The Wheel of Time Season 1 Review - Amazon's Fantasy Show Stumbles Then Engrosses

The first season of the highly-anticipated Robert Jordan adaptation arrives this week.

Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy was a remarkable achievement on many levels, helping to establish a new standard for fantasy storytelling on screen. But despite its artistry and huge worldwide success, it didn't inspire many other filmmakers to tackle other great works of fantasy literature. It was HBO's Game of Thrones a decade later that truly opened the floodgates for tales of dragons and magic--from The Witcher and Cursed to Shadow and Bone and His Dark Materials, the last few years have seen a wealth of episodic fantasy adaptations. Amazon's The Wheel of Time is the latest.

The series is based on Robert Jordan's sprawling 14-book saga, and Season 1 primarily adapts the first novel, 1990's The Eye of the World. There's a lot to unpack in Episode 1, both in terms of characters and Jordan's intricately-designed world. It focuses on five young people from the forgotten backwater town of Two Rivers--Rand, Mat, Nynaeve, Perrin, and Egwene--who are visited one day by the mysterious and powerful Moiraine. She's a member of the Aes Sedai, an order of women which possess magical abilities known as the One Power. Moiraine believes that one of the five is the "Dragon Reborn," the reincarnation of a powerful figure from history who can save the world from evil. But the villainous Dark One is also on their trail, leading to a chase across hundreds of miles to reach the safety of the White Tower, home of the Aes Sedai.

It's always a challenge for writers to adapt much loved but detailed works of fantasy fiction when it comes to how much information to drop in order for those who haven't read the books to get a sense of the world. Episode 1 of The Wheel of Time struggles to strike the right balance. This is an expensive show and the screen version of Jordan's world looks impressive and lived in (some dodgy CGI notwithstanding), but there's no escaping just how generic it all seems. From the small Shire-esque town and the talk of magic and dragons to creatures attacking by night and a desperate quest, this is Fantasy TV 101. Obviously, the source material was heavily indebted to Tolkien too, but with sketchily drawn characters and some questionable acting in the early scenes, it feels disappointingly clunky and generic.

Thankfully, the season starts to pick up from Episode 2. While the first episode gave a lot of running time over to a big action scene, as the Dark One's Trollocs (horned orcs basically) attack Two Rivers, the next few episodes really give the characters time to breathe and develop. Rosamund Pike plays Moiraine and gives her a quiet intensity, ably conveying the huge burden she has taken on herself. The younger cast succeeds in differentiating their characters from one another, with Barney Harris's cocky Mat, Josha Stradowski's sensible Rand, and Madeleine Madden's ambitious Egwene, a young woman who possesses her own powers. In true fantasy quest style, the group gets quickly separated, and several episodes are spent cutting between their increasingly dangerous adventures as they make their way to the White Tower.

While it's initially hard to escape the feeling that much of this has all been done before, showrunner Rafe Judkins slowly reveals the details of the world, avoiding too many exposition dumps (there are some obviously). These include different tribes who occupy the land--most notably the malevolent Light and the peace-loving Leaf--the practices of the Aes Sedai, who are all teamed with a faithful male servant known as a Warder, and the Wheel of Time itself, which rotates through seven ages, ensuring that what has already happened will occur again. For the most part, action and thrills are well balanced with character-based drama--the pace is relatively slow and some viewers might want a few more battles and a few less introspective speeches. But Judkins gets credit for using the eight-hour running time of this first season to develop a steady, engrossing pace.

The Wheel of Time isn't as intensely gory as Game of Thrones--and totally avoids any suggestion of sexual violence--but this isn't a show for younger kids. The fight sequences are bloody with quickly cut but gruesome stabbings and dismemberments, and there is a nasty torture scene in Episode 5. All of this helps add to the brutal reality of the world, but it's certainly a lot stronger than the Lord of the Rings movies.

Amazon clearly has high hopes for The Wheel of Time, with a $10 million budget per episode and a second season already in production. Of course, the studio also has its Lord of the Rings series waiting in the wings, and inevitably The Wheel of Time might seem like a small footnote once that hits. But that's a while off, and this first season emerges as one of the most successful of the current crop of fantasy shows.

The Good

  • Impressive world-building
  • High production values
  • Well paced
  • Strong performance

The Bad

  • The first episode is messy
  • Some bad CGI
  • It can feel generic

About the Author

14 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for Deltath
Deltath

88

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The characters in the book aren't from a town called "Two Rivers". "THE" Two Rivers is a region, like the Midwest. They're from the town of Emond's Field. Is this actually changed in the show or is this just a mistake by the reviewer?

2 • 
Avatar image for valgaav_219
Valgaav_219

3134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 5

@Deltath: They never mentioned Emonds Field. I guess I missed that until you mentioned it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for maccobb
MacCobb

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

any comparison's between GoT and WoT are born of ignorance

2 • 
Avatar image for Deltath
Deltath

88

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@maccobb: While the stories themselves aren't similar, the comparison here is mostly in terms of production scope, budget and the audience it's attempting to attract. It would be ignorant to deny that.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64a3ced8b46b8
deactivated-64a3ced8b46b8

5977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

@maccobb: While I absolutely get your point, (inasmuch as the tone is completely different between the two), it is a stretch to say that comparisons are born of ignorance. I think you could take quite a few fantasy series and reasonably compare them, (WoT, GoT, LotR, and The Sword of truth series instantly come to mind).

I find it hard to believe that you can't see how stories within the same genre could be compared, (even if on a broader level). With WoT and GoT, we're talking apples and oranges here, not bananas and hand grenades. 🙂

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bookfan8780
bookfan8780

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Having read the books years ago I can see where it could feel generic. But then again, if you read most of the fantasy novels out there, even the "most popular" ones, they all have similarities or tropes.

I think the depth of the world Robert Jordan created in his books is a hindrance in this case, as it's hard to convey the size and uniqueness of this world without too many exposition dumps or having an even larger budget to show all the various nations.

I'm going to watch it and try to enjoy it for what it is, rather than comparing to the books. At least the books are finished, so we don't have a GoT situation on our hands in that sense.

2 • 
Avatar image for clearvision
clearvision

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

@bookfan8780: Anything that's Fantasy and not good enough to qualify as "Literature" with a big fat L, is by definition generic and derivative. Am-I-riite?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Dave1927p
Dave1927p

228

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Dave1927p

I feel like if gamespot liked it, most of us probably won’t.

3 • 
Avatar image for clearvision
clearvision

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

@Dave1927p: @Dave1927p:Dear sir, can you please explain-a One Thing for me: why do most of us come-a keepin-a back 'ere?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64a3ced8b46b8
deactivated-64a3ced8b46b8

5977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

Referring to warders as servants really diminishes the dynamic they have with the Aes Sedai they are bonded with.

Call them partners, or even comrades. Hell, call them bodyguards if you want. But servants just doesn't quite fit.

3 • 
Avatar image for valgaav_219
Valgaav_219

3134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 5

@thecupidstunts: They also made the mistake of saying that every Aes Sedai has a warder. That's not true. I'm pretty sure The Red Ajah won't even bond a warder because they hate men.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64a3ced8b46b8
deactivated-64a3ced8b46b8

5977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

@valgaav_219: While you're correct that not all Aes Sedai have warders, the Reds not bonding warders changed later in the series, (I think it started with Knife of Dreams, if I remember correctly).

It's more as a function of finding a way to control men who can channel, (Asha'man), but it was still a big departure for the Red ajah.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for clearvision
clearvision

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

@thecupidstunts: Totally. It's so weird. Are you Harry Potter fan by any chance?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64a3ced8b46b8
deactivated-64a3ced8b46b8

5977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

@clearvision: I think Harry Potter is decent, but never got completely sucked in. You?

Upvote •