Review

Consortium Review

  • First Released Jan 8, 2014
    released
  • PC

Mistakes on a plane.

One thing's for sure: Consortium isn't afraid to hide one of its chief influences. Mere minutes in, responding to a quip from the pilot of a futuristic craft crammed with quasi-military types, I jumped on the best of three possible responses: "So you're the ship's joker, right?" Had it used a capital "J," developer Interdimensional Games might as well have shouted out its inspiration. Indeed, Consortium is partly Mass Effect stripped of all that business of exploring worlds and drilling planets, opting instead to unfold events in an aircraft from 2042 that feels like the Normandy and looks strikingly similar to a Boeing 747. L. Ron Hubbard would be proud. But this isn't some soulless rip-off; look past crippling bugs and visual oddities, such as water faucets that seem to spit mercury and the Tomb Raider-circa-2003 faces, and you'll find a role-playing game experience that's at least worthy of breathing the same air as BioWare's space saga.

Consortium presents us with a distinctly European vision of the future, down to quips about how Americans no longer make the best stuff in 2042. It's populated with a motley selection of nationalities and races that work for a peacekeeping organization that may or may not have sinister intentions, and the entire concept hinges on a military hierarchy that labels people with the names of various chess pieces. You, for instance, take on the role of Bishop Six, a warrior enforcer of sorts on his first day on the job, and your presence leads you to butt heads with the knight in charge or tease unfortunately named pawns about relieving themselves in the brig toilet. As the plot reveals, it's a fun job, and you end up investigating murders, sniffing out traitors, attempting to tame mercenaries with diplomatic skills, and sometimes even fighting.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Now Playing: Consortium Video Review

Consortium might look dated, but it's the story that counts.
Consortium might look dated, but it's the story that counts.

Taking on roles isn't a figure of speech in this case. One of Consortium's most fascinating quirks is that its meta-narrative assigns you the role of a contemporary player in a satellite-based game that lets you slip into the minds of figures from alternate futures. (Top that one, Oculus Rift.) It initially seems like little more than a tired Assassin's Creed-inspired conceit, but only minutes in, Consortium lets you blurt out the truth to your underlings if you wish. Part of what makes Consortium so appealing is that such playful sallies affect the game's more serious preoccupations with murders, subterfuge, and even cocky Bulgarian recidivists who attack you with antique fighter jets in order to stay off the sensors. Push it too far, and the talking chess pieces around you might start to doubt your ability to lead them to checkmate.

It's generally fun to hear them talk. While some of Bishop Six's responses exhibit an unfortunate smidge of juvenile phrasing, the surrounding crew members exude a degree of humanity barely suggested by their antiquated models. Pause too long before answering as I did while taking notes, and they cut off the conversation out of a belief that you're either rude or just don't want to answer. Conversations flow well from one to another regardless of shifts in subject matter, and Consortium tops it all off with a generally competent voice cast. This works well when you hear Knight 15's confidence waver in the face of little human errors, which makes her leadership seem more believable, or even when crewmembers of various ranks argue over whether to announce the discovery of a murdered rook's corpse.

Push it too far, and the talking chess pieces around you might start to doubt your ability to lead them to checkmate.

There's gotta be a paper on free will in all this.
There's gotta be a paper on free will in all this.

It's fitting, then, that the ship itself is as much of a character as the crewmembers who populate it. Not unlike Cowboy Bebop, Consortium walks a fine line between the familiar and the far-fetched, and that mixture adds a touch of creepiness as you hunt the rooms for clues and hobnob with crewmembers who balk when you question things that someone in your position should know. You spend almost all your time on the ship, and it's thus a good thing that its three decks offer plenty of exploration to make up for the absence of any ground exploration on your way from Bulgaria to London. Partly thanks to the inclusion of a sweeping musical score by composer Jeremy Soule of Elder Scrolls and Guild Wars fame, the mere act of exploring its air ducts and closed rooms is a pleasure in itself.

Consortium also serves as a decent if uninspired first-person shooter, even to the point of including a prompt at the beginning that adjusts the difficulty for story or action. It's a familiar enough concept, but Consortium goes further than most games by letting you avoid almost all of the gunplay by focusing on careful answers and juggling the dispositions of various enemies and friends. It's a more rewarding approach to Consortium, much like playing Dishonored with an exclusive focus on stealth. Yet shooting is so secondary to the general drive of Consortium that much of it occurs in training exercises in a holodeck of sorts, or through a brief virtual dogfighting sequence. There are no specializations or skills to tinker with--only a smattering of weapons and the ability to incapacitate downed soldiers or to heal allies around you.

Almost all of Consortium takes place on the ship, but your actions could impact the world around it.
Almost all of Consortium takes place on the ship, but your actions could impact the world around it.

And man, is Consortium glitchy. I spent my first few days with the game occasionally unable to get far beyond the loading screen without the computer locking up; I later learned to wait it out for about five minutes. And there's an otherwise impressive sequence late in the game that can cause all manner of problems. I struggled with it myself until the devs posted a workaround on the Steam forums last Tuesday that allowed me a peek at what passes for the end. The issues are so severe that Interdimensional now has a disclaimer on its Steam page acknowledging and apologizing for the troubles, along with the hopeful news that the problems should clear up with a bulky patch toward the end of the month.

It's a shame, because Consortium delivers a uniquely enjoyable RPG experience despite its rather disappointing running time of around four to five hours. That's not as bad as it initially sounds, however, since you discover remarkable differences in gameplay depending on how you make your decisions throughout the game (and on whether you decide to shoot up the place), thus lending Consortium a dose of replay value. For now, at least, it's best to wait. Consortium has a fascinating story to tell that leads you down some bizarre narrative pathways that break the fourth wall, and it's likely best experienced when you can get it to play without crashing or bugging out. Considering that it's partly a game about time travel, a couple of weeks isn't that long to hold out.

Back To Top

The Good

  • Exploring the sci-fi jumbo jet is fun
  • Choices let you avoid combat, or shoot your way out
  • Fascinating handling of fourth-wall story elements
  • Good voice work and musical score

The Bad

  • Buggy--really, really buggy
  • Weak shooting elements
  • Ends just as it's picking up steam

About the Author

Leif Johnson loves good characterization in an RPG, and Consortium presents one of the most authentic ensemble casts in a while. For the purposes of this review, he played several times to experiment with different choices.
10 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for McGuirex3
McGuirex3

581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By McGuirex3

So you couldn't have waited for that said (patch) before you gave the game a bloody 6? The way you sounded like it should have gotten a 71/2 or maybe even an 8, but no all because of a little bug or two. Come on it's a very small ((indie))-game dev.)!!!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Tabain
Tabain

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@McGuirex3 You and the people like you are the reason we now have most games being released broken and unfinished. If you charge money for something and release it to the public, expect people to have opinions on it and not just sit around praying that it may get fixed months from now.

2 • 
Avatar image for McGuirex3
McGuirex3

581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@Tabain @McGuirex3


You didn't even read my post nor do you make mush sense, please go away!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for megakick
megakick

1931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

So many games that could have been made 10 years ago? This the future of gaming?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for McGuirex3
McGuirex3

581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@megakick


You would think so right. What w/ all the mind craft (looking), aka in our face block looking graf-games that look like they should have come out like back in the late 80's and or 90! What's up w/ that anyway.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Stormtamer
Stormtamer

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@megakick Many books written today could have been written years, decades, maybe even centuries ago. That doesn't diminish their quality.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Jaxith
Jaxith

708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

I noticed this game a while ago. It looked cool, but I was worried about quality, so glad I got to see a review on it. Apart from crippling bugs, it seems like a game I'd really enjoy.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dark_sith_
dark_sith_

53

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By dark_sith_

Sadly I couldn't get far because bugs were making the game unplayable. It's hard to believe that this is Source engine game. As I understand, they've added dynamic lighting and that is the chief cause of most problems. I'd love to have the option to disable that particular feature and play glitch free. While I like eye candy in my game I can forego that for good gameplay and well written story.


Funny you should mention Mass Effect as the main influence because from the first screenshot to playing the game myself (what little of it I did) I was thinking "System Shock 2". Something about the plane simply evoked the atmosphere of that game.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for esotericus
Esotericus

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By Esotericus

@dark_sith_ Yeah, there's a lot of System Shock 2 in there, true! I was kind of wishing I'd put more about that in after I turned in the review, but there you have it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for fend_oblivion
fend_oblivion

6760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By fend_oblivion

@dark_sith_ Yup, the color palette reminds me strongly of System Shock 2.

Upvote •