Why play Duke Nukem 3D in 2005?

User Rating: 2.5 | Serious Sam II PC
By afpabon | Review Date:
I must start saying I never really cared too much for Duke Nukem 3D. Sure, it was a funny little game, but with Quake being released a few months later, who could care for a 2D shooter? The "3D" part of the title made it even a bit funny.

Flash forward 9 years, and another shooter comes up. One with crappy graphics, reminiscent of Duke Nukem 3D ones 9 years before, and with a character that can only be described as a Duke-wannabe. Not happy enough to rip off a 9-year-old classic, the developers then wanted to make it a challenging experience. So instead of developing a good AI, or at least good maps, they cranked up the number of enemies you had to fight. All at once.

What kind of fun could that be? If I wanted to blast away zillions of dumb enemies I'd go play Robotron, thank you very much.

This game is awful, and by no means I could recommend anyone at all to try it.

Other Helpful Reviews for Serious Sam II

Load Comments (0)