Best RTS of the year!
The campaign is great and challenging, the control are easy to get used to, about 5-10 minute you will be used to it, the gameplay is instense and the type recalling me the ground control 2, the previous project of massive ent, actually you will find them very close to each other, for the gameplay, they both need to drop-in troops, control important points, call in airstrikes.
There is only some questions in mind after you finish the campaign, like, if they could use nuclear weapons, then why don't just nuke them out when all russians are still in seattle? Why they need to wait when both side are mounting up casualties and usde it in just a battle? Or why don't simply, nuke moscow? Or why russia don't just nuke washington? Do they still think this is cold war? It isn't! It is world war 3 man!
And, about china joining the USSR side in 1989 is totally nonsense, anyone who dig history and policy would know that china and USSA spit away after 1964, when their conflicts arises(Diabong island inicent), china EVEN come close to america and the west in early 1980, they helped, just like america, to rebel the soviet invasion in afganistan war in 1979-1989! And now is 1989 when china is close to the US and while the US EVEN aid chinese PLA army with supplies, and this setting is telling that china would fight against US? I don't think so..
BTW, in 1989, china still havn't had any serious landing troops to cross entire pacifc oceans to america.
But besides all these ridiculous setting, this is definitly the best strategy ever!!
About it multiplayer, it's instense, just like singleplayer..
Another cons is that it doesn't have any skirmish in singleplayer..suck..
Pros:Instense gameplay, stunning graphic, best RTS of the year, immersive, great multiplayer, great sound.
Cons: Campaign end in a flash in 10-20 hours, NO skirmish, ridiculous story setting.
Graphic:9.5/10
Gameplay:9.5/10
Presentation:9/10
Sound:10/10
Value:9/10
Overrall:9.5/10