Feature Article

AOC Streaming Among Us Works Because It's Genuine

GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

The struggle for authenticity in politics won't be solved by gaming or streaming--it's that Rep. Ocasio-Cortez and Rep. Omar are best suited for it.

New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez made her Twitch debut streaming Among Us the other night with big-name streamers like Hasan Piker, Pokimane, Dr. Lupo, Jacksepticeye, and Hbomberguy, as well as her colleague, Minnesota Congresswoman Ilhan Omar. It's made headlines across gaming and non-gaming media, so you're probably familiar with what went down already, given the widespread coverage. I was one of the over 400,000 people watching Ocasio-Cortez's personal stream, enjoying the hell out of her and others legitimately having a good time in-game. Count me in the crowd of "never stan a politician" for simply taking part in a common hobby, but for AOC, the context is quite different.

Before I became an editor and video host here at GameSpot, I worked in politics--behind the scenes, managing campaigns in California, local, and statewide--and often managed the public-facing content of our clients and candidates on the internet. At the time, we were a young agency with a certain tech savvy that many of our clients did not have (they'd tend to be a generation or two apart from us). We'd ask for personal details that could connect them to their constituencies; photos, stories, interests, and experiences that we could share in blogs, official sites, tweets, and posts on various platforms. These would be delivered in addition to communicating actual policy visions.

Despite this, much of what I did felt so buttoned-up. Maybe it's because I was still green in that line of work and playing it safe. But when watchful endorsers and backers can lash out at the littlest thing you say that might be off-kilter, and with the resulting internal concern that could cause, creating online content was a tedious process that would have to go through more hoops than necessary. All I wanted to do was reach potential voters in a casual manner. So, the thought popped into my head while watching AOC's stream: What if my breakthrough as a political consultant was to get clients to stream? (And I thought of what kind of new hell that could spawn for the rest of us.)

The thing about AOC is that none of those burdens really matter because she can just present who she is. From the perspective of someone who comes from the working class, she is one of us--pretty much the same age as those around me and has put up with the same struggles we've had, too. Her time as a bartender from the Bronx (BX all day) prior to being elected is well-documented, and she put in the work for what is the closest thing I've seen to a legitimate grassroots effort for a successful run at Congress. She didn't have to exist in established political circles as a career and navigate a system through relationships, massive endorsements, or being a yes-person within a party. There is no manufactured brand to uphold.

If you've been keeping up with her work, streaming comes off as a sensible extension of what she already does on Instagram Live and her personal Twitter timeline.

Streaming works for her because it's genuine. This isn't some out-of-touch official doing the old "how do you do, fellow kids" routine to seem personable. I tend to cringe at the notion of politicians being "relatable" by sharing innocuous personal details, like their favorite junk food or the last TV series they marathoned. Good lord do I roll my eyes seeing photo ops where we see them at a local hole-in-the-wall restaurant to show voters "they're really just like us!" or say a butchered phrase in a foreign language to prove they're in tune with a minority--or whatever other performative nonsense we often see.

AOC cracks jokes about spaceships in Among Us still using gasoline and combustion engines and throws shade at the vice president without batting an eye, and gets hyped about colleagues like Michigan representatives Rashida Tlaib and Justin Amash also watching the stream. She can pull off a really entertaining stream and also use her platform to communicate how and why you should vote; without a script or manufactured talking points. Gaming is also already part of what Ocasio-Cortez does outside the public eye, as we've seen with her celebration of reaching silver rank in League of Legends and interactions through Animal Crossing. And if you've been keeping up with her work, streaming comes off as a sensible extension of what she already does on Instagram Live and her personal Twitter timeline.

Through those channels, AOC has also cultivated a fandom and following that's receptive to her messaging because she's able to naturally use these online platforms the same way most of us do. I wasn't all that surprised when her own Twitch viewer count hit over 400k, but when I step back to think about it, that's a whole lot more folks listening to authentic messages about voting than what you see from a typical political rally. And it helps that her viewers, as well as the audiences from the popular streamers who participated, are simply there for a fun time.

When you start a stream and you switch to the on-camera scene in OBS, you're the one who has to carry that stream and make it pop. And if you've approached your career through being open about your work and transparent in your representation of people, there really isn't anything to worry about when you go live. I sure as hell wouldn't trust any official I've worked with in the past to do that, and I'm sure they wouldn't want to be in that position in the first place.

Is this the future of politics? Or is this something other politicians can take advantage of? It really depends. You won't manufacture the first gamer president (sorry Ace Watkins). You can't force gaming or streaming onto a candidate, and you also won't win campaigning through an Among Us or Fortnite stream. But there's a genuine chemistry that can be had with influencers and audiences that are receptive to real social democratic messaging. We saw that with AOC between major names like Pokimane, Hasan, and Hbomberguy, and we heard it throughout in this Among Us stream. And when everyone said their goodbyes and thanks, they very naturally remembered the point was to encourage voting and spread voter awareness, and did so more successfully than most traditional campaigns have done of late.

There's a sizable progressive audience that can be reached, one that doesn't want to be fed the same bullshit established political parties have been pushing well before the day we've internalized politics. The last thing I'd want to see in light of AOC's wild first-time success is a bunch of milquetoast politicians flooding Twitch doing manufactured streams. That's not to gatekeep gaming and streaming from them, but to warn them that it's a crowd that can see right through obvious political plays.

The struggle for authenticity in politics isn't going to be solved by gaming and streaming, and it's probably not a great gateway to become an authentic political voice. But it'd be wise to engage a wide audience in a humanizing fashion that reflects them, and that's exactly what Ocasio-Cortez achieved.


highammichael

Michael Higham

Senior Editor and Host at GameSpot. Filipino-American. Ask me about Yakuza, FFXIV, Persona, or Nier. If it's RPGs, I have it covered. Apparently I'm the tech expert here, too? Salamat sa 'yong suporta!

Among Us

Among Us

Follow
Back To Top
135 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for Smosh150
Smosh150

3050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

At this point these articles are just fun for the comments section. Some believe she is the personification of everything wrong with the US, some who don't believe her to be genuine, some who think she is the most sympathetic politician, some who believe she will be the savior of their party (Or our government), etc.

Personally I don't trust her to be genuine, but I'm not going to say it isn't possible. Everyone even someone who may start from humble beginnings may be or may become just as corrupt as any other, there are those who can just play the game better for the newer generation. I like her better than most other politicians out there, but it takes a lot to earn trust when you are one.

If she actually believes what she stands for and isn't sacrificing those beliefs even if I don't agree with them than that does deserve some respect. Too many in our government who will act like the other side is evil, but they are the same and are fine with the status quo.

6 • 
Avatar image for jsprunk
jsprunk

2378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 5

@Smosh150: AOC doesn’t come from humble beginnings. Like a good communist, she lied about growing up in the Bronx. She grew up in a multimillion dollar home in Westchester county, one of the richest areas on the planet.

7 • 
Avatar image for Cashmoney007
Cashmoney007

377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@jsprunk: Many people don't care about facts anymore because they would rather be a drone and have other people teach them how to think.

4 • 
Avatar image for Smosh150
Smosh150

3050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

@Cashmoney007: @jsprunk Many people seem to make assumptions about my statement when it was a pretty obvious generalization rather than specifically targeting AOC.

No, I form my own opinions, both sides are just as bullshit as the other and any "good" politicians even my most liked with some actual power (Rand Paul) is still just another politician.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jsprunk
jsprunk

2378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 5

@Smosh150: I’m with you there. Neither candidate is talking about the main issue of how devalued the US dollar is (98.5% since 1975) because of the Fed and unlimited sources of credit available. Somehow, people think healthcare and housing got ridiculously expensive all by themselves, and now the “magical fix” comes in the form of government-run healthcare and subsidized housing from the same people who caused the money problems in the first place.

Joe Biden especially is trying to convince people that carrying over $100T in national debt is what the founders intended for America. Commie morons just eat it up because “free stuff” and “equality” and all of the other stupid buzz words that the Dems have no intention of providing.

As Ron Paul would say, audit the Fed, fix the money and all the rest will fall in line.

3 • 
Avatar image for TC_Moon
TC_Moon

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

If it's so genuine, then why do you feel the need to make like 5 articles about it while there are already hundreds of stories about it? It doesn't feel genuine when it's constantly being shoved in our faces, Gamespot. People don't like being patronized. I'm left-leaning and I find it very obnoxious.

11 • 
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

Edited By texasgoldrush

@TC_Moon: Other sites are saying the same thing, and not only gaming sites, but news sites.

https://www.theguardian.com/games/2020/oct/22/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-ilhan-omar-among-us-twitch-stream-aoc

Its not just Gamespot.......and lets face it....this Twitch stream is downright historic.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Pyrosa
Pyrosa

10650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

@texasgoldrush: It's because it's an official publicity stunt, which requires their media relations team to fan it out via the daily distribution network contacts. No different than any other talking points memo, ad buy, or article cross-post each day. There's a whole team on EACH campaign that does this for a living. Unfortunately I know a handful of them, and yes -- they work for the highest bidder, NOT along any party/ideal lines.

3 • 
Avatar image for TC_Moon
TC_Moon

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@texasgoldrush: I mentioned that in my original comment. "Hundreds of stories about it." It doesn't feel genuine when a ton of different sites are pushing the story as much as they can. I've seen it everywhere and when I see Washington Post with a video titled "Is AOC sus?", all I can think about is the boomers desperately trying to appeal to gen z. It's not genuine. It's pandering.

5 • 
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

@TC_Moon: They push this story because its a historic moment in gaming in relation to political figures.

Its not about boomers trying to appeal to Gen Z either, and the article writers mostly aren't boomers.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for TC_Moon
TC_Moon

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@texasgoldrush: I'm not really sure why you think it's so historic or why it even matters. Politicians found a new way to advertise, how historic? And I wasn't literally calling them boomers. That's my fault. I was just stating that's how it feels.

I've been really enjoying Among Us's rise in popularity because it DID feel genuine. It wasn't like Fortnite where it was just everywhere and all these celebs started getting in on the Fortnite action, despite knowing nothing about it. Among Us was just a bunch of friends streaming together. THAT is genuine.

AOC's presence completely disrupts that. Now the Fortnite-esque wave feels here. Left-wing sites are building it up as much as they can. Right-wing sites are bashing it as much as they can. The more people talk about it like this, the less genuine it becomes, and this very article is part of that problem.

3 • 
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

Edited By texasgoldrush

@TC_Moon: The article isn't about the game, its about HER and Ilhan.

It has nothing to do with Among Us's genuine rise in popularity.

Is Animal Crossing's popularity less genuine because AOC and the Biden campaign used it? No. Its something you made up..

And how is AOC, Ilhan and her daughter, and bunch of streamers who are fans of them playing with each other not genuine? People talk about this because it is genuine and the right fear her genuine nature.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for TC_Moon
TC_Moon

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@texasgoldrush: I didn't say the games were less genuine. I said those acts weren't. I called them advertising/pandering. That's how they're not genuine. Streamers made the game popular, not the other way around. AOC isn't playing to simply have some genuine fun. Everybody knows that. Maybe if she played some game she loved as a child and just wanted to show it off, or just casually game and chat (like a "genuine" streamer), then yeah. I wouldn't have anything to say about that. But politicians are suddenly hopping on popular games right before an election. Does that reeeeeeally feel genuine to you? I have absolutely nothing against AOC as a politician. Doesn't bother me one bit. But I am allowed to call this disingenuous on an article stating the opposite.

2 • 
Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@texasgoldrush: The writer of the article may not be a boomer, but the vast majority of the DNC leadership is. Ironically, their current leader Joe Biden is too old to be a boomer.

As for the stream itself, while it may help move a few more voters to the polls, there’s no guarantee all of those votes will be for Ds.

You may have a few people slightly upset AOC chose to stream with Hasan “America deserved 9/11” Abi. I’m willing to bet a lot of people that were directly affected by 9/11 live in her district, but she’s still safe because they would vote for a turd if it had a (D) next to it in her district. But as one of the current faces of the Democratic Party, it may cause issues elsewhere.

3 • 
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

@ad1x2: And what does the DNC have to do with this? Or AOC other than the fact that they shafted her at the convention and that she has to try and cover for their weaknesses in voter outreach?

And people have other options in that district, its called primaries. AOC got rid of a longtime congressman there. And another candidate ran against her in the primary. Voters there could have gotten rid of her, they didn't. Maybe because they love her, as she did almost 15 points better than average contested primary win.

And I am pretty sure that streamers presence is minor in regards to her upcoming future.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@texasgoldrush: Dude, no matter how much you simp for AOC, she's not going to go out with you.

And yes, choosing to stream with a controversial person can hurt her in the long run. Not in her particular district, but if she has any aspirations beyond her house seat (primarying Chuck Schumer, running for president in 10-20 years), she should have known better.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for id0ntkn0w7
ID0ntKn0w7

2289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@ad1x2: shit, how could I forget about Brown Fabio? I knew that name was familiar!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Sound_Demon
Sound_Demon

1326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By Sound_Demon

I'm proud of this community for being more sensible than the writers themselves and seeing through the political injection and calling these "game" journalists out on it.

10 • 
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

@Sound_Demon: To you......

Ever thought that this is a story that should be covered because I don't know, it involves gaming?

2 • 
Avatar image for Sound_Demon
Sound_Demon

1326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@texasgoldrush: Have you read the articles editorial work, literally praising her? A foolish person who doesn't understand legalities of crime and pretends to be just and virtuous but spreads dangerous misinformation is all she is and does.

4 • 
Avatar image for Pyrosa
Pyrosa

10650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

@texasgoldrush: In this case, that is their desired effect. Your eyeballs have to NOT see this as a manufactured outreach event and believe it's organic. The publicity team has succeeded. The ad sales team on CBSi is equally pleased, because "reactions" increase rates. (My ad blocker and script blocker prevents my posts from scoring anything but the actual post hits, by comparison.)

5 • 
Avatar image for Gatorjosh14
Gatorjosh14

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Genuine pandering....

12 • 
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

Edited By texasgoldrush

Once again, for her scared and stupid detractors.

AOC is the most skilled and talented active political figure right now in America.

Not only does she have the authenticity of what is described above, she is one hell of a communicator, has great political instincts, has a great mind for political strategy and tactics, has an empathetic persona, is an excellent debater and a political combat expert, top tier organizing and staffing, a media master, tough as nails, learns from mistakes, and is an excellent small dollar fundraiser. As of now, her only weakness is experience, but she also brings in alternative experience with long time political figures do not have.

Detractors lash out because they simply are not in control. The right wing just go stupid because they cannot handle her skills, so they go low and easily get rendered ineffective. The center badly underestimates her influence and now are paying the price, especially locally in NY. Gov. Cuomo even suggested that her primary win was "a fluke", and the 2020 primaries proved him stupid. These people are going to really find out that AOC is going to be FAR more effective than Bernie Sanders.

Any political figure that can rise this quickly is the real deal. In two years, she goes from a virtually unknown bartender to a political force that unnerves her opponents. That is unprecedented.

4 • 
Avatar image for Cashmoney007
Cashmoney007

377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Cashmoney007

@texasgoldrush: LOL!

I can always count on you for a laugh.

5 • 
Avatar image for BLKCrystilMage
BLKCrystilMage

1373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 112

User Lists: 0

@texasgoldrush: $0.02 has been added to your Steam Wallet.

2 • 
Avatar image for zyxe
zyxe

5348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

zyxe  Moderator

@texasgoldrush: "Any political figure that can rise this quickly is the real deal. In two years, she goes from a virtually unknown bartender to a political force that unnerves her opponents. That is unprecedented."

Trump rose extremely quickly (in politics). I'm not convinced a quick rise is a good gauge of who's the "real deal".

3 • 
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

Edited By texasgoldrush

@zyxe: He became President, did he not? The Democrats (and his GOP primary opponents) didn't think he was the "real deal" in 2016 and we paid a huge price.

Obama became President, didn't he not? That was a quick rise as well, right after a primary beatdown in 2000. A speech and a Senate race in 2004 and four years later, he was President.

JFK and RFK were relatively quick as well.

Quick rises ARE historically linked with successful political careers. And AOC's rise is EXTREMELY fast, and at her young age, makes it extremely likely she has a successful career. She already has actually, and she has even influenced the Presidential race (and was key to building Biden's climate policy).

Upvote • 
Avatar image for zander80
Zander80

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

@texasgoldrush: First of all, you completely missed what zyxe said.

Second, AOC has not influenced anything yet, she's only a representative of a small and heavily liberal district. Biden has already dismissed the nonsense that is the green new beans or whatever. To show how little influence she (and similar politicians like Bernie, who arguably have even more influence) has, nearly every candidate she has endorsed in primaries since she got elected lost, and the ones that did make it past the primaries lost their general.

5 • 
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

@zander80: WRONG, on all counts.

AOC actually had a hand in crafting Biden's climate policy (along with John Kerry). In fact, it was Biden that had to compromise towards her position.

And AOC did pretty well in primary endorsements as well this year with many of them winning or coming close like Charles Booker. She also pretty much saved Ed Markey's Senate career.

The DSA cleaned up the NYC primaries and her allies won throughout the city. Her endorsement of Jamaal Bowman (who was inspired by her) helped him sack an incumbent veteran congressman. In fact, outside one candidate, everybody on her endorsement slate in her city won. She may now be the most powerful figure in the city.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for zander80
Zander80

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

@texasgoldrush: Ed Markey has been in the Senate for like 80 years, they weren't gonna replace him with an unknown Kennedy. She was inconsequential.

Complacency was a bigger threat to those incumbents than AOC or any other socialist. Besides, those districts are heavily left-wing which makes it easier for socialists to run and win in. Except Bernie, not a single one has one a statewide election, and that's only because he represents a tiny state with a 1/10 of the population of major cities.

2 • 
Avatar image for Gatorjosh14
Gatorjosh14

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@texasgoldrush: AOC is like the kid on the play ground that's trying to convince you that Mud Pie is delicious. Doesn't matter how good of a communicator she is when her product is Mud Pie...

8 • 
Avatar image for rawkstar007
rawkstar007

894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By rawkstar007

@texasgoldrush: Two things:

1. There is absolutely no way you aren’t some sort of AOC plant trying to stir things up.

2. This is a wildly inappropriate place for such rhetoric.

9 • 
Avatar image for Cashmoney007
Cashmoney007

377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Cashmoney007

@rawkstar007: He is another apologist that probably believes whatever the mainstream media tells him. I wish this wasn't true, but his comment history has proven that it is.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for MigGui
MigGui

2057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

@rawkstar007: why is the comment section of an article about AOC a bad place to talk about AOC?

2 • 
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

Edited By texasgoldrush

@MigGui: Because he is too self righteous to realize that its appropriate to talk about AOC in an article about her.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for mattwoahyeah
MattWoahYeah

442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

If you trust 50% of politicians, you may as well trust 50% of serial killers or 50% of drunk people operating heavy machinery.

9 • 
Avatar image for ghost140
ghost140

744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

*Insert 'Here we go again' meme*

5 • 
Avatar image for jadephoenix13
JadePhoenix13

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Her being the traitor would certainly make it genuine.

13 •