both dramtically different IPs. What Naughty Dog has accomplished is unheard of. No ONE can question Naughty Dog's versatility and unfathomable TALENTS)
People have a right to have an OPINION that differs from Tom McShea's review of Last of Us. SO how about that;)
Somebody posted a link saying Microsoft is paying 3rd parties NOT to show their games off at Sony's E3 conference
That is beyond shady.Micosoft is PATHETIC, and their actions are that of a desperate company who KNOWS they lost
Im pretty sure that IS ILLEGAL for Microsoft to do too.Obstruction of competition /Anti Trust laws etc
Somebody please TWEET that link to Playstation! Lets see if we can get something done about this
IF Microsoft is willing to do corrupt things like that what MAKES you think they didnt pay off Gamespot and Polygon to score Last of Us WELL below the average
So when Last of Us gets universal praise, meaning the game IS THAT GREAT. you want people to go against the grain just for the sake of it...just to be "different"
And the people who do do that YOU ONLY respect their "opinions"
SMH
Thats such backwards insane twisted logic. Only xbox fanboys do stuff like that
Thats essentially trolling for a reaction etc
You want people to NOT ackowledge all the hard work Naughty Dog did to create a great game for us JUST because you want them to be different and give the game a low score
Not only is that insane IT is SO DISRESPECTFUL to Naughty Dog who is the best developer gaming has ever seen
I AGREE with the fact people have a right to have an OPINION that differs from Tom McShea's review of Last of Us. How about that;)
I like how elitest pricks high off the smell of their own farts come in here to whine about us "whining" about this review
Or how they try to tell us ITS just Tom's opinions.
These geeks put some reviewers on such a pedastool. Its pathetic.
Its like you cant questiom them, because "its just their opinion"
We HAVE the RIGHT of our opinion to NOT like his review and we have the right to CALL him out on what he does wrong
I also like how the new excuse is, dont put so much into a number score. Its a number score.
Well, THEY do assign NUMBER scores. They PUT weight into them so when Tom praises Last of Us YET gives it a lower score then what his parise indicates, ITS A PROBLEM AND WE HAVE EVEY right to call out that descripencey
I love the ignorant bastards who campaign for Tom McShea's review of Last of Us, because it suites their agenda, but yet they ignore ALL the other better more in depth reviews of Last of Us which praise the Last of Us has the best game of this gen in their opinionsAnd yeah, IGN's review of Last of Us was FAR more informative, went far more in depth and had far more legitimate pointsGamespot SUCKS for their reviews. Many have specualted Gamespot is sponsored by Microsoft
I love the ignorant bastards who campaign for Tom McShea's review of Last of Us, because it suites their agenda, but yet they ignore ALL the other better more in depth reviews of Last of Us which praise the Last of Us has the best game of this gen in their opinions
And yeah, IGN's review of Last of Us was FAR more informative, went far more in depth and had far more legitimate points
Gamespot SUCKS for their reviews. Many have specualted Gamespot is sponsored by Microsoft
Oh and dont give me any of that "you haveny played the game yet" non sense
I played the demo, and that demo of Last of Us alone was one of the most tense, atmospheric, suspensful, gratifying, immersive experiences ive had yet. The combat/ gameplay was sooooo amazing and dynamic too
Also, EVERY reviewer is saying the same things about how special Last of Us is
Tom McShea (and the Microsoft sponsored Polygon) are the ONLY ones saying differently, but yeah, according to xbot shills defending them, Tom is the ONLY one who is right in all of this LOL GTFO
I agree with one of the guys in the video who said Tom McShea's review of Last of Us was bad and just lazy
Gamespot is trying to make fun of it all. This is exactly what the John Stewart show does too. They make fun of serious issues so people take them lightly and stop caring etc
Its a common propoganda tactic Gamespot is utilizing here
It doenst work anymore
People dont care for Tom McShea and his review of Last of Us for a reason!
Gamespot's video review of Last of Us has recieved a record number of dislikes for a reason!
Opinions can still be ignorant or wrong, which some of his opinions of the Last of Us clearly are!
The thing is HE IS a reviewer so he IS SUPPOSED to be fair.
When he priases Last of Us, what he says doesnt match the score he gives it
Thats A MAJOR problem
He wasnt being fair in asigning a legit score to Last of Us
We HAVE EVERY right to call him out on that
If you want to go down the "its his opinion" route anyway
We have a right TO OUR opinions too
I HAVE an OPINION
And its my OPINION that his review of Last of Us was lazy, BAD, and seemed like nothing more then troll bait! There, no screw off you "its just his opinion" trolls
voicereason's comments