GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.
i think it was a good game and surly its better than first version and the lights make the game active and its the way to make people excited in cinema its like action films.
i played it " demo " not that good :) ,, looks like that u play inside a video camera,,, lot of flashing things ,, u cant focus in the game ,, there are many games worth ur money ,,, but not this
Looks much improved compared to the first game. Of course thats a couple of years back, the biggest letdown was sloppy controls. lets hope the made this one count.
@ Vintendo_64 There is no point. I watched a video on Fallout vegas then watched this, just a simply comment on the different graphics. @Aaron__1127 They are different games, but I think the same graphical standard should be applied. I can understand they don't use the same physics engine for example, but I don't see why just because one is an action game another is an ARPG the difference in graphical technology can be 3 years.