Activision aware gamers want 'better-looking' Call of Duty

How about you guys wait a year or two to make it look even nicer?

Thought not.

Do something good 3arc ....i believe in you!

What I want is a new and interesting game, not some rehash with slightly improved graphics.

Yea, I think we're ready for next gen. I don't think this generation of consoles is incapable of bigger and better things, but a new console is really the only catalyst that will force Activision to get off their a** and step it up.

When'd they take a hint? Also, I saw the trailer, the graphics on the talking guy were good but actually gameplay looked poor.

Okay, so they make it better looking. And that's about it.

i just want 2143

Sure...... BLOPS: 2 will have better graphics.......just like every year they say the same stuff. Lemmings.....I swear.

Simply put, CoD can't look much better than it does while maintaining 60 FPS (which is a huge reason people play CoD over games like Battlefield, because of the responsiveness).

I read it as "We hear you, so we'll tweak some random things so you can't say we didn't do as you asked, but you'll see no difference"

I find it funny how so many people complain about CoD yet it's the best selling series ever meaning that 90% of people who moan about and call it trash are hypocrites and have bought and played it themselves.

I love CoD SP, yeah it needs updating and things added but it's still a fun game, that's what I want, fun. Not many FPS games are different, the only thing BF3 has over CoD is graphics, BF3's SP was basically a rip off of MW2 and Black OPs.

Took them about 5 games to get the hint. I wonder how long it will take them to realize that they are destroying video gaming as a whole

Asking CoD to make significant changes to its gameplay is an effort in futility. When a series breaks sales records every single year, real changes are a risk that Activision's shareholders won't allow.When the next CoD releases for the Next Xbox and PS4, you can bet there will be a real graphics improvement, but the gameplay will still be CoD 4 for most intents and purposes.

i rather have a decent storyline for once... I like cod games but i don't even touch the SP until a storm knocks out my internet for a day. not kidding. it's fast and fun gameplay but the story is a complete mess.

wow i bought MW2 for 60 bucks..BIGGEST MISTAKE OF MY LIFE!..some friend on xlive gave me free code for gears 2 expansion pack so that i could play on expansion maps with his team...i felt bad n offered him my mw2 copy..he said he doesn't want that trash lol..i said it's almost brand new..he apologized politely but said thank you anyway..i literally put the game in trash next day cause i knew i wasn't gonna play it..i hate to trade in games with gamestop..better throw games away than get ripped off! true story.

I think it's funny and sad. People want the graphics to look like BF 3 with real time radiosity and all that other stuff which requires huge processing power. At the same time they want it to run at 60 fps. On consoles, you simply can't have both.

Heck, even High end PCs barely run BF3 at its highest setting (Ultra) above 60 fps and you want a 6 year old console to do that? It's not gonna happen. It's that simple.

@ALCHEMYSTO Although I am not a fan of Zombies, I agree with you. People want Zombies, and they should listen to their fans. But think about it, something as popular as Zombies, and from the same company that does this game, it will get played out just like COD once they see the cash flow. If Zombies stays a mode in a main game, it won't get raped for money as a series of its own. Would you prefer a quality game mode, or a low quality yearly cash grab?

I always wonder, have the suits ever played a video game? How can someone do business with games, when they don't like, understand games?

Boost in graphics, 2 hour long single player campaign, whiny kids playing the same types of matches (death match, capture the flag, etc) online all day... sound about right to everyone? (sarcasm, by the way)

The answer is a modified version of the Black Ops engine? That was a heavily modified version of the World at War engine! Why not just use the IW5 engine? You know, the better one?

Don't talk the Talk, just walk the walk. You can't bullsh*t me, the game looks just like MW3 ans BO1

I wasn't aware of asking for better graphics, as I recall, I asked for something to refresh the Call of Duty series that wouldn't make it seem like I was playing the same damn thing over and over again.

lol, "aware gamers want a better looking COD but sticking with the same engine".

But they don't care..

lets be realistic here, graphics wont improve until the next gen consoles is out

They have plenty of manpower and resources to create a new engine.

"They want us to make a better-looking game; they want things. I don't think those are things people can't ask for"

wow, seriously?

Looks like they've done all that they can but seriously, they can't just keep rehashing a graphics engine that is about a decade old (older if you think about it). They should leave IW or treyarch with loads more time to build a totally new engine. But then again, the source engine is doing quite well for its age though

this will still sell millions, people will still say it sucks and they will never buy it again and I'm sure the cycle will repeat itself. people must stop buying the product if they want to see change. in the industry money is the real driving force of change so vote with your wallet.

modified engine, yeah..

Why make the graphics better when they have millions of mindless drones buying the same rehashed game? They will never make the graphics better.