Review

Mario Party Superstars Review - The Fault In Our Stars

  • First Released Oct 29, 2021
    released
  • NS

Hey now, here's a Toad star.

My kids had a litany of questions during our first game of Mario Party Superstars. Where, my 12-year-old son asked, was Monty Mole, his favorite character from the last game? Why are there no minigames where you have to waggle the controllers around, my seven-year-old daughter asked? Why are there so few characters to choose from anyway? And why does everyone have the same dice block?

My kids have had a lot of experience with Super Mario Party (the previous game in the series, which was released on the Nintendo Switch in 2018), so these comparisons were inevitable. The newest entry, Mario Party Superstars, is a deliberate embrace of the Mario Party series' early days before motion control gimmicks and twists on its classic game mode became the norm. This is a game that delivers on the core Mario Party experience and is high on nostalgia, but my kids' questions highlighted the trade-off that comes with that approach. In embracing the old, Superstar loses a lot of tweaks and additions that have livened up recent Mario Party games, making Superstars as much of a step back as it is a throwback.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Now Playing: Mario Party Superstars Video Review

That step back doesn't necessarily mean Mario Party Superstars is a bad game, but it does feel like a dated one. If you've ever played a Mario Party game before, then Superstars will feel instantly familiar thanks to its stripped-back focus on the series' staples: dynamic, shifting boards, a huge selection of fun minigames, and more than a hint of tear-your-hair-out randomness that gives (almost) every game an anything-can-happen feel. Depending on your age, that familiarity may also extend to Superstars' selection of boards and minigames, many of which were taken from the very start of the Mario Party franchise back in the Nintendo 64 and GameCube days.

No Caption Provided

I'm certainly old enough to remember the very first Mario Party back in the late '90s, so it was fun to get that hit of nostalgia dopamine when playing on classic boards like Peach's Birthday Cake and Yoshi's Tropical Island. Nostalgia can only take you so far, though, so it's good that Superstar's boards--all taken from the first three Mario Party games--still feel fresh and engaging to play. Each of the boards here feature their own unique twists and turns that force you to think on the fly as conditions change. Yes, it's still hard to shake the rage that comes when seemingly random in-game events conspire to thwart carefully laid plans, but Mario Party Superstars (like most Mario Party games) shines in those occasional moments when your multi-turn strategy actually does bear fruit.

You have to, for example, pay close attention to the day/night cycle in Horror Land to make sure the path you need will be open by the time you reach it. Is one of your opponents one move away from Toadette (and therefore an all-precious Star) on Yoshi's Tropical Island? Then now's the time to use that custom dice block to land exactly on the event space that switches Toadette and Bowser's locations. During one tense game, I used a triple dice block to make sure I could hit Toadette's space to grab a star, before continuing on to a Boo space, where I paid the annoying ghost to steal a star from an opponent. Two stars in one turn! My son was angry at me for hours.

Superstar's minigames are similarly cribbed from Mario Party games of old, and if you're feeling full retro, there are even options at the start of each game to only play minigames selected from the N64 or GameCube eras. There are 100 games here, and among them is a great selection of classics, including the always hectic Bumper Balls, Booksquirm, Hexagon Heat, and one of my personal favorites, the Bowser-contorting Face Lift. Superstars even brings back some controversial minigames that require rotating your controller's analog stick (like Tug-O-War) which caused many a blister and even lawsuits back with the original Mario Party (but now are accompanied by a special warning). As is typically the case with such an expansive list, not every one of these selections is a winner. I'm not a fan of minigames like Crazy Cutters and Trace Race that require precise movements such as tracing over a line, for example, but they're ones my son gravitates to because he's young and has much better eyesight and motor skills than I do.

No Caption Provided

All of the minigames in Superstars are controlled solely by using controller buttons and a joystick, which means none of the Joy-Con's motion capabilities are utilized. This approach has its obvious benefits: Unlike Super Mario Party (which could only be played using single Joy-Cons), any Switch controller can be used in Superstar, and the game can also be played completely in handheld mode. The move away from Joy-Con reliance also importantly means Mario Party Superstars is the first new Mario Party game released for the Switch that can be played on all flavors of the handheld (including the Switch Lite).

Making the game available to all types of Switch owners is a positive, but removing motion control games does paradoxically limit the types of players that can enjoy Mario Party Superstars. Take my daughter, as an example: Motion control minigames were her favorite, as the intuitive controls allowed her to keep pace with her brother and grown-ups during a game session. She was much more disinclined to play Superstars because of this, and I can imagine many other little ones (and many casual players) will feel the same way.

No Caption Provided

The lack of motion controls just adds to the been there, played that feeling that permeates the Mario Party Superstars experience. This game, for better or worse, is the Mario Party of old, which is fine for Gen Xers like me looking to scratch a nostalgia itch. But others more used to how Mario Party has evolved in recent iterations (even in its own gradual ways) will be a little disappointed. I miss, for example, some of Super Mario Party's additions, such as unique dice blocks that actually added a layer of strategy to the character you chose, as well as the Sound Stage mode that was frenetic fun to play with the kids. There's nothing wrong with classic Mario Party, but I've played that game before.

That's not to say that despite the heavy emphasis on the past that Mario Party Superstars doesn't have any concessions to the new. There are several welcome quality-of-life additions (such as being able to exit a game midway through and resume it later, online player integration in all modes, and the ability to add extra turns at the end of a particularly close game), as well as an excellent minigames-only mode that groups the 100 games into buckets such as sports, action, team-based, and more. Mario Party Superstars certainly provides the highs that the series is capable of, but unless you're restricted to playing on the Switch Lite or itching to play with a Pro Controller, there's a better version of this game available for you and your loved ones to play in Super Mario Party.

Back To Top

The Good

  • Great selection of boards and minigames from classic Mario Party games
  • Equal parts fun and frustrating
  • Some welcome quality-of-life additions
  • Can be played on any Switch

The Bad

  • A stripped-down Mario Party experience
  • No motion control minigames
  • Not many playable characters

About the Author

Randy co-opted his family to help him with this review, and played roughly 12 hours across all boards and minigame compilations. Code was provided by Nintendo.
69 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
  • 69 results
  • 1
  • 2
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for supdou69
supdou69

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

MPs evening with friends will always be part of my memories. As a teenager, I played all of them. Always looking forward for a new one to call my friends to enjoy this absolute Fun Lucky digital board game.

Since the first MP, some disliked the luck part. Like any board game, the more you play the more you can rule out that luck part and enjoy the game as it becomes strategic…get to know the item to use item, how each board works and of course your friends' game plan! Haha !!!

This new MP is by far the best one in a looooooooong time. For me, I would say since MP2 and MP3.

Now that my friends and I move along with our adult life…let me tell you the online play is a must and fun way to connect over a game that brought us sooo many fun nights and friendly game arguments hahaha….

But 6…sorry I don’t agree just totally get the vibe of someone who hasn’t enjoyed this franchise…Oh well…I am happy to hear from others and not rule out the fun part of this game by this Unfair review…

3 • 
Avatar image for ziggens
ziggens

14

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@supdou69: playing the classics online with custom maps is way better

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-618bc23e9b1c9
deactivated-618bc23e9b1c9

7339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Honestly, I'm a bit confused about which MP game to start out with on Switch. The reviewer says the Super Mario Party is better, but a lot of posters are saying Mario Party Superstars is the best one to get.

As someone totally blind to the series, and who wants to play local couch co op with a friend, which one should I get?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for neurogia
Neurogia

600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@shadyacshuns:

If you want a Mario Party that feels like a real digital board game with strategy and items to use: get Mario Party SuperStars.

If you put the CPU characters to max difficulty, the mini games get really challenging to win!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ziggens
ziggens

14

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ziggens

What's silly is that majority of the population doesn't realize that we already have custom maps for the original Mario Party games with custom items and board events and online multiplayer so, any new mario party game is pretty much irrelevant since it can't get any better than that.

2 • 
Avatar image for mellamopizza
Mellamopizza

1

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@ziggens said:

What's silly is that majority of the population doesn't realize that we already have custom maps for the original Mario Party games with custom items and board events and online multiplayer so, any new mario party game is pretty much irrelevant since it can't get any better than that.

LOL I know right? Took the words Right out of my mouth. I have like 100 custom maps for the original 3 mario parties on my everdrive 64, and it's waaaaaaaay better than any of this crap could ever be! Custom maps, items, board events and who knows? We will probably be able to integrate more characters eventually too!

2 • 
Avatar image for rani26
Rani26

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Rani26

It is an amazing article.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for fredthemole
FredtheMole

1

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Wow, this might genuinely be one of the worst video game reviews I've ever read. In fact, this review made me even more excited to buy this game, which I suppose means that it was at least helpful. It's not fair to let your young children be the judge of a game just because it's a rated E game. I feel like this is a picture-perfect example of how not to perform a review. Do better, GameSpot.

3 • 
Avatar image for mw20054
Mw20054

1

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

dear GameSpot, Please let another person do the review, this person is going off the biased opinion of his young children isn't accurate at all as he said the previous edition (super mario party) was better than superstars which is clearly FALSE, as super mario party was one of the worst editions of the game. Next time have someone give a professional review of the game instead of giving a negative review just because his son didn't like it due to no Monty mole or the joy con motion control gimmick that his daughter wanted

4 • 
Avatar image for darkniter
Darkniter

1

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

GameStop please consider getting another reviewer for this particular game. As many pontied out this is the only site that gave 6 because the reviewer had a biased opinion because their kids didn’t like the classic mechanics. This game target audience are obviously the ones that played the N64 MPs, not being in many ways like previous Super Mario Party is actually a pretty good and refreshing “back to basics” feeling.

5 • 
Avatar image for zimerust
zimerust

130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Sounds like this reviewer just liked the worst mario party in the series, Super Mario Party. Yikes.

3 • 
Avatar image for sheep99
sheep99

1254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Mental institutions will be full when Nintendo fanboys see the score

Upvote • 
Avatar image for kizza_soze
Kizza_Soze

448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Nintendo's infamously deep gameplay was obviously too much for this reviewer. I'm sure IGN will give it a far better score...Maybe 6.5-7.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for hardwenzen
hardwenzen

42366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Shovelware after shovelware.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for stickemup
StickEmUp

2276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By StickEmUp

No motion control mini games is a huge Pro. That’s just one of the reasons the Mario Party games before the Wii are still the best.

I’d get this just because of that.

6 • 
Avatar image for Jarrkha
Jarrkha

633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Jarrkha

Fellow millennials (especially ones born in the mid-to-late 80's and maybe early 90s) should love this. We were actually the first kids ever to play Mario Party.

6 • 
Avatar image for starchaser19983
starchaser19983

19

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Jarrkha: Mid-to-late 80's is Gen Y.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for stickemup
StickEmUp

2276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@starchaser19983: Anyone born between ‘81 and ‘96 is considered to be a Millennial/Gen Y (They’re the same thing). Some places say between ‘80 and ‘95. Either way, they’re close enough.

Come on, man. It just takes a quick Google search to not comment incorrectly.

4 • 
Avatar image for starchaser19983
starchaser19983

19

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@stickemup: Millennial is the newer term but it really applies more to those born roughly late 80's through 1995 / 96. Gen Y still applies more to those born earlier in the 1980's because of their ability to remember the end of the Cold War period hence the generational term "Cold Y". They also succeeded Gen X and preceded Gen Z if you take out those more specifically referred to as millennials. The term millennial in my opinion is an unnecessary pop culture term and creates a lot of confusion.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for drift
Drift

3

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@starchaser19983: Actually Gen Y and Millennialsare different names for the same generation, which includes the 80s and 90s.

3 • 
Avatar image for starchaser19983
starchaser19983

19

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@drift: Gen Y applies more to the earlier part and millennial being a newer term applies to the younger half. I was born almost exactly in the middle of the generation and I hate being called the term millennial.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Jarrkha
Jarrkha

633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Jarrkha

@starchaser19983: NO IT DOESN'T.

X-Ennial (cross between Gen-X and Millennial) refers to the "transition" sub-generation born in the early-to-mid 80's - anyone progressively close to 40 years old or just above it. It's not dissimilar to the "Zillennial" term used to refer to the youngest Millennials and oldest Zoomers, in the mid/late 1990s ('96-2000).

Early-to-mid 80's, and even as early as '78 - depending on who you ask - is considered by some to be the last of Gen-X and the first of Gen-Y. As such, that highly "transitional" period is ambiguous. So consider that when thinking about the term, Gen-Y, because that term has never been ambiguous and is superseded by its own nickname.

And for the record, mid-to-late 80's ('84-'90; I count the "ten" years as the end of a decade and not just the beginning of the next one) is the Millennial group: the first cohort to be referred to as such and the first to be unambiguously Generation Y / Millennial .

Upvote • 
Avatar image for erustenebrus
ErusTenebrus

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

@starchaser19983: You shouldn't hate being called a millennial, you should hate PEOPLE using it as a catchall derogatory term for being "young" and "lazy" despite Gen Y/Millennials continuing the trend of better educated, more intelligent, more balanced in life values, and more in debt than previous generations.

I'm '88 and I "count" as millennial, I grew up at the turn of the millennium it makes sense.

Here's some examples of places using millennial and Gen Y synonymously:

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/

https://jeffjbutler.com/2019/03/19/what-is-the-difference-between-gen-ys-and-millennials/

And here's one that shows the split that some are insisting matters, but here's the problem with that:

https://www.kent.edu/yourtrainingpartner/gen-y-millennials-and-gen-z-do-you-know-difference

The split is literally Gen Y = 6 years and Millennials = 10. If that were the case Gen Y would be the SMALLEST generation to be labeled. Most generations span about 15-20ish years. This argument that Gen Y isn't the same as Millennials is silly, because then the generations go... it goes X, Y, Millennials, Z, Alpha instead of X, Y, Z, Alpha...

What's really stupid is that media still throws around millennial as an insult to the younger generation, when we're literally in our late twenties to early forties now. It's like they just use it as a "young people suck" term.

But that's always been a thing. We'll probably do it to Gen Beta or Bravo or whatever we're going into after Alpha.

2 • 
Avatar image for Jarrkha
Jarrkha

633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@erustenebrus: The media also uses "Millennial" as a derogatory/pejorative term when referring to young adults who aren't probably core Generation Y members. The goal posts keep getting moved for the term for any greenhorn/newbie worker entering the workforce and mucking things up. Generation Y is a term that is all but forgotten; haven't seen media use it regularly since the 'old days of browsing news sites via MSN.ca in the aughts.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for starchaser19983
starchaser19983

19

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@erustenebrus: In the case of what you're trying to prove to me the term should still be Generation Y. Like I already said it made the most sense coming after Gen X and another thing is that Gen Y was in fact the term even around the turn of the last millennium and later. That means that the oldest of the generation was 25, maybe even late 20's when they didn't just decide on this name change (the term caught on by the end of the 2000's before that it was mostly Gen Y") but the name became more commonly used. So yes I am insulted when something trendy like the term "millennial" just replaced something like Gen Y that I became used to by the time I was 20 was and was just decidedly changed by some upscale scholar or journalist somewhere who wanted the term to spread because of it catchiness. The name should be what it was in the first place even if someone born in 1982 is the same generation as someone born in 1993.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Jarrkha
Jarrkha

633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Jarrkha

@starchaser19983: Millennial is term invented close to 20 years ago. It hasn't been "trendy" since 2010.

And this is the wrong hill to battle on when it comes to bucking trends. Where was this fighting spirit for misusing and bastardizing other English words, like "literally," or the invention of lame terms like "deadass," or the misuse of the words "internet" (dropping 'net, "web" and others altogether), "content," etc.? Where is this fighting spirit against stupid fashion trends? Against things which are clearly luxuries but become chique & later "socially entitled," like air travel?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for rikku45
rikku45

887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

Lol a 6 and all the cons are actually good things.

10 • 
Avatar image for zimerust
zimerust

130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@rikku45: It's true, this review is horrible lol

4 • 
Avatar image for boodger
Boodger

2522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

No motion controls is a MAJOR plus for me. I have hated Mario Party games since the Wii because of the motion controls. Super Mario Party was lame because I hate playing with a single joycon, so everything about that point in the negative is a positive to me.

Also, I prefer the format of the old Mario Party games. So you say "stripped down", I say "back to the fundamentals"

8 • 
Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

Good review showcasing what the game will be like to the modern audience of Mario Party.

3 • 
Avatar image for TeslaCoi1
TeslaCoi1

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Complete hack review, lmao. Why are positive features listed as negatives? Motion controls not being a thing, and the series going back to its roots and getting rid of a lot of the new features from Super Mario Party etc, are very much good changes, not bad ones. I for one still hold Mario Party 2 and 5 as the by far best games in the series (and I've played every Mario Party game ever made, even those nightmarishly bad 9 and 10 games...), so I can't wait to play a game like this that finally takes the series back to the good old (superior) days of how it used to be before it all went downhill.

8 • 
Avatar image for zimerust
zimerust

130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@TeslaCoi1: The custom dice weren't even a good addition. It's GOOD to go back to everyone has the same dice...

3 • 
Avatar image for zimerust
zimerust

130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@TeslaCoi1: I read another "mixed" review for this game which said limited boards, when it in fact has 5 boards in comparison to the 4 shitty boards in Super Mario Party. Lol, what a joke. Some awful takes on this game so far.

3 • 
Avatar image for philip6k
philip6k

1389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@TeslaCoi1: 100% this. This review reads like it was written by a 14 year old. I was just going to say the exact same thing about the motion controls before I read your comment.

The last few iterations of the game have been awful and been trending downward for awhile now. Now they went back to the roots of the games everyone loved, and that's a negative now?

5 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-642321fb121ca
deactivated-642321fb121ca

7142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

This comment section really does show the Nintendo fans blind love.

2 • 
Avatar image for boodger
Boodger

2522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Random_Matt: This comment really does show the "everyone but me has poor taste" mentality

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Jarrkha
Jarrkha

633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@P00DGE: Uh, all the comments do.

I for one, also DIDN'T MIND the motion controls in Super Mario Party, and scoff at the baffled clap back present in at least 3 comments here.

2 • 
Avatar image for gr4h4m833zy
Gr4h4m833zy

858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Jeez. How is nintendo still alive? Metroid rocks but all the mario games are about the same. And i don't care, im going to say it. Breath of the wild was some of the most frustrating and boring crap I've ever played. I'd rather play immortals fenyx rising.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for what101
what101

234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@gr4h4m833zy: It's perfectly fine to dislike BoTW, it is rather odd for the same person that has that opinion to like Fenix Rising though.

This like Disliking GTA but liking Saints Row lol to each their own I guess.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for itchyflop
itchyflop

3687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 68

User Lists: 0

@gr4h4m833zy: Some hated the mechanics in BOTW.

Imo its one of the best games I've played.

I think the party games are a little overpriced like the wario titles but with friends/family its good.

2 • 
Avatar image for boodger
Boodger

2522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@gr4h4m833zy: People have different tastes than you I suppose.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

18818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 234

User Lists: 0

Edited By BassMan

So, which one are we up to now? Mario Party 37? Same old shit.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-618bc23e9b1c9
deactivated-618bc23e9b1c9

7339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@BassMan said:

So, which one are we up to now? Mario Party 37? Same old shit.

Then go play Battlefield 37 instead.

2 • 
Avatar image for philip6k
philip6k

1389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@BassMan: it's fun when you have friends to play it with

3 • 
Avatar image for neurogia
Neurogia

600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Mario Party SuperStars is not a stripped down experience. It's the correct Mario Party experience. ;)

6 • 
Avatar image for blockbuster
blockbuster

2098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

I've given up on this garbage website. They try so hard to be against the grain and different it's obviously sad. One of the only gaming sites giving this game a 6. I almost come here now for a good laugh..I think ive laughed enough now. I think I'll go okay Metroid because it's so unhorror like.

5 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-63e16ee307286
deactivated-63e16ee307286

19

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@blockbuster: This review score was given by the reviewers kids... So don't take it out on the site, just on unprofessionalism by the reviewer, lol

5 • 
Avatar image for zimerust
zimerust

130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@demonicusnyc: Yeah, this reviewer needs to get called out for this. You cant review a game based on what some toddlers think of it.

2 • 
  • 69 results
  • 1
  • 2