GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Blizzard Pokes Fun At Star Wars Battlefront 2 On Twitter

Burn.

108 Comments

Blizzard today announced that its RTS StarCraft II is now free-to-play on PC, and one part of the reveal involved poking fun at EA's Star Wars: Battlefront II. Specifically, Blizzard released a series of tweets in which it mentioned that none of its content is locked behind playtime barriers. Battlefront II has been in the middle of controversy regarding how long it takes to unlock some characters, while the game is also facing criticism that it's bordering on a pay-to-win scenario.

Blizzard didn't skip a beat, leveraging this for its own benefit. Below is a screencap of the three tweets in question. Sick burn.

No Caption Provided

Battlefront II was criticised for, among other things, how long it takes to unlock heroes in multiplayer such as Luke Skywalker and Darth Vader. In response to this, EA reduced the number of credits you need to unlock those characters by a whopping 75 percent.

EA has said it is constantly listening to fan feedback and will make changes to Battlefront II as needed going forward. CFO Blake Jorgensen commented on the controversy this week, saying fans should be patient as DICE considers feedback.

StarCraft II's switch to free-to-play was announced at BlizzCon earlier this month, but the conversion officially happened today. New players who are getting into StarCraft II for the first time will be able to play through the entire Wings of Liberty campaign for free. All of the current and upcoming co-op commanders are also free to play up to level five, while Raynor, Kerrigan, and Artanis will remain free to level up as much as you want.

You can read more about the business model switch here in GameSpot's previous coverage. We also spoke with StarCraft production director Tim Morten about how this update will affect the player base.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 108 comments about this story
108 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for byof_america
byof_america

1952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Wait a flying fucking second, both Overwatch and Heroes of the Storm have loot boxes and Heroes of the Storm DOES lock stuff behind a paywall.

2 • 
Avatar image for Cataclysmic0001
Cataclysmic0001

149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Meanwhile, Overwatch is under investigation by the same gaming commission as Battlefront...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Dragon_Nexus
Dragon_Nexus

1401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Oh yeah, the people who popularised the loot crate movement should absolutely be taking some kind of moral high ground as they witness the logical continuation of their scheme.

2 • 
Avatar image for kreegan64
kreegan64

44

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

lol

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dragonsama
dragonsama

1421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Wow that' takes a lot of balls considering Blizzard is the reason this who Loot Crate Debacle started in the first place!

If it wasn't for them using them in OverWatch and how popular it became none of this stupid stuff with Battlefront 2 would have happened.

Yes Blizzard you are no saint! This was started by you! Own up to it and say you were wrong!!!

5 • 
Avatar image for phoenixboyz
phoenixboyz

428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@dragonsama:

TF 2 and CS GO have loot crate too, in fact, in the game you got the box for free, but you need to buy "keys" to open to box, but they all are cosmetic and not core game changer. These 2 games are the pioneer of loot crate but no one making any noise. because unlike EA's SW BF 2, they have gone too far with loot crate.

Blizzard's Overwatch is like TF2 and CS GO. so they are basically fine. the only small difference is TF2 and CS GO got crates for free, needs to pay to buy keys. Overwatch buy crates

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Drkr_Zen
Drkr_Zen

7330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Remember SW:BFI+II on PS2/XBOX, guys? Remember when those games were good? Yeaaahhh.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jyml8582
jyml8582

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

*COUGH diablo 3 real money auction house *COUGH

7 • 
Avatar image for Zorlac
Zorlac

1511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Edited By Zorlac

@jyml8582: Yep, gone after a few months.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for skippert
skippert

976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Edited By skippert

Hey look the hypocrits have also joined the party. Was wondering where they were hiding. Wonder if the staff member that wrote this even played SC2. He would also know that this game has plenty of stuff locked away which users need to pay for. They basically invented this shit with their commanders being locked away behind 4.99 EUR. God the amount of lootboxes that my eyes has seen in Overwatch. And what about D3, lets not even start on that mess.

8 • 
Avatar image for Zorlac
Zorlac

1511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

@skippert: Oh no, you have to unlock cosmetics in overwatch!! Blizzard are they devils!!

3 • 
Avatar image for dragonsama
dragonsama

1421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Zorlac: Hate to say it but if you game the Game industry an inch they will take 1,000,000 light years. If It wasn't for the Blizzard Loot Boxes then I'm pretty sure we never would have gotten this far.

2 • 
Avatar image for Zorlac
Zorlac

1511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

@dragonsama: You might be right, but you can't blame Blizzard for other companies getting out of hand with it when they themselves have helped keep it in check.

3 • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

19960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

mogan  Moderator

@skippert: I just started playing StarCraft 2 again, and as far as I can tell, the stuff you can pay for now is pretty much all co-op characters. I'm not 100% sure what SC2's co-op mode entails, but I'm pretty confident it wasn't even a thing back when the first of these games game out. So, I don't know that you can say they're locking parts of the game behind a paywall so much as they're making more content to the already sizable product.

3 • 
Avatar image for skippert
skippert

976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Edited By skippert

@Mogan: Last time I checked (up to now) we paid a substantial amount of money for each SC2 release. And that huge marketplace like system they incorporated in co-op is still there. Add everything up and that sizable product you speak of is simply a game with a normal price PLUS stuff locked behind a pay wall. Its fact. And were only talking about SC2 here so please dont forget about all that other Blizzard / Activision content that incorporates microtransactions - Heck we can even bring Destiny or Call of Duty into this now if you really want to.

3 • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

19960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Edited By mogan  Moderator

@skippert: I don't know about a co-op marketplace, but isn't everything related to co-op something new they added well after release? And weren't each of the three core games/expansions reasonably sized?

I'm not seeing the similarities between StarCraft 2 and Battlefront 2. And Destiny, on top of not being made by Blizzard, doesn't have the kind of problems Battlefront 2 has, or the kind Blizzard is poking fun at here.

3 • 
Avatar image for moviespot
Moviespot

343

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@skippert: yeah, elaborate.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Nightflash28
Nightflash28

2351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@skippert: Pls elaborate

Upvote • 
Avatar image for omegazeda
omegazeda

114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Nightflash28: Fucking overwatch lootboxes dicked!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for skippert
skippert

976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Edited By skippert

@Nightflash28: I dont think this needs further elaboration. But if you wish to remain blind to the fact then so be it. It really is not worth discussing further whether or not this is the case. You people should be more worried about how to stop it happening in future games so we dont all get screwed over... I dont care if its Blizzard or EA or anyone else these microtransaction systems screw us all.

3 • 
Avatar image for Nightflash28
Nightflash28

2351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@skippert: You used many words to say nothing.

2 • 
Avatar image for l_willard
L_Willard

144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@skippert: Elaborate

Upvote • 
Avatar image for uubershikamarux
uubershikamarux

326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm surprised they didn't release Moira the day Star Wars came out

Upvote • 
Avatar image for PETERAKO
PETERAKO

2579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Oh shut up bliz! You started this whole mess!

4 • 
Avatar image for Nightflash28
Nightflash28

2351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Nightflash28

@PETERAKO: Did they? I can't recall a single one of Blizzard's game where you could buy a gameplay advantage (well, maybe except Hearthstone, but that's just how trading card games work, so not a good example either). All their loot boxes contain purely cosmetic stuff.

2 • 
Avatar image for Dragon_Nexus
Dragon_Nexus

1401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Nightflash28: Real. Money. Auction. House.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Thanatos2k
Thanatos2k

17660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Thanatos2k

@Nightflash28: Saying "that's how trading card games work" is not an excuse, because Hearthstone is a piss poor trading card game. You can't trade cards with others. You can't sell cards to others. You can't directly but the cards you need from others. It has none of the benefits of a real trading card game and they keep raising the prices.

3 • 
Avatar image for PETERAKO
PETERAKO

2579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Nightflash28: Its how they went about their loot boxes, and not what they put in them. It boomed and then others followed in its wake.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

19960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

mogan  Moderator

@PETERAKO: Ehh, I don't think that's true. Microtransactions and loot crates were a fairly established thing before Blizzard used them. And StarCraft 2, specifically, doesn't have any pay-to-win mechanics in it, or a complicated, RNG progression system.

3 • 
Avatar image for PETERAKO
PETERAKO

2579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Mogan: Yes, they were established before, but how actibliz did it in overwatch created a setpping stone. With the acceptance that overwatches loot boxes gained by the gaming community, publishers such as EA sought to take the whole damn pie while they were offered a small piece.

2 • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

19960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

mogan  Moderator

@PETERAKO: I don't think you can really blame Blizzard for what EA's done here. Overwatch's loot boxes are a generally positive aspect of that game (heroes/maps are free, the loot boxes are purely cosmetic, you earn them a real regular pace just by playing the game), while Battlefront's biggest problem isn't that there are loot boxes, but that the game's progression has been tied so inextricably to them that advancing through it relies on results from a random number generator.

People keep wanting to lump all microtransactions together as a single, context free, horrible, industry ruining thing, but that argument doesn't actually work. It's like saying all DLC is bad because Horse Armor sucked and then blaming Bethesda.

3 • 
Avatar image for PETERAKO
PETERAKO

2579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Mogan: I do not put the blame entirely on blizzard, but they did normalise it in a big way. on top of that, still not all is fine and dandy. Why would I have to deal with lootboxes instead of having the ability to get what I want outright and keep loot boxes free only? It's still a crappy practice that taps into your frustration.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for kevo44
KevO44

104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Edited By KevO44

Mr Pot may I introduce you to Mr Kettle.

5 • 
Avatar image for Thanatos2k
Thanatos2k

17660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Thanatos2k

Says the crappy company pushing lootboxes themselves. Says the company that broke a single game into multiple games and charging you repeatedly for it. Says the company that put a real money auction house into Diablo 3.

18 • 
Avatar image for Thanatos2k
Thanatos2k

17660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@JosephDMcDaniel: "Overwatch's lootboxes contain only cosmetic-"

Overwatch is not a free to play game. Overwatch should not have lootboxes, or any microtransactions whatsoever.

3 • 
Avatar image for koospetoors
koospetoors

3715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

Edited By koospetoors

@Thanatos2k: Its especially ironic when you look at Hearthstone as well. Regardless of it being a freemium game, they can't really go poke fun at EA for tucking characters behind a paywall and incorporating pay 2 win systems when that's exactly the case with one (two with HoTS?) of their own games. Not being able to do jack with the free standard decks against other players, earning gold coins taking a lot of effort and not getting much out of the challenges is all done brilliantly enough to have players reaching for their wallets to buy packs in bulk out of frustration.

And this is all besides the fact that it is Blizzard's success with lootboxes EA is chasing. So yeah, kettle calling pot black here pretty much haha.

6 • 
Avatar image for l_willard
L_Willard

144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@koospetoors: I know that I am very much an exception here, but I am F2P in Hearthstone and have a massive collection. It is not complete by any means but established enough to create countless competitive decks that are both interesting and fun to play.

But yeah, I have to agree that the system is designed to get players to clamor for more and more and preys upon the impatient and compulsive. Which is pretty gross.

But my overall point stands. If you are patient, Hearthstone can be a great and truly free experience.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Thanatos2k
Thanatos2k

17660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Thanatos2k

@l_willard: I'm F2P in Hearthstone and haven't missed a quest since Nax. He's completely right, the acquisition rates are terrible and designed to coerce you into paying. You can cobble together maybe one or two top tier decks unless you disenchant your entire collection.

Other games are far better than Hearthstone at this point, like Shadowverse, Elder Scrolls Legends, and Gwent. Hearthstone has become a miserable experience.

3 • 
Avatar image for l_willard
L_Willard

144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Thanatos2k: Hearthstone is a blast

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Thanatos2k
Thanatos2k

17660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@l_willard: Maybe two years ago. It is now a mismanaged mess run by a dev team that has no idea what they're doing.

2 • 
Avatar image for l_willard
L_Willard

144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Thanatos2k: It is a really fun game to play

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Thanatos2k
Thanatos2k

17660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Thanatos2k

@l_willard: Yeah, playing on curve every turn and having games decided by RNG is a blast. Playing against Highlander Priest is so fun!

2 • 
Avatar image for l_willard
L_Willard

144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Thanatos2k: Agreed. The RNG is super exciting! What's a curve?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Thanatos2k
Thanatos2k

17660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Thanatos2k

@l_willard: I was being sarcastic, Hearthstone is a steaming pile right now due to RNG. RNG is a disgrace to competitive card games.

2 • 
Avatar image for NeoCloudZero
NeoCloudZero

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@koospetoors: you really can't compare hearthstone to this loot box madness. The reason behind this is because it is more like a collectable card game in a way. The fun of ccg is opening packs and you will never know what you might get. The difference of hearthstone comparing to stand ccg is the fact you don't get a physical copy of the card but none the less the concept is the same thing. The problem with these loot box is that they are making gameplay affecting features behind a RNG pay wall system that is not guaranteed when the game already cost 60 dollar. So basically you pay to see if you get a chance to get an game affecting item. As you said hearthstone is free and having a gold system makes more sense. I don't play hearthstone nor battlefront so I'm not trying to defend blizzard but I'm just trying to state that hearthstone is something you shouldn't compare these things to as they are not orange to orange comparison.

Upvote •