Review

Killers Of The Flower Moon Review - Not Long Enough

  • First Released Oct 20, 2023
    released
  • movie
Phil Owen on Google+

Martin Scorsese's latest is quite lengthy, but that's a good thing.

Killers of the Flower Moon comes with a pair of bookends that play, to me, like director Martin Scorsese accepting defeat. It opens with an old-timey newsreel effusively telling us about the fortunes of the Osage people, how an oil deposit on Osage land has given these Native Americans immense wealth and rich lifestyles. More than three hours later, it caps this story with a true crime radio drama epilogue, complete with sound effects and cartoon-ish voice performances a la A Prairie Home Companion.

In between those scenes, Killers of the Flower Moon is a meticulously paced character study about a white family's attempts to destroy the Osage while pretending to be their friends--this is a true story. But those bookends feel like an acknowledgement of the limitations of the format--try as they might, Scorsese and co. cannot truly do justice to this story with something so frivolous as a movie. Even one that's three-and-a-half hours long.

Warning: This review contains light spoilers for Killers of a Flower Moon related to the development of characters based on the true story behind the film.

That said, Killers of the Flower Moon is quite an experience even so. It centers on Leonardo DiCaprio's Ernest Burkhart, who pops up in Oklahoma to try to get work with his uncle William (Robert De Niro) and brother (Scott Shepherd), who are enmeshed in the Osage community. Ernest begins his time there working as a cabbie, and before long he's made the acquaintance of an Osage woman named Molly Kyle (Lily Gladstone).

No Caption Provided

Uncle William encourages Ernest to get close to Molly--if he marries her, Ernest could inherit Osage headrights, which gave members of the Osage Nation a share of their oil money. But he can't inherit anything while Molly's family is alive. And so, one by one, Molly's sisters and other Osage folks are killed, the sheriff doesn't care in the least, and it's William who's behind it all.

The way that Killers of the Flower Moon treats Ernest in particular is fascinating, portraying him almost as an innocent and oblivious man being manipulated by his terrible uncle. But the film gradually unwraps him, piece by piece, at first merely hinting that he may know more about these dark plans, then slowly, over hours, revealing the painful depth of his complicity. But even through it all, Ernest clings to his belief in his own goodness--he's never able to fully come to grips with the reality of his life with William, who makes Ernest call him King.

A large part of Ernest's cognitive dissonance is inspired by what the film portrays as a seemingly genuine love for Molly. Molly is a wary woman, but she falls for Ernest because he comes off as very open and sincere--he admits that he would enjoy making use of Molly's money, rather than trying to pretend otherwise the way other men might have, and Molly appreciates the candor.

No Caption Provided

Molly is also in a tough spot, since all full-blooded Osage required a white guardian to access their money--something we see Molly have to do several times during Killers of the Flower Moon. Marrying Ernest ostensibly gets her around that problem, assuming he's not an awful person, and so it's not hard to appreciate the urge.

Gladstone's almost stoic performance is in stark contrast to the rather emotive DiCaprio and the always-talking De Niro--she gets a lot of play out of small expressions, like a tiny smirk, side-eye, and things like that. She's got the vibe of a character who's always contemplating the situation and realizing she doesn't have many options. And while she's rarely loud, she always carries herself with a serious presence.

For me personally, though, as somebody with a lot of real-life, personal experience with William's brand of two-faced Christianity, it's De Niro who made the biggest impression. De Niro perfectly adopts the manner of a comforting old man uttering evangelical truisms every time an Osage person is killed--even while his character was the one responsible for all the grief to begin with. It's horrible, but also a very real and poignant dichotomy to me, and Killers of the Flower Moon dances a fine line that few filmmakers other than Scorsese could have pulled off. See also: Silence, a religious drama that I think is Scorsese' masterpiece.

Key to everything I like about Killers of the Flower Moon is its length. This thing is three hours and 26 minutes long, which is a very long time to sit in a theater, but that length is necessary. If anything, it's not enough. Killers of the Flower Moon is an immersive experience that shows what you need to see instead of telling you what you need to know. It's a day-in-the-life kind of story, putting you in these characters' shoes as best it can--there's actual depth to this telling, and the result is that by the end we feel Molly's truth rather than simply knowing it.

Because of that, I'd have been okay with it going even longer. Killers of the Flower Moon is super long, yes, but that length, along with Scorsese's filmmaking approach, allows us to really live with these characters and understand them in a meaningful way--but with more time, maybe we could have known them even better.

Phil Owen on Google+
Back To Top

The Good

  • The three-hour-and-26-minutes running time flies right by
  • Lily Gladstone, Leonardo DiCaprio, and especially Robert De Niro all deserve their impending Oscar nominations

The Bad

  • It's too short, if anything
  • It may come close, but no film could 100% do this story justice

About the Author

Phil Owen is a freelance writer. A screening of Killers of the Flower Moon was provided by Paramount and Apple.
29 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for Sushiglutton
Sushiglutton

10530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Scorsese made this one shorter so DiCaprio could watch it without his date getting too old for him 😉.

(thanks Ricky)

3 • 
Avatar image for itsnota2mer
ItsNotA2Mer

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By ItsNotA2Mer

@Sushiglutton: 🔥 🔥 🔥😅

Upvote • 
Avatar image for drod0756
drod0756

260

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

drod0756  Online

Any longer and it becomes a documentary or a HBO series. Maybe Scorsese and DeNiro should make some of those. Going to be fun watching Oppenheimer and KotFM battle it out for Oscars. One of the few years I can remember where two movies I really enjoyed (hopefully) are favorites.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bakula
Bakula

473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Bakula  Online

Book’s pretty cool, my hope is that Marty presents multiple sides vs. “white = bad” It’s way worse than that imo because fellow Indians are also stealing and cheating their own for oil money, since, you know, it corrupts absolutely.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for xboxplayer1
xboxplayer1

176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

I love movies and I like Scorsese, but I really can't watch this movie. It's upsetting to see this as a person who is 3 quarters Native Americans. I don't want to see any movie where White people are murdering them for land or oil. I think movies like these shouldn't be made but rather taught about in college or so on.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for 7rooper
7rooper

144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@xboxplayer1: Movies are art and as such an artist has the right to represent anything.

2 • 
Avatar image for bakula
Bakula

473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Bakula  Online

@xboxplayer1: Ugh go read it. News flash: Native Americans aren’t/weren’t all good.

3 • 
Avatar image for illegal_peanut
illegal_peanut

4216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Watch as Leo doesn't get an Oscar for this movie.

Even though he plays his ass off in every film he's in (Even more than the people he loses to).

2 • 
Avatar image for 5tu88sy
5tu88sy

499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Instant 9 or 10 coz Leo's on set.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for restatbonfire
RestatBonfire

2579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Been waiting for this movie all year. I'm excited. Scorsese is still my favorite director with some of my all time favorite movies. Raging Bull is a masterpiece

3 • 
Avatar image for j3diknightdave
j3DiKNiGHtDAVE

1061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

A 9?!

I don't know, this coming from the same guy that gave "Ahsoka" a 2. LOL! Maybe Phil has his GS rating system mixed up, and low is good & high is bad.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for stickemup
StickEmUp

2259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By StickEmUp

@j3diknightdave: You must not be familiar with Scorsese’s work. He is the best living director, and one of the best directors of all time. He almost never makes a movie that’s anything less than a 9. This movie is getting rave reviews left and right. It’s not just GameSpot.

How are you even comparing a Star Wars show from a non-world-renowned director to this? If I eat a burger that people like and say it sucked, and then try some spaghetti and say it was amazing, it would be ridiculous for someone to be like, “This coming from the guy who said that burger sucked.” What do the two things have to do with each other?

3 • 
Avatar image for kirkalbuquerque
KirkAlbuquerque

356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

@j3diknightdave: lol "J3diknight" mad is cartoon bullshit was rightfully trashed

2 • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

19992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

mogan  Moderator

@kirkalbuquerque: Ahsoka was live action, and pretty good after the first two episodes.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for itsnota2mer
ItsNotA2Mer

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By ItsNotA2Mer

@j3diknightdave: "A 9?!"

You seem surprised? Scorsese drops trou to take a s**t, and an awesome movie falls out.

He might be an elitist blowhard, but making great movies is just what he does. 🤷

4 • 
Avatar image for muddrox
Muddrox

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

@j3diknightdave: I hope you're kidding comparing Martin Scorsese, one of the most renowned filmmakers alive, and his work to fan-pandering trash made by the monopoly-overlord itself, Disney. Because if you're not trolling, then this is me waving to you from whatever parallel universe you hail from.

7 • 
Avatar image for j3diknightdave
j3DiKNiGHtDAVE

1061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By j3DiKNiGHtDAVE

@muddrox said: @j3diknightdave: I hope you're kidding comparing Martin Scorsese, one of the most renowned filmmakers alive, and his work to fan-pandering trash made by the monopoly-overlord itself, Disney. Because if you're not trolling, then this is me waving to you from whatever parallel universe you hail from.

I'm sorry, where did I compare the movie to the show?

My OP was about 2 reviews given by the same reviewer, had nothing to do with which one is better or worst. It has to do with trusting a review done by someone that gave a 2 to something that IMO clearly wasn't a 2. It was based on personal preference.

Just like this movie was reviewed, if one enjoyed it (like the reviewer did) doesn't mean someone else would... It's not a matter of 'comparing' the two, its an 'opinion' of both.

So, continue waving from that delusional universe your from... don't worry, your not alone, there was a number of other users that don't know how to read, floating around in here.

*COUGH* @kirkalbuquerque @stickemup @Baconstrip78 *COUGH*

2 • 
Avatar image for ant999
ant999

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@j3diknightdave: Nice try. You literally said: "A 9?!" Your surprise (!) and doubt (?) in the score insinuates that you think its not rated properly.

Your follow up: "Maybe Phil has his GS rating system mixed up, and low is good & high is bad." makes it clear that you do think it was rated improperly and should actually be the opposite. "Asoka" (which he rated low) is good and "Killers of the Flower Moon (which he rated high) is bad.

You are trying to save face because everyone called you out on your bad take. Maybe you didn't mean to make it seem like you think this movie is bad, but there is no other way of reading that comment. You either have an awful take or your communication skills are terrible.. maybe both.

Take the L. (or don't.. its fun seeing how delusional you can get trying to defend yourself)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for muddrox
Muddrox

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

@j3diknightdave: I mean, if our universe is the delusional one then how bad could it be over there?

3 • 
Avatar image for Baconstrip78
Baconstrip78

1893

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@j3diknightdave: One is a Disney+ Star Wars show and another is a Martin Scorsese movie starring Leo….

If I knew they got a 2 and a 9, I would not assume the latter is getting the 2.

7 • 
Avatar image for muddrox
Muddrox

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

Edited By Muddrox

@Baconstrip78: lol I just think it's funny that he came @ you and a few other people. Like, what did you do to make *his* list? XD

4 • 
Avatar image for Bahamut50
Bahamut50

721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

@j3diknightdave: I agree that the Ahsoka take was bad but have you watched this film?

I'm just saying man, if we want to judge shit we gotta be thorough xD

3 • 
Avatar image for j3diknightdave
j3DiKNiGHtDAVE

1061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Bahamut50 said:

@j3diknightdave: I agree that the Ahsoka take was bad but have you watched this film?

I'm just saying man, if we want to judge shit we gotta be thorough xD

not judging the movie, or the show. judging the creditability of the reviewer.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bahamut50
Bahamut50

721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

@j3diknightdave: Yeah but you're still attacking the movie in the process lol.

4 • 
Avatar image for j3diknightdave
j3DiKNiGHtDAVE

1061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By j3DiKNiGHtDAVE
@Bahamut50 said:

@j3diknightdave: Yeah but you're still attacking the movie in the process lol.

Ok, let's dumb it down for the people that don't understand, Here's my OP with the corrections added in bold, tell me if it helps. if not, give your suggestions on how it should have been said...

A 9?! "(NOT SAYING THIS MOVIE SHOULDN'T BE A 9)"

I don't know, this coming from the same guy that gave "Ahsoka" a 2. LOL!Maybe Phil has his GS rating system mixed up, and low is good & high is bad. ROTF

"(AGAIN, NOT SAYING THIS MOVIE SHOULDN'T BE A 9, BUT AHSOKA DEFINITELY DESERVED BETTER THAN A 2)"

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ant999
ant999

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By ant999

@j3diknightdave:

"Phil has his GS rating system mixed up, and low is good & high is bad."
This still doesn't make sense, because in the stupid hypothetical you've created, he rated Ahsoka highly and Killers of the Flower Moon poorly, which would only make sense to you if you think Killers of the Flower Moon deserves a bad rating.
If you don't think Killers of the Flower Moon deserves a bad rating then if as you say "Phil has his GS rating system mixed up" then you would still think he has his GS rating system mixed up because he gave KotFM a bad rating.

You are dumb.

2 • 
Avatar image for j3diknightdave
j3DiKNiGHtDAVE

1061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ant999 said:

@j3diknightdave:

"Phil has his GS rating system mixed up, and low is good & high is bad."

This still doesn't make sense, because in the stupid hypothetical you've created, he rated Ahsoka highly and Killers of the Flower Moon poorly, which would only make sense to you if you think Killers of the Flower Moon deserves a bad rating.

If you don't think Killers of the Flower Moon deserves a bad rating then if as you say "Phil has his GS rating system mixed up" then you would still think he has his GS rating system mixed up because he gave KotFM a bad rating.

You are dumb.

LOL!!!!!! Your still on this?!?! Get a life brother.

Upvote •