xsa's forum posts

Avatar image for xsa
xsa

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 xsa
Member since 2004 • 199 Posts

You play the story mode.

Avatar image for xsa
xsa

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 xsa
Member since 2004 • 199 Posts

Chronicles of Riddick for xbox 1 was good.

So were 2 bond games for the xbox 1, Nothingsomethingmaybe? and the Russian one. Bad memory. :(

Avatar image for xsa
xsa

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 xsa
Member since 2004 • 199 Posts

Ditto. I miss the real zombies swarming you.Canvas_Of_Flesh

What are real zombies?

Avatar image for xsa
xsa

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 xsa
Member since 2004 • 199 Posts

MGS are already resembling movies, so that would be pointless. GTA would only be made into a generic boring action-movie with best of luck.

Those that could succeed at being movies would be Dead Space(if they do not make the same mistakes doom did), BioShock. Games I would like to see as movies but probably would never happen since it requires a heavy purse to make it any good would be Lost Oddyssey, Mass Effect and Gears of War due to the environments, characters and vehicles in use, low budget sci-fi/fantasy is unbearable.

Avatar image for xsa
xsa

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 xsa
Member since 2004 • 199 Posts

It was okish, much better then I expected. All classes were fairly balanced. Was worried the scout insta-kill ability would be too overpowering but it pretty much requires the enemies to not know you're there in the first place to be any effective plus some people to hold aggro.

Expected this to just be a **** Dynasty Warrior clone, but it wasn't, so far I'm impressed with it. Just hoping to get to play a battle that's intense and most people of roughly same skill level to see how it is when not just owning clueless people or getting ran over because the rest of your team havn't figured out how to move yet.

Avatar image for xsa
xsa

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 xsa
Member since 2004 • 199 Posts
Dragon Age or White Knight Story(only for PS3 unfortunatley, so FF13 for 360'ers), wether you prefer western or JRPG-style. No contest whatsoever.
Avatar image for xsa
xsa

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 xsa
Member since 2004 • 199 Posts

To me they have almost as good song libraries, not counting DLC etc, but in every other way RB2 is superior, especially the multiplayer where it's a lot easier, smoother and makes more sense to play in RB2 as the WT games quickplay is completely messed up in that it makes it a hassle to change between bass and guitar between songs aswell as difficulty between songs.

Also the fret-boards in the game are messed up in WT as they are cut off compared to singelplayer, meaning that if you, like me, like to play on hyperspeed 4 in singelplayer, playing with that in multiplayer would be like having hyperspeed 8 or so on in singelplayer, making it completely unplayable. Thus you have to switch back and forth when switching between multi and singelplayer.

On the other hand, RB2's fretboards are totally messed up in the way you can't control hyperspeed per instrument aswell as everyones fretboard gets slowed down to snail-speed if just one player plays it on easy, which doesn't make any sense, because if you play a really intense song on expert with guitar and another guy plays on easy(this is just locally though) you more or less won't be able to play because the notes are so tight together it's ridicilous.

Out of the two I do however prefer RB2's method of handling it.

The duelling in both games are useless and boring, co-op is where it's all at, so there's no real point in comparing them but if you'd have to WT has more modes but RB2 has the Band Challenge where you play set-lists as a band and try to beat everyone elses scores or streaks, new Band Challenges come along now ad then.

Graphic wise, the Guitar Hero game looks exactly like it did on the PS2, which is awful and it's ridicilous how they always speak as if they're proud of their art-style when it looks like it would run smoothly on a PS2, especially if you compare it to way more beautiful PS2 games like God of War. Not saying Rock Bands graphics are the bomb, but they don't clutter and you can more easily focus on playing the game.

However, the thing that kills the WT game a lot for me is the way they handle Star Power in co-op. It's goddamn awful and shameful. First of all, everyone shares SP, fine, that works. But not when it's bloody impossible to at anytime when playing the game see how much SP you have, which is bad for the drummer as activating starpower when there's not enough starpower causes him to miss a note, would've been better to put a big number in the middle of the screen that tells you how many activations you as a band have.

There's also DLC of course. The DLC for RB2 is superior so far, only pure awesomeness that WT has is the Hendrix pack and Metallica pack, if you like those of course, but RB has stuff like the Who album, Judas Priest, Boston, lots of obscure punk and unknown bands and even things like Yngwie Malmsteen. Plus you can play all RB1 songs in RB2, except 3 which are Enter Sandman, Run to the Hills and can't remember last.

On a last note, the guitar for guitar hero is 100000000x better to me. Really despise the RB one, but I guess that's 'cause I'm used to the GH one. Can't say much about drums and mic, I don't sing and I only have the WT drums, which I like and can play both RB and WT without trouble with.

Avatar image for xsa
xsa

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 xsa
Member since 2004 • 199 Posts
GoW2 was a good game, not a great game. GoW however got all the awards it deserved, GoW2 was just more of the same goodness, just nothing new and I agree with the decision not to even nominate it, all games that were nominated brought more new stuff to their respective franchises then GoW2 did, period.
Avatar image for xsa
xsa

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 xsa
Member since 2004 • 199 Posts
Iron Maiden non-useless covers. Find it sad so few Maiden songs have made it into the franchise considering they'd be a perfect band to get in there, though pretty much every song would be ranked as extremely hard on vocals so you'd have to be insane at singing.
Avatar image for xsa
xsa

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 xsa
Member since 2004 • 199 Posts

To me MGS4 was the obvious GOTY game this year whilst next years obvious GOTY game will be Dragon Age:Origins, only possible toppled by FFXIII or White Knight Story, but seeing as how BioWare are the true masters of roleplaying games they shouldn't be able to lose that fight.

Fable 2 was a good game, but not much more then a 1-time playthrough game as there wasn't really that much variation to the side-quests and the story was, frankly, quite weak, always felt like they still were trapped a bit too much in Fable 1 territory where combat was in focus a bit much.

Other obvious contestants for GOTY, for many at least, would've been GTAIV which was a good game, but unfortunatley not great to me. Like many games today with multiplayer, GTAIV fell into the same trap. Instead of making a perfect singelplayer experience they focus on less in that area to spit out a less than mediocre mplayer part. See The Darkness for another obvious example of this.

One game I was hoping for to be GOTY material was Prince of Persia, story-wise and character-wise it would've had a chance, but it was just so ridicilously easy, especially for PoP veteran like me where the first 5 minutes of The Two Thrones is harder then the whole game combined.

Other games that could've been up there, obviously, are GoW2 and Dead Space, GoW2's multiplayer ruined a lot for me unfortunatley, not for everyone I'm sure but for me it did, and Dead Space just didn't really scare me. Got more scared of BioShock to be honest, but both of those were still good singelplayer experience with good stories.

To, aswell as them obviously, Fable 2 does actually hold something over all those other games and actually managed to deliver a co-op that didn't feel awkward, sure it was a bit pointless but could be decent fun, and out of place. Can't really hold its own against MGS4, but the rest of the games it can definatley hold its own to.