No

User Rating: 3 | The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt PC

CD Projekt is a very annoying developer. It's like that kid at school constantly boasting with grandiose gestures, in an attempt to inflate themselves up in-spite of what actual reality might exist.

I recall sometime back, when attempting to pitch the now failed White Wolf gamer, CDP slipped in a message within the trailer, denouncing naysayers of pc gaming, singing it's praises - a reoccurring motif.

Flash forward to present. Upon booting the Witcher 3 up, the first thing that became noticeable was how uninitiative the control scheme was, simple left, right, backward and forward commands creating an involuntary jerk, ice-rink like. Simple navigation ordering the character towards a ladder in the opening tutorial unnecessarily obtuse.

Further in, the opening battle, the very first in the same, a bizarre assortment of key layouts, a targeting system that dictates who and what you will be hitting on a whim, and sluggish, ice rink control system in which skill, but rather madly bashing keys fells enemies.

Contrary to claims, this is not a complex game. It is a simple WASD, with hit and block controls. Many games, none built specifically with pc in mind intuitively work well. Darksiders for example, both I/II have far more complex gameplay mechanics than the Witcher 3, yet quite happily operate on either a gamepad or keyboard.

And that's where the experience ends. Rightly so.

Many gamers and critics alike, appear to have wholly ignored the most basic, fundamental aspects of a game, n favor of praising it's cinematic. It's an unfortunate trend in gaming, cinephiles putting the value of gaming itself as a back-burner, an inconsequential nascence to get to the next cutscene.

Recently playing Phantom Hour Glass helped heighten this impression. While the Witcher 3 ignores the fundamentals with aspirations of maturity, Phantom Hour Glass revels in it's child like nature pinning down it's simple control scheme (1 touch) to create more from less, with less being of a higher caliber than more.

The Witcher 3's graphical praise is also somewhat confusing. A game like Mad Max for example, looks fantastic and can easily run 60fps on modest hardware. Likewise, even a very old game, like Grand Theft Auto 4, makes up for it's lack of pixel power, through sheer amount of detail in the game-world.

Comparatively The Witcher 3 is a demanding game to many open world titles, with a lack of polish. An abundance of clipping, dead eye's NPC's staring into space and poor animations. While certainty not a bad looking game, it's pretty far from being deemed one the best looking and given it's visuals VS performance, it's quite poor in that regard.

Overall, the Witcher 3 is a big pile of crap, and I hope it burns.

No Caption Provided

3 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

63714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

Lovely stuff.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for tomterry
Tomterry

14

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

What? CD Projekt Red literally owns gog.com which is the only authentic drm free website which is more consumer friendly than steam. How is CD Projekt Red annoying? They have done consumer friendly stuff countless times. Even though they can technically be as greedy as they want to.

Witcher 3 was very good. The only problem was that the combat was not as responsive or fast like Bloodborne. But still it was decent. Animations were satisfactory too. It still had less bugs than any fallout games or even Stalker games. I loved fallout New vegas and found Stalker games very interesting but seriously if you even take out the combat of Witcher 3 and consider it"just" an rpg with only choices and dialogues. It still would be a very solid game. It still can stand alone as a game like The Walking dead or something and even then people would praise it.

The game is polished. Your computer might not be good considering that you encountered many bugs or unpolished stuff because in my system the bugs were rare. I did not encounter any game breaking bugs. Also The soundtrack is amazing too.

I agree on control scheme part. It is not very intuitive but I got used to it.

The expansions of Witcher 3 were also jaw dropping. The expansion literally has approximately 40 hours of meaningful stuff. Even hearts of stone had 19 hours of stuff. The story in blood and wine was also amazing.

I can understand you did not like Witcher 3 , but saying CD Projekt Red is annoying is an ignorant and probably dishonest claim.

You did not even consider expanding on animations,graphics,even ragdoll physics or just general amount of content in such scale rpg with active action combat.

"Poor" animations is just a useless label. Like poor compared to what? Fallout? Stalker? Elder Scrolls? Or did you just compared it to specifically action oriented games like Bloodborne or dark souls which have very simple and low scale rpg elements. And even animations in dark souls and bloodborne could be janky,rigid some rare times. Btw a professional animator on youtube called "PlayFrame" considered animations in witcher 3 to be pretty good. Although I can agree that sword unsheathing animation is a little immersion breaking.

I am sorry but this is really an awful review. Or awful opinion I should say.

I can write more. But I do not want to if you just consider me a "fanboy" at this point. But to be honest, if games should be criticized for being lazy or awful then reviews should also be criticized for being lazy or awful. That is why I thought of analyzing your review and stating my opinion on your review.

Sorry for being a little rude.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ghosts4ever
Ghosts4ever

26276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

Excellent review. the game suck.

Upvote •