I liked the review system how it was before, specifically the emblems that came with reviews. I think it's BS that Gamespot got rid of them. If the goal of overhauling the review system was to simplify game reviews, getting rid of review emblems is exactly what Gamespot should NOT have done. It really set the reviews on this site apart from a site like IGN.

I liked the review system how it was before, specifically the emblems that came with reviews. I think it's BS that Gamespot got rid of them. If the goal of overhauling the review system was to simplify game reviews, getting rid of review emblems is exactly what Gamespot should NOT have done. It really set the reviews on this site apart from a site like IGN.

Of course not. These are games you play at work.

Who really gives a f***?

This seems useless.

I think video games are one of the best ways to tell a story. The fact that you always know what's going on (or at least should) is one of the main things in a video game, which makes it easy to tell a story. Now, did Gamespot really have to do a feature about this? This question can only be answered with opinions, so I really don't think we need a whole new feature like this.

[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]

The PC graphics ARE better, but that may only be because of the hardware it's using. Gamespot probably stays on top of that, while gamers who use the PC a lot probably use that money for games, and then hardware. In other words, any other gamer likely wouldn't see this good of graphics on the PC.

Oh, and I just hope that I don't have to buy even more instruments for what may be Rock Band Track Pack: The Beatles. :)

It's a good thing I took off with the Rock Band series. Now Activision will have a rough time to follow through with this without again being called a "copycat."