I'm not going to trash talk the game, no I blame the developers and the publishers for creating this game, and the publishers for letting this pass. It's like they didn't even care. If there was one thing I could say about the game, it's that it's short lived terrible gameplay. The enviorments feel washed out, but I will say if it adds anything, the weapons are original yet cool. But other than that I don't feel like this game is special. The graphics look like a dirty cloth, the controls don't work at all, the game not to mention is super short. The game is probally the most easy short lived game I've EVER played. You will never die. I sat in a pile of enemies, let them shoot and melee me, and still I never died, the rarest of times by mines that the icon to disarm them fails to apear in time. And overall, I feel really that the devlopers should have cared. I think that the presentation is terrible, the bang for the buck is not there period. I give the game a 3, "DON'T BUY IT PERIOD"!
Other Helpful Reviews for The History Channel: Battle for the Pacific
First off the only disappointing thing that I have encountered with this game is it's controls. The control setup is so bad that it detracts massively from the game. Your shots register alright, but the control setup is ... Read Full Review
Battle for the pacfic. First thing that comes to mind means a bad game casue its made by history channel which is known for it s bad games. Why do think this game is hard to find, i wonder why. Cause it just sucks. D... Read Full Review
