I'm really getting tired of bad licenced games. I don't see why developer's have such a tough time with them. It's not like EA has to create a great Superman or Batman game. Developers just can't get it right these days. Lately iv'e just been seeing developers struggle. When there is a good movie, or character I can't stand seeing them put in an awful game. Some are treated well Star Wars you got Kotor and The Force Unleashed looks great. Scarface got a good treatment, and Activision normally does good with there Marvel Comics titles. But there are some that just suck. Look at Robocop for example, one of the coolest sci-fi movies ever, but the titus 2003 Robocop title for Xbox might as well be called "RoboSuck". (titus also developed Superman 64 crap!!!). But one thing many developers have learned over the years is that they can make a licenced game, put it in stores and if it's good great, if it's bad it will still sell good. When there is a good licenced game fine but these day's we "gamers" are getting screwed. I personally was a fan of EA's Superman Returns title on 360 despite negative reviews . The worst thing is if their is a bad listened game, we might be stuck with it. If the only way we can be Luke Skywalker is in Lego form, we'll just have to learn to live with it.