then be the first person to put down the batThe poor horse is getting beaten pretty badly
TaMuK711
xpopsx's forum posts
art style is a very broad thing it is every tree to the way the main char looks to the odd shaped backround so im a little confused as to how you mean art style do you mean the weird effects that some games use like okami nmh madworld or do you mean the look of objects and chars
i probably say graphics either way. which would you rather look at crysis or okami?
also graphics are alot more then lightinganbloom effect its a alot of things that come togather to look real.
[QUOTE="Sepewrath"]But I will say this one more time, online play DOES NOT equal replay value, its just another mode. psychobrewWhat games with online play don't have replay value? any game with crappy multiplayer. it seems like devs feel like they have to have mp now days,and this game seems like its gonna focus alot more on sword play meaning prabably shouldnt have multiplayer
there were not 3 game cube zeldas only 2 counting twighlight princess. nintendo has been puting 2 zelda per console sence 64 ,the wii has none yet. also you are right games take awhile to delvelpe but zelda wii has been develoment atleast sence 2005 meaning four and half years thats more the most other zelda gamesheres the thing ,,
you cant demand somthing you aint buying
for instance no more heroes , deblob cod waw quantum of solace mad world , etc
lots of games aimed at gamers yet , , ,, not many are buying , , \
lets face it , nintendo did not leave you , many others left them as a result many dont remember what nintendo has done ,,
those arguing for more zelda and mario title should look back in the snes era,
how many mario games were released in the mario bros series , ,
1
how many zelda titles- 1
its been that way ever since i was shocked to see 3 zeldas on gc , you got lucky ,,
stop whining for zelda and mario because we all know zelda and mario titles take time to develope,
i want my f zero ,, , thats a definate ,, theyll do it , ,
but if you cry to nintendo , then i guess theyll do a zelda title, ,
or wait ,, i believe they already announced a zelda title lol ds,
what are the chances of them doing 2 new zelda titles at once , ?
theres other games nintendo has yet to release and they will soon ,
mariokart64fan
you do realise you are whining about other people whining?
super mario bross DS used gameplay from the mid 80ths .i think it sold around 10 millions and is considered one of the best DS games. Some genres just dont age.[QUOTE="intro94"][QUOTE="TaMuK711"]
Wii have a winner.
TaMuK711
Complete fail of an example, especiallyconsidering this has nothing to do with the DS.That isreleasing thefirst game of the most widely recognized game series in the world on ahandheld, not coming out with a new game claiming its using amazing technology.
Lets see.... Resident Evil is a great series... they must be releasing a great game based on the gameplay of the series right?
No? We're getting a lazy on-rails clickable cutscene?
One look at Resident Evil 4 compared to Umbrella Chronicles is all it takes to figure out what game is superior in the series.
on-rails is a genre like rts ,mmo , rpg, or fpsthis is not a lazy effort on rails does not make the game any easyier to produce thinking so is ignorant.
"
Lets see.... Resident Evil is a great series... they must be releasing a great game based on the gameplay of the series right?"
you want the same game play then play the same game. if i wanted mario 3 gameplay i would play mario 3.
"No? We're getting a lazy on-rails clickable cutscene?"
with that thinking , whats a rts a glorified game of chess?
[QUOTE="wiifan001"]Seriously, with Sega developed titles, just slap Sonic the Hedgehog on it and it WILL sell. That's how awesome Sega's marketing has become. It selling very strong again, like its time back in the Sega consoles. The difference was, most of the titles on Sega consoles were extraordinary, unlike today's titles. However, that doesn't mean I want Sega to leave Nintendo, because that would be worst thing that could happen. I definitely support both Sega developed/published titles.intro94its not marketting , its brand recognition.You can make anything with Mario and it will sell, no marketting required. Sonic is among most tradtional mascots with a fanbase growing since the 90ths, so its easy to sell.On the original post, is not like sega can pop and people will love it. It wouldnt explain why Sonic magic rings sold better and is better categorized than black knight. they do need quality to get things running, they can make a bad game here and then but they wont survive on that. Im not sure of they are the best developer, maybe best 3rd party publisher, but the certainly come up there as top developer teams for wii. what you say about mario and sonic is true but nintendo hasnt done that yet mario 64,sunshine and smg have all been AAA quilty titles(this does not count mario party etc because those games are not made by nintendo he just appears in them)
[QUOTE="Resimaniac"]
Pikmin 3 is in Development and Pikmin 1 & 2 remakes are already out
P.S: Who said PC has better controls than the Wii? In my opinion Wii's are way better :PResimaniac
It's not that they are better, it's that there's more buttons, and settings. Also, for PC games, there are downloadable mods that make the game more customizable.
It's about everyone's personal opinion... I know PC has great controls for Strategy (I was and I am sick of Age Of Mythology) But New Play Control! Pikmin make me like Wii's (RTS controls) more... Any way who care's about me It's just my opinion :Pnot to beat a dead horse but....you cant beat a mouse with hundreds of macros and a lasermouse with3000 dpi but that's just talking in terms of having the best controls....like you said its just a opinion all that matters is that you have fun with it[QUOTE="Legendaryscmt"]
No, you're mistaken. PS3 and 360 get the superior versions while the Wii gets the POS version.
ronjon_09
My point being that the PS3 and 360 version could be that much better but they have to keep it down or should I say most developers get lazy and just slap a HD coat of paint on the PS3 360 versions.
If we had no Wii developers could soley deal with the power of PS3 and 360 and they could really push the systems and expand there minds more.
if a game sux dont blame the wii blame the "lazy devs"also you logic is flawed because most of the time multiplatform games are made by different devs (meaning main devs might make 360 and ps3 version and they will pass the wii version off to someone else)
That looks really fun. I'm still not much of a fan of the art direction and graphics of the game. I'd rather see something more cartoony or cel-shaded, but if the game (both golf and disc golf) play well I'll likely pick it up.Skie7the wii allready has the idea of cartoony/kiddie we dont need anymore of that ,although imo some cel shaded is pretty cool
[QUOTE="Pyro767"][QUOTE="wiifan001"]Why the heck are there votes for Zelda?? Let me help you: See, this was announed to the world one month ago. Enjoy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuW2LY6u8uQFoxi911We know about Spirit Tracks, we are waiting for a game on the Wii.OMG but there not fliping going to talk about two zelda games....AT ONE CONFERENCE a#SSAKJA...the only zelda people will be hearing about is the one for DS....Im getting annoyed....with this..maybe next yr.sense zelda wii has been in the works for 4 years it should come pretty soon people are just expecting that e3 is good time to announce with style
Log in to comment