88 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
  • 88 results
  • 1
  • 2
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for KimCheeWarriorX
KimCheeWarriorX

440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

boy were they off with their 1080p, 60fps statement

Upvote • 
Avatar image for andrew_ribbons
andrew_ribbons

4152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

Yes but the PS4 is the console with the power to do it in 1080p 60fps. WAIT!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for navy125
Navy125

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Navy125

Ok what was the use of even buying a next Gen system if these games are not in 1080p. I mean come on its not next Gen then. I spent $530 dollars on my console can a developer please give me my moneys worth.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for RevLux
RevLux

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By RevLux

@navy125 Any game could run in 1080p at 60fps on either the XB1 or PS4. Though to do so you must sacrifice other, in the developer's view, more important aspects of a game's graphical fidelity. Which would essentially defeat the purpose. Since you would be left with a game in 1080p that offers a less impressive experience over all. Both systems are capable of far more than their predecessors. It takes time for the true potential of a new generation of consoles to be realized though.


All these complaints that "If it can't run everything in native 1080p then it's not next gen" are frankly silly. The more people that demand 1080p above all else the more likely devs will skimp on things like a.a., texture detail, and essentially every other important aspect of a game's graphical fidelity just to hit 1080p. Which would then be the new "it" thing to complain about "on the line."

Upvote • 
Avatar image for tchanah
tchanah

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

@navy125 As it turns out next gen really don't have what it takes!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for KimCheeWarriorX
KimCheeWarriorX

440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

@tchanah @navy125 or it could be that theyre still getting the hang of familiarizing themselves with these consoles' hardware. first generation software on a game console usually adds up to subpar performance in the visuals department during its first generation of game releases. i say usually because it was the opposite for the 360, which isnt typical.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for tchanah
tchanah

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

@KimCheeWarriorX @tchanah @navy125 Agreed. I was talking with the 'PC FAN BOY' blood rush :D

Yes we will have to wait and see and all the same keep in mind nothing is perfect and technology really can't catch up with it selves these days!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for elleclouds
elleclouds

125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Anyone else remember the reveal of this game.....seems like 10 years ago.....what a bunch of bullsh*t Ubisoft...bad Ubi, bad Ubi.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for onixevil
onixevil

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By onixevil

If the Wii U version will run at 1080p but with dated textures .Will you keep igniting "Res" war ?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Ripper_TV
Ripper_TV

2972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 1

Now this is a REAL TESTIMONY of the "power" the new consoles hold. Game looks like a this gen GTA and they can only run it in 900p.


Nothing but pathetic.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for RevLux
RevLux

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By RevLux

@Ripper_TV First of all it looks much better in most respects than GTA V on the p.c. and next gen systems. Secondly it is a cross-generation game. We will never see the true potential of the new systems until developers begin focusing on solely on them and p.c. That's how it's always been when new consoles come out. You people sure love to complain though. I'll give you that. If only pointless complaining were a lost art...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for miinoh
Miinoh

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

People have been arguing about which one to prioritize, resolution or frame rate. Now you have neither. All I hear are excuses and white washing of the the discrepancies between the hype they have generated and the grim reality. Don't get me wrong, gameplay is still the king. But wouldn't be nicer to have good gameplay while enjoy some promised true next gen graphics. I am growing less and less interested in this game. The devs are either incompetent to fulfill their promise or straight out lying through their teeth from day one.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for hilith
Hilith

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

Edited By Hilith

@miinoh You are of course right. Anyone with minimal understandings of hardware knows this generation is doomed as it lacks the power to evolve like others did.

The trend in gaming now are open worlds, and you just can't have giant open worlds at full true 1080p and 60fps with the current consoles no matter what the devs do.

So while this console generation dies and promises to end consoles for good we have fanboys flaming each others over a few differences in resolution not realizing the future is a downhill slope for all.

Did I mention 2k 4k? Sony is know focusing on making 4k TVs like everyone other manufacturer and 4k gaming is light years away from this console generation.


Upvote • 
Avatar image for FretsOfDeath
FretsOfDeath

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By FretsOfDeath

@miinoh I would go with lying. all part of the over hype this game is receiving. By the time it's released less and less people are going to give a shit, and it won't sell half as good as it would have last year.


With all of the 'true' specs for next gen games coming to surface, I am starting to consider spending my money on a $600 PC over next gen console more and more these days.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for FretsOfDeath
FretsOfDeath

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By FretsOfDeath

absolutely pathetic. if there are games on last gen that could run at 1080p, then there is no reason or excuse as to why next gen console games can't run at full 1080p @ 60fps 100% of the time, when the hardware is more than 10X more powerful. if it weren't for some of the next gen exclusives coming out that I want to play, I would otherwise find no need in owning a next gen console.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for hilith
Hilith

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

@FretsOfDeath Games evolved faster 10X more power means nothing. Open worlds need a lot of power and consoles just can't handle it

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Verityrant
Verityrant

125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I am sad to hear this. Weren't many of the dev companies the ones screaming about how they needed a new console generation to realize their vision, and how we players want a new console generation even if we don't know it yet? Now we have it, and the players have bought into it, and these same devs can't seem to even accomodate the baseline of graphic standards with these systems. 1080 and 60 fps or bust. We did our part, and shelled out for the new consoles with enough power to deliver the graphics that the devs said they needed and we wanted whether we knew it or not, now it is time for them to man up and deliver.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for robbiejones
robbiejones

236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By robbiejones

whenever i see the xbone games come out at "792p" it comes across just embarrassing. Just stick to 720p if they can't get the frame-rate at a solid 30fps.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Sevenizz
Sevenizz

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I still don't care about a futuristic Ass Creed game.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-58270bc086e0d
deactivated-58270bc086e0d

2317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 113

User Lists: 0

That is excellent news (if it is true and Ubi aren't just lying their ass off) but I still think they should have gone further. 720p, 60fps and whatever graphics they need to use to get there.

The differences in resolution are minimal unless you are sat stupidly close to a massive TV or your TV is particularly massive to start with. Resolution makes the game smoother but most console games already have limited graphical fidelity anyway.

But I think 60fps should be the next gen standard.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for hilith
Hilith

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

@Dannystaples14 Next gen is currently heading into streaming games making the "consoles" hardware not so important. We will basically need to have internet connects and far better ones, and everyone can say what they want but there ain't stopping this.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for -s3r6i0-
-S3R6i0-

156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

And here I was upset about still only having a PS3. I guess if the game is capable of running on an old console it wasn't very advanced to begin with. This game is over-hyped, anyway.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ArchoNils2
ArchoNils2

10534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I preordered it with my launch Ps4 expecting the system to easely run 1080p at 60Hz. Now a year later I switch to the Pc version

2 • 
Avatar image for starjay009
starjay009

792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By starjay009

It's time XBOX and Microsoft fans accept that their system of choice is simply not good enough to compete with the PS4. PC gamers, stay out of this. The consoles will surely be able to run this game well, A fact which MANY PC gamers including myself will not be able to say. Many PC games don't run well enough and do justice to modern rigs thanks to poor ports, system specific bugs, crashes, overheating etc. Knowing Ubisoft and their fascination with DRM, I expect similar poor performances on PC with this game. PS4 is the BEST system on next gen. It's a fact which is finally coming through and Microsoft are indirectly acknowledging it as well, thanks to a price cut yet again.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Sevenizz
Sevenizz

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Sevenizz

If graphics are a priority to you - why are you a console gamer? PC will always have the upper hand.

I'm gonna assume you owned a PS2 over an original Xbox that had twice it's power and every multiplat looked glaringly different. What's that? You did own a PS2? Thought so.

Marketing sells consoles, not graphics. Historically, the stronger system rarely wins the race.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bldgirsh
BldgIrsh

3044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

Edited By BldgIrsh

... Please don't label yourself as a PC gamer...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ArchoNils2
ArchoNils2

10534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Lol? If your Pc overheats it is your fault xD

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Metalnoid
Metalnoid

1314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Pretty good, really funny! "But" the only gamers, who still doesn't know if the game is going to run properly on day one, are the PC gamers.





Upvote • 
Avatar image for predatorGS
predatorGS

46

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

@Metalnoid How's that? The specs are known, so you can find out for yourself if your PC can handle it. Furthermore, you can change settings on the PC version.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for StonerDemon
StonerDemon

1041

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Considering how hard is for developers to display their hd games on these "next gen" consoles, the only explanation I can think about is that Sony and MS are planning to shrink the consoles life cycle to 5 years.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for hilith
Hilith

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

@StonerDemon Make it 3 or 4, and by then the difference between consoles and PCs will be like playing PS2 in 2014 with less good games

Upvote • 
Avatar image for riksterinto1
riksterinto1

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Why is the self proclaimed "master race" acting like this is news? Did you really think that this generation was going to perform better than PC? The last generation of consoles was running games at HD upscaled 580p while PC was running the same games at 1080p. Nothing has changed.


Quality of graphic effects and gameplay are way more important to console gamers than resolution. Console gamers won't notice the difference because they aren't sitting 2 feet away from the screen.

2 • 
Avatar image for StonerDemon
StonerDemon

1041

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By StonerDemon

PS4: The gamer oriented console.

X1: The crazy resolutions console.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for hilith
Hilith

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

Edited By Hilith

@StonerDemon Keep telling yourself that. Do you even realize that at the current rate games are improving this console generation will have a life of 3-4 years max?

Currently games are being downgraded to work on both consoles so what do you expect in just 1 or 2 years from now? With 2k, 4K resolutions on the horizon and waiting to become mainstream this console generation was dead from the beginning.

So continue to argue about who was the better resolution for the little time you have, but trust me, the numbers won't go up for either of them in the future.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for kik4444
kik4444

298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By kik4444

So if you want the truly "next gen" version, you're gonna have to play it on PC

Upvote • 
Avatar image for starjay009
starjay009

792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@kik4444 We have heard that bullshit before. Try something new and yeah, enjoy your crashes and stutters.

2 • 
Avatar image for robbiejones
robbiejones

236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@starjay009 @kik4444 and also hackers in multiplayer.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for kik4444
kik4444

298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@starjay009 @kik4444 I've never had stuttering or crashing from a ubisoft game before (except for AC3, which was horribly optimized and seriously underutilizing the GPU, but that counts as lag and not crashing or stuttering)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for theKSMM
theKSMM

1257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Edited By theKSMM

Mmm....click bait...

It's odd to see the PS4 getting the same derision this time around that had been previously reserved for the XONE. But I'll say it again: We console gamers have had very few games that run at 1080p and even fewer of those that run at 60 fps. So why are we acting like we've been robbed of some precious benchmark that we've never achieved anyway?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DefconRave
DefconRave

806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

"True Next Gen open world game" lolololol.


Most anticlimatic "gen" ever.

4 • 
Avatar image for virtuasega
virtuaSEGA

1448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

So now instead of sony or one fanboys we have to put up with pc morons, yippie.

2 • 
Avatar image for robbiejones
robbiejones

236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@virtuasega They have to much time on their hands. Guess they needed a break from their 100th play-through of WOW

Upvote • 
Avatar image for botroo3
botroo3

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Both Sony and Microsoft really should have upped the specs of the new Gen consoles... both released mid/low range PCs, unlike last Gen because they didn't want to take a hit on every console sold, we are going to suffer the next 6-8 years if average looking games are already sub 1080p and only 30 fps, frankly I don't think they are too far from Wii U hardware, since this game will most likely be 720p on Wii U and will have second screen functions.
Upvote • 
Avatar image for XAF1
XAF1

389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

So, pretty much most of us that bought next gen consoles only wanted a game made with last gen in mind. If the resolution is lower then the frame rate should have been higher. The compromise needs to be reasonable and to me it's not. In Ubisoft having more time to better optimize all aspects of the game it decided to go the easy route and just add more of what it wanted weighing the performance down instead causing it to sacrifice resolution and frame rate. I think that if the Xbox One and PS4 would have been more complicated and less closer to the architecture of PCs that a great deal of developers would be in trouble when it came to getting out their games. As a consumer/gamer just remember you only get what you accept If you start off accepting below par you will always get below par because you said it was ok. I've had this game reserved since last year, at 1st on the Xbox 360 and then switched to the PS4 version but now I think I will cancel the reservation and wait for global ratings before picking it up at some point. I can wait a little longer.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for HybridExtreme
HybridExtreme

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 1

Edited By HybridExtreme

While I'm glad that Ubisoft focused on gameplay over visuals, it does bother me a little bit that A) They are mentioning this now only days away from launch, after people already pre-ordered and B) That they couldn't achieve full 1080P at 60 FPS on either next gen console. I know that visuals aren't the 'end all' to gaming but its important and in this day and age of technology there should be no excuse for it. I'm sure resolution drop won't make it any less enjoyable to play but we bought next gen systems to play next gen games on didn't we? I know I did.

2 • 
Avatar image for blackdiamondsss
BlackDiamondsSs

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@HybridExtreme Ur right

Upvote • 
Avatar image for cws3e
cws3e

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

So doesn't this mean Sony flat out lied a couple of days ago??

Upvote • 
Avatar image for HybridExtreme
HybridExtreme

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 1

@cws3e Sony had posted the information based on specs given to them by Ubisoft.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bldgirsh
BldgIrsh

3044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

Source?

Upvote • 
  • 88 results
  • 1
  • 2