After reading both the good and bad reviews here, I had to jump in and see for myself. I'm a fan of both the slower more strategic games like Combat Mission, Civilizatoin and also the rock, scissor, paper games like Battfield. I'll just get straight to the point on Conflict in Arms, the campaign mode is annoying, scripted, terrible voice acting and unbelievable story. It's best used as an advanced training ground. The basic training you get at the beggining of the game, however, will be good engough for most because one of the great things about the game is how accesible it is and easy to jump into. I played the first couple missions in the campaign and was annoyed so went right to multiplayer. The multiplayer is a fantastic strategy fest. It is rock sissors paper but with about 50+ different rock scissor papers to choose from. The other people online were friendly and there was always one experienced player gonard on the team that was able to provide strategy direction to the team and newbies like myself. The more team work the better your results will be, but you usually have a good balanced team of experienced and nonexperienced players because the game does a good job of balancing teams. Pulling it all together are the brilliently good grapics and sounds. I was really pulled into this game and have to agree with the people who gave it a really high rating.
Other Helpful Reviews for World in Conflict (Collector's Edition)
Kind of disappointing to me. It seems like you are just moving all of your units to circle areas on the ground to control a specific area. All you have to do to win is put your forces in these circles and have a repair... Read Full Review
Ok...let me start off by saying after playing this game a good amount of time it is one of the best games Ive played it quite a while and I am NOT a rts fan really. A bit of background....Ive been playing computer gam... Read Full Review
