Nintendo Switch Wins Black Friday, Call of Duty: WW2 Nerfs! - GS News Roundup

Life is Strange sees the return of Ashly Burch, and COD: WWII brings back multiplayer to the Headquarters social space!

Show Info

GameSpot News

GameSpot News

Airs Daily

Join Jess McDonell every weekday for a punchy wrap-up of the biggest news to come out of video games!

8 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for Jdzspace
Jdzspace

1163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Jdzspace

So, can we like bury Microsoft now? Can we just not talk about them as a legitimate gaming option? Because it feels like they were in a desperation mode already, and to get destroyed by 3 consoles for the last 3 seperate consoles the last 3 months, including the "new" consoles launch month.

can they just sort of, i don't know, go away or something?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Dirty_Window
Dirty_Window

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

I miss Start/Select :(

2 • 
Avatar image for jinzo9988
jinzo9988

2457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jinzo9988

I feel like a small part of the Switch's success right now in the present is how badly the big boys of game development are shitting the bed right now. On one side, you've got lootboxes in a single player experience, a publisher that tried to profit from a man's death with DLC, progression in multiplayer being completely random and tied to lootboxes, XP earnings being secretly taken away from you while the developers lie to your fucking face because they don't want you to earn lootboxes and would rather that you pay for them, publishing studios claiming that developing games is expensive and that's why microtransactions have to be in them meanwhile they turn them off in the biggest release they have all year and tell their investors it won't affect their earnings, here comes UFC 3 with a shitshow of a lootbox system... and on the other, I'm sitting here with my Switch laughing. I'd like to believe that some people are in the same boat as me where Nintendo is looking far more attractive standing next to its friends by comparison because they're that ugly right now.

I think this little personal anecdote might sum up the big boys best for me. Every once and awhile me and the guys at work go down for a coffee run in the afternoon and I've been grabbing Doritos every once and awhile to take a shot at winning an Xbox One X via a contest currently going on. My plan if I win? To sell the stupid thing, not to actually play it. That's how turned off I am, where I wouldn't even indulge them if a free console were to come my way.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for guudgidga
guudgidga

301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

Edited By guudgidga

@jinzo9988: "Publisher that tried to profit from a man's death"

What happened?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jinzo9988
jinzo9988

2457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jinzo9988

@guudgidga: Forthog Orc-slayer was supposed to be a $5 piece of DLC for Shadow of War as a day-1 DLC option. The proceeds go to the family of a member of Monolith's team who had died of cancer during the making of the game. Sounds great, right? Well, if you read the fine print, $3.50 of the $5 per sale was to go to the family. It only applied to sales in the US, and further still certain states were excluded from the charity. So essentially WB/Monolith would've made 100% of the sale in certain states and everywhere outside of the US.

The backlash they got was nuclear to say the least and eventually it came to be that Forthog was released for free. It was the right move in the end, but once again somebody over there misstepped horribly, and WB are the folks that were too busy working on DLC to patch and fix Arkham Origins. They were the folks that outsourced Arkham Knight's PC port to a tiny studio, they knew it was a fucking mess of a game because it was a mess a year before its initial release date and did not call for a delay to fix it and just released it anyway. Given Arkham Origin's treatment and Arkham Knight's state on the PC, I think they banked on Steam still not having a refund policy for Knight. It's broken? Who cares. They can't get a refund and it'll sell anyway. Of course, Steam introduced the refund policy in June 2015 and Arkham Knight came out weeks later so there went that, but here comes WB offering full refunds to everyone that wanted one because it looks good in the press... as if that was needed because Steam offered that anyway.

Point being... when WB has that kind of track record, one can call Forthog a misstep in planning. I'm more inclined to believe some bloodsucker over there wanted to profit from a man's death, much like I'm inclined to believe EA is deliberately sitting in boardrooms conducting research and planning out how to exploit people with gambling addictions via lootboxes and how to create new addicts rather than simply misreading the market.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for professor_megaman
Professor_Megaman

160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

So many third-party developers...

So many millions in sales lost...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Megavideogamer
Megavideogamer

6554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

Edited By Megavideogamer

The Nintendo Switch doing well on Black Friday. Fentenyl time for the game industry.

2 • 
Avatar image for chiefwiggum16
chiefwiggum16

2826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By chiefwiggum16

@Megavideogamer: My cousin just died last week because of fentenyl...no joke and not funny.

Upvote •